GNLP0589 A & B
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20166
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports sites GNLP0589 (a and b) as being unreasonable sites, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.
Poringland Parish Council supports sites GNLP0589 (a and b) as being unreasonable sites, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20684
Received: 11/03/2020
Respondent: John Long Planning
John Long Planning represents Hibbett & Key Ltd and they have asked me to respond in relation to land they are promoting for development in Framingham Earl/Pigot.
Hibbett&Key support the identification of Poringland/Framingham Earl as a Key Service Centre. However, they object to the decision not to allocate any further sites in this Key Service Centre. They suggest that the Local Plan should allocate land for development in Poringland/Framingham Earl(Pigot) and confirm their site(s) at Pigot Lane remain available for development.
John Long Planning represents Hibbett & Key Ltd and they have asked me to respond in relation to land they are promoting for development in Framingham Earl/Pigot.
Hibbett&Key support the identification of Poringland/Framingham Earl as a Key Service Centre. However, they object to the decision not to allocate any further sites in this Key Service Centre. They suggest that the Local Plan should allocate land for development in Poringland/Framingham Earl(Pigot) and confirm their site(s) at Pigot Lane remain available for development.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20806
Received: 12/03/2020
Respondent: John Long Planning
Hibbett & Key Ltd object to lack of any 'new' allocations in Poringland/Framingham Earl. This Key Service Centre should have additional land allocated. Site GNLP0589A&B should be in primary position for allocation as it has been assessed as being well related to the village and suitable in all other regards. The only reason for not allocating it, is because no sites are being allocated. The other assessed sites in Poringland/Framingham Earl all have additional reasons for them not being allocated. If the decision is taken to allocate further sites, site GNLP0589A&B should be allocated as it performs the best.
John Long Planning Ltd represents Hibbett & Key Ltd who are promoting land for development North and South of Pigot Lane, Framingham Earl/Pigot. ref: GNLP0589A&B.
Hibbett & Key Ltd object to the decision not to allocate any further sites in Poringland/Framingham Earl. This Key Service Centre should have additional land allocated for residential development. Hibbett & Key Ltd note that the assessment of site GNLP0589 A&B confirms the site is well related to the village and the only reasons for not allocating it, is because there are other commitments in the village and no new allocations are being made.
The other assessed sites in Poringland/Framingham Earl all have additional reasons for them not being allocated. Hibbett & Key Ltd suggest that if a decision is taken to allocate further sites in this Key Service Centre, site GNLP0589A&B appears to out perform the other promoted sites and should therefore be in prime position for allocation. Hibbett & Key Ltd confirm the site remains available for development should it be needed.