GNLP0436

Support

Representation ID: 20259

Received: 27/02/2020

Respondent: Carole Andrews

Comment supports site being unreasonable.
I am writing this email to you regarding the development on the land east of the memorial hall Brundall.
I live in Brundall and I can say the land was proposed by Quantum for the building of several houses and as I understand recreation.
I would like to point out if this proposal went ahead the pressure it would put on the village of Brundall. The school for example, the doctors surgery, the local shops, the traffic through the village. I think it’s ludicrous to even think of building so many homes and expecting an already stressed environment to cope with the extra demand. Not only that building on this land would devastate a beautiful area. A quiet peaceful area. I appeal to you to reject the appeal made by quantum. So that the residents of Brundall can enjoy the beautiful land east of the memorial hall.

Support

Representation ID: 20473

Received: 07/03/2020

Respondent: Mr Edward Wozniakowski

land already deemed unsuitable.not enough infrastructure to support more homes.

Support

Representation ID: 20474

Received: 07/03/2020

Respondent: Mrs RUTH WOZNIAKOWSKI

land already deemed unsuitable. not enough infrastructure to support new homes.

Support

Representation ID: 20554

Received: 10/03/2020

Respondent: Brundall Parish Council

Brundall Parish Council Supports the GNLP recommendation that this site (GNLP0436) is an unreasonable site.

Support

Representation ID: 20751

Received: 12/03/2020

Respondent: Mrs Merri Ryan

This entire area should be left free of housing development. There are many reasons, but my primary objection would be access and the resultant huge impact on further vehicular traffic into and through the village of Brundall.

I am not averse to the careful and sensitive provision of recreational/park development on a portion of this land but the 'open space' aspect should prevail.

Support

Representation ID: 21429

Received: 12/03/2020

Respondent: Mrs Marianne Gibbs

Comment supports site being considered unreasonable.

I want to support the council in its plan to keep the land to the East of the Memorial Hall in Brundall for recreation.
We have had more than enough housing in Brundall already. We are short of recreation land.
The land to the East of the Memorial hall should not be built on but allocated for recreation.

Object

Representation ID: 22098

Received: 13/03/2020

Respondent: Quantum Land

Agent: Barton Willmore

In the “site assessment booklet for Brundall”, site GNLP0436 is land to the east of Links Avenue and the Memorial Hall. This site is subject to an on-going appeal. The site was recommended for approval by planning officers (July 2019). The committee report notes that no technical objections were received and Norfolk County Council and Highways England raised no objection to the scheme. No heritage or landscape concerns were identified. It was noted that significant benefit would be derived from the scheme for green infrastructure, including formal and informal open space, and habitat creation and enhancement of biodiversity. Planning committee refused the application, principle on the basis of a lack of need for additional housing, since they considered they could show a 5YHL supply. The appeal will be heard in April 2020 and a decision is expected by the end of June 2020.
It is noted that the assessment booklet confirms, under Stage 5, that the site is a “reasonable alternative” for “up to 250 dwellings, open space, recreation and leisure uses”.
Under Stage 6, “Detailed assessments of reasonable alternatives”, it is noted that the application is (it has now been) to go to planning committee with a likely recommendation to approve.
Under Stage 7, it is said:
“After further consideration, there are no sites preferred for allocation in the Brundall cluster. There remain high levels of existing commitments which are as yet undeveloped, and it has not been possible to find ways to overcome infrastructure constraints, including access to the A47. These constraints are considered to limit the potential for additional housing at this stage, meaning there are no reasonable alternative sites either.”
Cleary this is not the case in respect of Brundall. Site GNLP0436 is technically acceptable.