GNLP1021
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19831
Received: 03/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Haydn Brown
I have lived in Prince Andrews Road for 53 years. If GNLP1021 is passed then we, in Hellesdon, will have much needed recreational space, particularly on the east side of Cromer Road - where we would have absolutely nothing if GNLP2173 is preferred. In effect, we are asking for a very minute number of houses (max 50) to be removed from your Local Plan with your rejection of GNLP2173. How about you doing the right thing by placing residents' well-being in front of this unreasonable development where we can expect up to 100 extra vehicles negotiating side streets.
I have lived in Prince Andrews Road for 53 years. If GNLP1021 is passed then we, in Hellesdon, will have much needed recreational space, particularly on the east side of Cromer Road - where we would have absolutely nothing if GNLP2173 is preferred. In effect, we are asking for a very minute number of houses (max 50) to be removed from your Local Plan with your rejection of GNLP2173. How about you doing the right thing by placing residents' well-being in front of this unreasonable development where we can expect up to 100 extra vehicles negotiating side streets.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19881
Received: 09/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Richard Grady
This site is the last available green space in Hellesdon and I fully support its retention as green / recreational space
This site is the last available green space in Hellesdon and I fully support its retention as green / recreational space
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19884
Received: 09/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Alan Harper
(Representation changed from object to support as respondent appears to support the use of site for public recreation as proposed under site GNLP1021)
Hellesdon is a growing parish. A consequence of an increasing population is the need, and demand, for green spaces to which the public has access for recreation and leisure pursuits. Hellesdon already suffers from a shortage of such green spaces. The land in question was used for many years for recreation purposes. Since its closure to the public about 3 years ago, the public has been deprived of one of a diminishing number of green spaces in this part of Hellesdon. I urge Jarrolds, site owner, to rethink their plans and preserve the entirety of this plot to public access.
Hellesdon is a growing parish. A consequence of an increasing population is the need, and demand, for green spaces to which the public has access for recreation and leisure pursuits. Hellesdon already suffers from a shortage of such green spaces. The land in question was used for many years for recreation purposes. Since its closure to the public about 3 years ago, the public has been deprived of one of a diminishing number of green spaces in this part of Hellesdon. I urge Jarrolds, site owner, to rethink their plans and preserve the entirety of this plot to public access.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19891
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Paul Stevens
(Comment changed from object to support as respondent seems to be objecting to additional housing on site rather then this proposal for leisure/recreation)
Firstly I appreciate the need for extra housing. That said, financial gain must not be allowed over common sense as in this case, to build in such a place as proposed.
Since the opening of the NDR, traffic has increased significantly with traffic backing up from the ring road making Heath Crescent difficult to depart from.
The proposed entrance is desperate measure in my opinion as they cannot see an alternative.
I am totally against this proposal, with the extra traffic resulting from additional housing ,extra strain put on local resources and more loss of green area.
Firstly I appreciate the need for extra housing. That said, financial gain must not be allowed over common sense as in this case, to build in such a place as proposed.
Since the opening of the NDR, traffic has increased significantly with traffic backing up from the ring road making Heath Crescent difficult to depart from.
The proposed entrance is desperate measure in my opinion as they cannot see an alternative.
I am totally against this proposal, with the extra traffic resulting from additional housing ,extra strain put on local resources and more loss of green area.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19893
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Mr David Gibson
Fully support the parish council is trying to keep all this site for leisure purposes, Hellesdon needs to keep its last few remaining green sites
Fully support the parish council is trying to keep all this site for leisure purposes, Hellesdon needs to keep its last few remaining green sites
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19895
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows
We need to preserve green spaces, with more trees in order to help our carbon footprint, and don’t need more houses, which would create more traffic, and pollution.
We need more sport and leisure facilities, especially as we have more younger people in this area now.
We need to preserve green spaces, with more trees in order to help our carbon footprint, and don’t need more houses, which would create more traffic, and pollution.
We need more sport and leisure facilities, especially as we have more younger people in this area now.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19958
Received: 13/02/2020
Respondent: Mrs Monica Brown
This comment supports the site being a reasonable alternative.
This small plot of land is the only green land that can be used for recreation by the residents young and old this side of the busy Cromer Rd & will be a green and unpoluted(sic) area also taking storm rain to stop flooding.
As well as extra cars with the houses & will cause congestion getting onto the Cromer Rd for the residents and emergency vehicles. I support this land to be a green and peaceful place for the residents
GNLP1021
I have lived here for 52 years and have seen more of Hellesdon green land given up for building.
This small plot of land adjacent to Prince Andrew Rd and Heath Crescent is the only green land that can be used for recreation by the residents young and old this side of the busy Cromer Rd & will be a green and unpoluted(sic) area also taking storm rain to stop flooding.
As well as extra cars with the houses & will cause congestion getting onto the Cromer Rd for the residents and emergency vehicles. I support this land to be a green and peaceful place for the residents
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19961
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Thomas and Geraldine Lovering
Mr Lovering comments:
The Jarrolds plan is a very dangerous one and should not be given the go ahead.
1. The proposed exit from the site into Prince Andrews Road will be in between two blind corners, a right angle bend into Heath Crescent and a double bend with a further exit to a cul de sac in prince Andrews Road.
2. Building 30-50 houses will need heavy construction vehicle going in and out of the site from narrow roads with two dangerous blind junctions.
3. This plan does not take into account the requirements of the local residents.
4. The proposed plan GNLP1021 submitted by Hellesdon Parish Council should be adopted as it will provide green space and facilities badly needed for this area of Hellesdon residents.
GNLP1021
The Jarrolds plan is a very dangerous one and should not be given the go ahead.
1. The proposed exit from the site into Prince Andrews Road will be in between two blind corners, a right angle bend into Heath Crescent and a double bend with a further exit to a cul de sac in prince Andrews Road.
I live **** and am fully aware of the dangers at these two junctions.
2. Building 30-50 houses will need heavy construction vehicles going in and out of the site from narrow roads with two dangerous blind junctions.
3. This plan does not take into account the requirements of the local residents.
4. The proposed plan GNLP1021 submitted by Hellesdon Parish Council should be adopted as it will provide green space and facilities badly needed for this area of Hellesdon residents.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19965
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Smith
Comment supports site as reasonable
GNLP1021
This proposal should be accepted as there are no green facilities in this part of Hellesdon.
Having a local green space and facilities will allow elderly residents to meet without having to cross or walk along busy roads.
GNLP2173
30-50 homes will put extra pressure on medical centres and there are already problems.
Most residents in this part of Prince Andrews Road are elderly and more cars and heavy vehicles will cause great concern.
GNLP1021
This proposal should be accepted as there are no green facilities in this part of Hellesdon.
Having a local green space and facilities will allow elderly residents to meet without having to cross or walk along busy roads.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19966
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: MR & MRS ALAN & JANETTE WELLS
Comment supports site as reasonable
Comment from Mrs Wells
I am in agreement with the land being used as amenity land for the local population. There are no facilities in Hellesdon to the east of the main Cromer Road in Hellesdon. There is so much potential for the positive use of this land for local residents.
GNLP 1021
I am in agreement with the land being used as amenity land for the local population. There are no facilities in Hellesdon to the east of the main Cromer Road in Hellesdon. There is so much potential for the positive use of this land for local residents.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19967
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: MR & MRS ALAN & JANETTE WELLS
Comment supports the site as reasonable
Comment from Mr Wells
GNLP 1021
I am in agreement/support the adjacent proposal
a) there is no parkland/recreational land to the east of Cromer Road.
b) Cromer Road is dangerous to cross for pedestrian to access Meadow Way and Hellesdon P.C.C
Hellesdon is already 'over-urbanised' and has less public green space than other parishes.
GNLP 2173 is the developers anticipated 'fall-back'position! And is unacceptable
GNLP 1021
I am in agreement/support the adjacent proposal
a) there is no parkland/recreational land to the east of Cromer Road.
b) Cromer Road is dangerous to cross for pedestrian to access Meadow Way and Hellesdon P.C.C
Hellesdon is already 'over-urbanised' and has less public green space than other parishes.
GNLP 2173 is the developers anticipated 'fall-back'position! And is unacceptable
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19996
Received: 20/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Simon Baxter
comment supports the site as reasonable
I think this needs to be used as land for the community. There isn't a park or any green areas to play on this side of the Cromer road. Along with this Fifers Lane already struggles to cope with the amount of traffic using it and by putting more homes there and then more traffic you are just increasing the chance of accident when trying to pull out on an already busy road. Hellesdon doesn't need more houses and this land should be for the local residents to use and enjoy. With two young children this green space is definitely needed in the area.
I think this needs to be rejected and used as land for the community. There isn't a park or any green areas to play on this side of the Cromer road. Along with this Fifers Lane already struggles to cope with the amount of traffic using it and by putting more homes there and then more traffic you are just increasing the chance of accident when trying to pull out on an already busy road. Hellesdon doesn't need more houses and this land should be for the local residents to use and enjoy. With two young children this green space is definitely needed in the area.
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20039
Received: 21/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Stephen Cage
Here we go again. O look a spare piece of land it needs to have 30/50 houses on it with 30/50 cars just like the other end of hellesdon with 1000 new houses and 1000 cars. NO what heath crescent needs is to be turned into leisure land for the people who already live in hellesdon.
All we keep hearing is people need to get out, get fit, relax to help the strain of mental health, so there is no need at all to put more pressure on traffic and people already in an area that is full to capacity.
Here we go again. O look a spare piece of land it needs to have 30/50 houses on it with 30/50 cars just like the other end of hellesdon with 1000 new houses and 1000 cars. NO what heath crescent needs is to be turned into leisure land for the people who already live in hellesdon.
All we keep hearing is people need to get out, get fit, relax to help the strain of mental health, so there is no need at all to put more pressure on traffic and people already in an area that is full to capacity.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20067
Received: 23/02/2020
Respondent: MR Marlon Fulcher
Broadland’s own policies on formal recreation space and green infrastructure (Recreation Provision in Residential Development SPD) show that Hellesdon has only about 50% of the amount it should have. The Parish Council plans include formal and informal uses, as such this should clearly be supported. Furthermore this is the right plan in the right place, there are no green spaces east of the Cromer Road and there is a need for play equipment in this quadrant of Hellesdon. Currently children and young families have to cross the busy road Cromer Road on foot or must Drive - more CO2!
Broadland’s own policies on formal recreation space and green infrastructure (Recreation Provision in Residential Development SPD) show that Hellesdon has only about 50% of the amount it should have. The Parish Council plans include formal and informal uses, as such this should clearly be supported. Furthermore this is the right plan in the right place, there are no green spaces east of the Cromer Road and there is a need for play equipment in this quadrant of Hellesdon. Currently children and young families have to cross the busy road Cromer Road on foot or must Drive - more CO2!
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20120
Received: 26/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Stuart Warner
Hellesdon needs more green space for recreational purposes and the community cannot afford the land to be lost to another housing development. As I like to keep active i would actively use this area for running and walking my dog. As sport england have already commented this land should remain solely for recreational purposes as it has been intended in recent history.
Hellesdon needs more green space for recreational purposes and the community cannot afford the land to be lost to another housing development. As I like to keep active i would actively use this area for running and walking my dog. As sport england have already commented this land should remain solely for recreational purposes as it has been intended in recent history.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20122
Received: 26/02/2020
Respondent: Miss Charlotte Adams
More green space is needed in hellesdon and this land is needed in its entirity to meet the communities need.
More green space is needed in hellesdon and this land is needed in its entirity to meet the communities need.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20131
Received: 22/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Andrew Nickerson
I write in support of the Hellesdon Parish Council's resolution to provide greater green space, particularly in the area between Cromer Rd and Fifers Lane.
In the future, if the status quo remains, my family's choices for local recreational ground would necessitate the crossing of a busy main road. This is bizarre considering this piece of land existing a stone's throw from my home.
I can understand Jarrolds' desire to profit from their ownership of this land by developing it. However, the benefit to the community of making this a public open space, particularly given the extent to which Hellesdon is being developed in terms of housing, should not be forgotten.
I hope that opportunities will be explored to allow this land to be used for the benefit of the community and generations to come.
I write in support of the Hellesdon Parish Council's resolution to provide greater green space, particularly in the area between Cromer Rd and Fifers Lane.
One of the persuasive factors (in moving to the local area) was the proximity to the local park. If baffled me to discover that this park is in fact private land belonging to Jarrolds and currently closed off.
In the future, if the status quo remains, my family's choices for local recreational ground would necessitate the crossing of a busy main road. This is bizarre considering this piece of land existing a stone's throw from my home.
I can understand Jarrolds' desire to profit from their ownership of this land by developing it. However, the benefit to the community of making this a public open space, particularly given the extent to which Hellesdon is being developed in terms of housing, should not be forgotten.
I hope that opportunities will be explored to allow this land to be used for the benefit of the community and generations to come.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20134
Received: 23/02/2020
Respondent: Tina Anderson
Hellesdon has the blight of 1000 new houses on the old Norwich Royal Golf course site, which does not allow sufficient green site space for current residents of Hellesdon let alone another 1000 new families.
I do not believe Hellesdon can support any further housing development, on its roads, using its already over busy Doctor's surgery, and other amenities.
What we lack in Hellesdon is green recreational space.
I would like to support Hellesdon Parish Council in their bid for the old Jarrolds site to be used as additional recreational green space in Hellesdon.
We are all aware of the importance and value to our general health and well being that green spaces provides, for children, walkers and joggers, dog walkers, etc.
We have an inordinate number of new houses being built, but insufficient green space. Once this space has been filled with houses it is lost forever to people and wildlife. I fully support Hellesdon Parish Council in their application to use this space as green space. We do not need any further new housing developments in Hellesdon.
I understand there is currently a submission for further housing on the former Jarrold site in Hellesdon.
My concerns are great. Hellesdon has the blight of 1000 new houses on the old Norwich Royal Golf course site, which does not allow sufficient green site space for current residents of Hellesdon let alone another 1000 new families.
I do not believe Hellesdon can support any further housing development, on its roads, using its already over busy Doctor's surgery, and other amenities.
What we lack in Hellesdon is green recreational space.
I would like to support Hellesdon Parish Council in their bid for the old Jarrolds site to be used as additional recreational green space in Hellesdon.
We are all aware of the importance and value to our general health and well being that green spaces provides, for children, walkers and joggers, dog walkers, etc.
We have an inordinate number of new houses being built, but insufficient green space. Once this space has been filled with houses it is lost forever to people and wildlife. I fully support Hellesdon Parish Council in their application to use this space as green space. We do not need any further new housing developments in Hellesdon.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20136
Received: 23/02/2020
Respondent: Mrs Christine Walpole
Number of people: 2
With regard to the plans for housing on Jarrold's social and recreational site in Heath Crescent.
We believe this housing is not needed at this time, Hellesdon already has major house building being
carried out on the old Royal golf course site and more planned on the site near Hellesdon Hospital
as well as house's already completed in Hellesdon
If the predicted growth is achieved over the next ten years in this parish where are the children supposed
to play? we do not have enough green space in Hellesdon as it is and nothing this side of Cromer Rd
With regard to the plans for housing on Jarrold's social and recreational site in Heath Crescent.
We believe this housing is not needed at this time, Hellesdon already has major house building being
carried out on the old Royal golf course site and more planned on the site near Hellesdon Hospital
as well as house's already completed in Hellesdon
If the predicted growth is achieved over the next ten years in this parish where are the children supposed
to play? we do not have enough green space in Hellesdon as it is and nothing this side of Cromer Rd
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20195
Received: 29/02/2020
Respondent: Ms Janet Foster
I object to this development. Prince Andrews road is a quiet residential
area. This road is not suitable for more traffic. The condition of existing
road surface and pathways of Prince Andrews Road, Heath Crescent and
Brabazon road are in a poor state of repair. There is congestion
on Cromer Road already, with hazard cars parked, cars queuing to exit and enter Heath
Crescent and Brabazon Road. Think of the safety of children walking to school. Keep as a
sports ground venue, we need the green space in our area. Give it to the Parish council as a charity concern.
I object to this development. Prince Andrews road is a quiet residential
area. This road is not suitable for more traffic. The condition of existing
road surface and pathways of Prince Andrews Road, Heath Crescent and
Brabazon road are in a poor state of repair. There is congestion
on Cromer Road already, with hazard cars parked, cars queuing to exit and enter Heath
Crescent and Brabazon Road. Think of the safety of children walking to school. Keep as a
sports ground venue, we need the green space in our area. Give it to the Parish council as a charity concern.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20197
Received: 29/02/2020
Respondent: Mrs Lesley Cooper
There is a severe lack of recreational green space on the airport side of Hellesdon. You have to cross a very very busy and dangerous Cromer Road which has NO pedestrian crossing at Fifers Lane to reach any green space for dog walking etc etc. To invest in reopening/regenerating the Jarrod site as recreational would be long overdue and most welcome and safer for many elderly residents who wish/need to enjoy a walk.
There is a severe lack of recreational green space on the airport side of Hellesdon. You have to cross a very very busy and dangerous Cromer Road which has NO pedestrian crossing at Fifers Lane to reach any green space for dog walking etc etc. To invest in reopening/regenerating the Jarrod site as recreational would be long overdue and most welcome and safer for many elderly residents who wish/need to enjoy a walk.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20198
Received: 29/02/2020
Respondent: Mr Peter Cooper
Support only with no housing. What a wonderful opportunity to have a green space away from the traffic. on Cromer road and fifers lane we are surrounded by constant traffic. A chance for parents to take children for a walk safely. A few trees, bushes, shrubs an option for the children to run free on grass without threat of cars. Locals can walk their dogs on a lead and sit in the sun and have a chat . A very much need community meeting place, A play area for youngsters and elderly locals to walk in a relaxing green space.
Support only with no housing. What a wonderful opportunity to have a green space away from the traffic. on Cromer road and fifers lane we are surrounded by constant traffic. A chance for parents to take children for a walk safely. A few trees, bushes, shrubs an option for the children to run free on grass without threat of cars. Locals can walk their dogs on a lead and sit in the sun and have a chat . A very much need community meeting place, A play area for youngsters and elderly locals to walk in a relaxing green space.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20215
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Karen Crowe
Comment supports site being considered reasonable.
Having viewed the proposed plans for the Heath Crescent development I am totally against the Jarrolds proposition of between 35-50 houses: My main concern is the extra 100 cars trying to get to their place of work daily, the roads cannot deal with this & the pollution to the air will be horrendous. We already have enough traffic around this area due to the industrial sites. As well as this there are no green areas this side of the Cromer Road & the Parish councils proposed use of the site would be fantastic for families & dog walkers. We've lived here 33 years & I used to enjoy hearing the boys playing football on this site, much nicer to hear people having a good time than hearing 100 more cars going about their business.
The better option for anyone living near to this site is the green space but the greed of the owners of the land & the money making opportunity of the developers will probably outweigh the thoughtfulness to provide existing residents with a much nicer place to live.
One final thought is that by developing this site to houses would be a detriment to local wildlife & would also add to the flood risk as the rain will have nowhere to go as we are now realising as the country becomes a concrete jungle.
Having viewed the proposed plans for the Heath Crescent development I am totally against the Jarrolds proposition of between 35-50 houses: My main concern is the extra 100 cars trying to get to their place of work daily, the roads cannot deal with this & the pollution to the air will be horrendous. We already have enough traffic around this area due to the industrial sites. As well as this there are no green areas this side of the Cromer Road & the Parish councils proposed use of the site would be fantastic for families & dog walkers. We've lived here 33 years & I used to enjoy hearing the boys playing football on this site, much nicer to hear people having a good time than hearing 100 more cars going about their business.
The better option for anyone living near to this site is the green space but the greed of the owners of the land & the money making opportunity of the developers will probably outweigh the thoughtfulness to provide existing residents with a much nicer place to live.
One final thought is that by developing this site to houses would be a detriment to local wildlife & would also add to the flood risk as the rain will have nowhere to go as we are now realising as the country becomes a concrete jungle.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20216
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Stephen Crowe
Comment supports site as being reasonable.
I am in favour of GNLP1021 and oppose GNLP2173. With development of the Golf Club site & Hellesdon Hospital site there will be a need for some green/recreational areas to balance an increasingly expanding and over developed area. Traffic congestion which is already intolerable will worsen as a result of the above 2 developments. It would be irresponsible to let yet another green area (one of the few remaining) to disappear.
I have viewed the plans reference GNLP1021 & GNLP2173. I am in favour of GNLP1021 and oppose GNLP2173. With development of the Golf Club site & Hellesdon Hospital site there will be a need for some green/recreational areas to balance an increasingly expanding and over developed area. Traffic congestion which is already intolerable will worsen as a result of the above 2 developments. It would be irresponsible to let yet another green area (one of the few remaining) to disappear.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20274
Received: 04/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Julie Taylor
Hellesdon has become a sea of houses and I am horrified that Jarrolds are wanting to make it worse! Why not use the green space which is much needed for all of us old and young, and it could go back to a cricket ground or similar. and go and build on a Brown Sight (sic) - so many of them!
Hellesdon has become a sea of houses and I am horrified that Jarrolds are wanting to make it worse! Why not use the green space which is much needed for all of us old and young, and it could go back to a cricket ground or similar. and go and build on a Brown Sight (sic) - so many of them!
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20364
Received: 05/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs sarah beale
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting reasonable alternative use of GNLP1021)
The land should remain green for recreational and community use. - Not more housing.
I really don't think adding more houses to this area is appropriate for the welfare and sate of Hellesdon. Schools, doctors and dentists etc are already overcrowded and difficult to get in to. Traffic congestion added to this area would also be unfair to the local residents, who also have to contend with people parking in the area to use schools, shops and the airport.
The best use of this land would be to open as recreational ground and to make it a community area, where there can be play areas, make use of the pavilion, contact organisations who can rent for events such as fitness classes and parties etc. There isn't a park on that side of the Cromer Road for children to use or for people to walk their dogs. At the very least give it a go at this first. I am sure it would be a welcome addition and keep the area green, even use some of the land to plant new tress for wildlife etc.
The tennis courts could be rented out to generate revenue as the pavilion.
You only have to look at the likes of Eaton park to see what can be done, but this side of the city.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20535
Received: 09/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Victoria Reynolds
GNLP2173 I object to the proposal to build 30/50 properties on land at the rear of Heath Crescent and Prince Andrews Road.
Residents that live in the South East division - Fifers Lane/Cromer Road area to the ring road do not have any green spaces, parks or recreational areas. Therefore I support GNLP1021 as this will provide much needed green space for the local residents
To build more houses in this area will put even more traffic on to Cromer Road & Fifers Lane and also more pressure onto necessary services e.g schools & Hellesdon Medical Practice.
GNLP2173 I object to the proposal to build 30/50 properties on land at the rear of Heath Crescent and Prince Andrews Road.
Residents that live in the South East division - Fifers Lane/Cromer Road area to the ring road do not have any green spaces, parks or recreational areas. Therefore I support GNLP1021 as this will provide much needed green space for the local residents
To build more houses in this area will put even more traffic on to Cromer Road & Fifers Lane and also more pressure onto necessary services e.g schools & Hellesdon Medical Practice.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20567
Received: 07/03/2020
Respondent: Susan Gill
I feel most strongly we should protect as much of our green open spaces as possible so I am asking for the former Jarrold social & recreational site to remain a green open space.
Hellesdon is already well developed with enough housing, we need to protect our green open spaces for the sake of the limited wildlife in the area & for the well being of local residents.
We Do Not need more housing on the former Jarrold site.
I am responding to the article regarding green spaces in the Just Hellesdon February edition.
I feel most strongly we should protect as much of our green open spaces as possible so I am asking for the former Jarrold social & recreational site to remain a green open space.
Hellesdon is already well developed with enough housing, we need to protect our green open spaces for the sake of the limited wildlife in the area & for the well being of local residents.
We Do Not need more housing on the former Jarrold site.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20571
Received: 10/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Tracey CORNWELL
There are very few parks and very little green space in and around Hellesdon. This site would be perfect to be turned into green space for leisure use for residents to enjoy, further enhancing the quiet area of Prince Andrews Road and surrounding roads.
There are very few parks and very little green space in and around Hellesdon. This site would be perfect to be turned into green space for leisure use for residents to enjoy, further enhancing the quiet area of Prince Andrews Road and surrounding roads.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20725
Received: 12/03/2020
Respondent: Miss Claire Hall
This is just what Hellesdon needs, a bit more green open space for everyone including sports and everyday use for young and old people. This is also in the right place are no green spaces east of Cromer road and people living here have a long way to go to walk to a local park. I fully support the Parish Councils Plans
This is just what Hellesdon needs, a bit more green open space for everyone including sports and everyday use for young and old people. This is also in the right place are no green spaces east of Cromer road and people living here have a long way to go to walk to a local park. I fully support the Parish Councils Plans