GNLP2106
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20916
Received: 13/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Anthony Brandish
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
I fully support the decision that gnlp 2106 is an unreasonable alternitive site,the proposed development would have had a detremental effect on the Wensum Valley particually the county wildlife and special scientific sites. To quote a well used phrase it would be "a blot on the landscape." When taking this into consideration plus the added strain on the already overburdened infrascrucure it makes gnlp 2106 clearly unsuitable for development at present or in the future.
I fully support the decision that gnlp 2106 is an unreasonable alternitive site,the proposed development would have had a detremental effect on the Wensum Valley particually the county wildlife and special scientific sites. To quote a well used phrase it would be "a blot on the landscape." When taking this into consideration plus the added strain on the already overburdened infrascrucure it makes gnlp 2106 clearly unsuitable for development at present or in the future.