GNLP0131

Comment

Representation ID: 19877

Received: 08/02/2020

Respondent: Mr Ken Barnes

I totally support your recommendation and in addition as you don't recommend any new sites in Poringland I don't see how you could recommend sites in Caistor St edmund

Support

Representation ID: 20015

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Miss Sarah Mann

I agree this site is unsuitable this area has had far beyond its fair share of development already with no growth or support for the infrastructure, it can not take anymore, the schools are beyond full, the doctors are beyond full, the roads are beyond full. The road network around this site could not cope with such development.

Support

Representation ID: 20169

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0131 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.

Support

Representation ID: 21425

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Mr Chris Troise

I support the view that this site is not considered suitable for allocation.
There are already significant planning permissions on small sites across this key service centre in the GNLP which are sufficient to provide its fair contribution to the overall numbers required.
Large and small scale developments in this key service centre including several rural parishes during recent years have been such that there has been significant disruption to the lives of ordinary residents.
I cannot comment on every site in the area but, to summarise, I oppose any allocation of further sites in this key service centre.