GNLP0132

Showing comments and forms 1 to 9 of 9

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 19992

Received: 19/02/2020

Respondent: Mr Dennis Woods

Representation Summary:

We want more GP surgeries and new hospitals to be built along with all the new homes. Also new roads needed to take all the extra traffic.

Full text:

After visiting Local Plan at Diamond Centre Sprowston, and looking at the plans for the future I am just wondering where such ameneties as GP Surgeries etc were being built, In Sprowston at the present there is only 1 Doctors Surgery at Aslake Close. You can never get an appointment and like myself other residents have transfer from that to one in Norwich. All these new houses that have recently been built and plans show even more homes to be built, with schools etc but not a GP surgery where are all these new residents going. Thinking outside the box Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital is not big enough at present, where are all these new residents going to be treated. Where is all the extra traffic going, its difficult getting from a side road onto Wroxham Rd at present.

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 20907

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Sprowston Town Council

Representation Summary:

1. Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as a PREFERRED RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council makes further COMMENTS. See uploaded document "GNLP0132 Land off Blue Boar Lane and Salhouse Road_Sprowston Town Council"

Full text:

1. Sprowston Town Council SUPPPORTS that this site should be classified as a PREFERRED RESIDENTIAL SITE
2. Sprowston Town Council makes further COMMENTS. See uploaded document "GNLP0132 Land off Blue Boar Lane and Salhouse Road_Sprowston Town Council"

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 21197

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Hopkins Homes, Persimmon Homes and Taylor Wimpey

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

We strongly support the preferred allocation of GNLP0132, Land off Blue Boar Lane/Salhouse Road, White House Farm, Sprowston.

As has already been demonstrated through the Regulation 18 Stage A and B consultations, the site is deliverable in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework’s definition. It is a suitable location for development, is available, and viable, and is capable of making a significant contribution towards satisfying the Councils’ housing needs during the period to 2038.

Policy wording should be adjusted to indicate that 1200 units is a minimum figure, and flexibility introduced in relation to affordable housing.

Full text:

On behalf of the Consortium of developers comprising Hopkins Homes, Persimmon Homes and Taylor Wimpey (hereafter referred to as ‘The Consortium’), we strongly support the preferred allocation of GNLP0132, Land off Blue Boar Lane/Salhouse Road, White House Farm, Sprowston.

As has already been demonstrated through the Regulation 18 Stage A and B consultations, the site is deliverable in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework’s definition. It is a suitable location for development, is available, and viable, and is capable of making a significant contribution towards satisfying the Councils’ housing needs during the period to 2038.

Confirmation of Deliverability

Suitable
The site has been demonstrated through the information provided during the earlier Regulation 18 consultations to be an entirely suitable location for further development.

Sprowston, as one of the Norwich Fringe Parishes and within the Growth Triangle, is acknowledged as a highly sustainable location, and a preferred location for growth. Residential development here will help support the planned long-term economic growth of the Greater Norwich Area, particularly in the strategic employment locations such as the Norwich Airport area and Broadland Business Park/Broadland Gate, through provision of high-quality and desirable homes within easy reach of these key employment areas.

The scale of development envisaged is such that it will enable the creation of a strong, vibrant and healthy community, with easy access to existing and planned local services and facilities, as well as on-site provision of a secondary school and extensive Green Infrastructure. A wide mix of dwelling types, sizes and tenures will be provided to meet local needs, together with appropriate infrastructure. The site is located in close proximity to established communities on the north-eastern edge of Norwich, which should assist in achieving social integration between the existing and new residents.

The site is located close to a wide range of employment opportunities, and enjoys excellent access to a range of sustainable transport options providing easy access to the extensive array of facilities and services available within Norwich city centre. Development in this location will assist in further enhancing the sustainable transport options available in the area, including the aspiration to create a Bus Rapid Transport corridor along Salhouse Road. Residents will be able to meet their day-to-day needs easily and without the need to use their car, assisting in reducing pollution and minimising the contribution to climate change.

The technical work previously submitted in relation to Archaeology, Ecology, Contaminated Land, Drainage, Trees, Transport and Highways and Utilities demonstrated that there are no technical constraints to delivery of the site.

Available
As previously detailed, an Option Agreement is in place with the landowners, and the site features in the medium- to long-term strategic plans of all three housebuilders, who have a proven track-record of delivery in the area, and are currently actively building and selling houses on the nearby Manor Park development in Sprowston (White House Farm Phase 1 – 1,179 dwellings).

An outline planning application for Phase 2 of the White House Farm development (456 dwellings) was submitted to Broadland District Council in August 2019 and is under consideration at present (2019/1370). The intention is for delivery of the dwellings to continue uninterrupted from Phase 1, onto Phase 2, and thereafter onto Phase 3.

The broad timescales set out in the Delivery Statement submitted in May 2019 remain relevant, and the full quantum of development will be delivered well within the Plan period.

Viable
We remain confident that the delivery of the site is viable having regard to the policy requirements of the draft GNLP and there are no factors that we are aware of, at this moment in time, that could prevent the delivery of the site.

This statement is, however, made in the context of a number of queries that have been raised in relation to Greater Norwich Local Plan Interim Viability Study (2019), the ongoing discussions with the Councils regarding the provision of land for a secondary school within the site, and mindful that consultation on an amended CIL regime is yet to take place.

Comments on proposed Policy wording
The draft Policy wording specifies that “The site is expected to accommodate 1,200 homes, of which 33% will be affordable”. The figure of 1,200 homes is lower than the number of dwellings that the site was originally promoted and demonstrated to be technically deliverable for (1,350), which reflects the Councils’ recent aspirations to secure land for a secondary school within the site. Whilst the Consortium are committed to continued engagement with the Councils on this matter, and are amenable to considering accommodating a secondary school within the site, it is requested that the wording is revised to indicate that this is a minimum (or approximate) figure and not an upper or absolute limit.

In addition, flexibility should be introduced in relation to the level of affordable housing provision. Whilst the site is viable on the basis of current policy requirements, further work is required to understand the implications of accommodating a secondary school, and given the timings of the CIL Review, the policy should provide flexibility to review the percentage of affordable housing, should this be necessary, or should the local need change.

In all other respects, the requirements of the policy are considered generally appropriate. For accuracy, in the second bullet point, ‘Mallard Way’ should be replaced with ‘Atlantic Avenue’. Similarly, the final bullet point contains a typing error and the word ‘approached’ should be replaced with ‘approved’.

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 21571

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

Unlike other allocation policies there is no reference to water efficiency forming part of the design of this student accommodation.

Please also see comments relating to Policy 2 of the Sustainable Communities of the Strategy document.

Full text:

Unlike other allocation policies there is no reference to water efficiency forming part of the design of this student accommodation.

Please also see comments relating to Policy 2 of the Sustainable Communities of the Strategy document.

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 21897

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Mr Oliver Gurney

Agent: Mrs Nicole Wright

Representation Summary:

on behalf of client White House Farm supports this proposed housing allocation.
It will be important to secure a strategic buffer around White House Farm in the masterplan proposals for this allocation.

Full text:

On behalf of Nicole Wright, please find attached response form in relation to GNLP sites 3024 and 0132 with regards to the regulation 18 draft plan consultation.

SITE GNLP3024:
2018 Submission form amendments proposed (as attached)
• 4c - 20160106
• 9a - to 1-5 years
• 11a up to 5 years.

We currently have a thriving hub of local businesses
(planning application No. 20160106).

There are currently 38 employees on the site at any one
time during the day (it was 13, 4 years ago), and with the
increased proposed development we hope to dramatically increase the no. of jobs available on the site. We aim to employ local residents wherever possible.

We have very keen interest from the the following
established businesses to join or expand on the site as soon as possible. We have been in discussions with these operators for over 12 months.
• children's nursery
• Play barn operator
• Gym and fitness
• Dance
• Restaurant
• Cafe
• Gift
• Interior design
• Health and beauty
• Office based businesses.
• A selection of independent retailers.

White House Farm would like to take on the house building consortium's obligation (from the Phase 2 land) to provide a Local Centre at White House Farm. White House Farm is ideally placed to provide a brilliant central location for these local amenities and is in discussion with Persimmon on this matter.

White House Farm has a fantastic natural buffer from the
proposed Phase 2 housing in the form of established
woodland. It will be important to secure a strategic buffer
around the entire site in the masterplan proposals for
adjacent land.

SITE GNLP0132
White House Farm supports this proposed allocation.

It will be important to secure a strategic buffer around White House Farm in the masterplan proposals for this allocation. -

Object

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 22013

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: The Woodland Trust

Representation Summary:

The Woodland Trust is concerned about site allocation GNLP0132 (Land off Blue Boar Lane/Salhouse Road White House Farm) which has been included in the GNLP Sites Plan, as this could lead to the damage of an ancient woodland known as Bulmer Coppice.

Site allocation GNLP0132 is identified for large scale development, and as such the minimum 15m buffer recommendation would not be effective in ensuring that the ancient woodland within the site is not affected by potential future development. The Trust would generally recommend a 50 metre buffer to the ancient woodland for a development of this scale, subject to detailed proposals including site layout.

Conclusion
The Trust is concerned about the potentially adverse impacts that the proposed site allocation GNLP0132 will have in relation to an area of ancient woodland known as Bulmer Coppice. Ancient woodland should not be included in areas that are allocated for development, whether for residential, leisure or community purposes as this leaves them open to the impacts of development.
The Woodland Trust objects to the inclusion of this site allocation in the GNLP Sites Plan, as it is likely to cause damage to an area of ancient woodland within its boundaries. For this reason we believe the site is unsound and should not be taken forward. Secondary woodland should also be retained to ensure that ecological networks are maintained and enhanced.

(See attached for full submission)

Full text:

Please find attached the Woodland Trust’s comments on the Greater Norwich Local Plan Sites Plan.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 22073

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust

Representation Summary:

Our comments below relate to specific ecological concerns regarding allocations. In addition to the protection provided in Policy 2, we recommend that specific wording is included in the allocation policies to ensure they are properly addressed at the planning application stage. Any applications in proximity to known wildlife sites (as set out in Table 4), as well as irreplaceable habitats such as ancient woodland, and priority habitats (as set out in the NERC Act 2016) should be accompanied by an ecological appraisal, with provision of biodiversity net gain and sufficient buffering and safeguarding space secured between the development and the wildlife site in perpetuity (potentially also delivering contributions to green infrastructure).
GNLP0132 – this site includes an area of ancient woodland in the south-west corner of the proposed allocation. This area should be safeguarded through sufficient buffering (at least 50m, preferably 100m, in line with Woodland Trust guidance ).

Full text:

Thank you for consulting Norfolk Wildlife Trust on the draft Greater Norwich Local Plan. We have attempted to comment wherever possible in response to the questions set out in the consultation, but have a number of comments which cover multiple policies or supporting documents and so have compiled our comments in this letter.
See attached for full submission

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 22214

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Environment Agency (Eastern Region)

Representation Summary:

Many other sites intersect water courses (e.g. GNLP0264, GNLP3024, and GNLP0132), they should undertake a WFD compliance assessment for the watercourse receiving the runoff, maintain a buffer of 20 m between the watercourse and gardens and secure opportunities for riparian habitat restoration.

Full text:

Please see attached for full submission

Attachments:

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 22602

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Although Rackheath Hall, grade II listed lies to the east of the site, the intervening vegetation should provide a suitable buffer. We welcome the reference to the historic parkland and need for protection of trees in bullet point 5.

Full text:

For full representation, please refer to attached documents