GNLP2093
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 19897
Received: 10/02/2020
Respondent: Mr DAVID GOODERHAM
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable)
This land is a significant flood risk as has been demonstrated by the problems associated with development by David Wilson Homes on the adjoining site. Any further development would aslo exacerbate what is already a real issue with traffic joining the Norwich Road.
This land is a significant flood risk as has been demonstrated by the problems associated with development by David Wilson Homes on the adjoining site. Any further development would aslo exacerbate what is already a real issue with traffic joining the Norwich Road.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20173
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP2093 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP2093 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21168
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Mr john Phillips
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
I object to this site for the reasons already stated. This would be next door to a recent development which has already put great strain on Caistor Lane which is a country road. This road already carries dangerous levels of traffic due to overdevelopment in the Poringland area. Covering this area with concrete would also have a major impact on drainage which is already very poor, the area being heavy clay soil.
I object to this site for the reasons already stated. This would be next door to a recent development which has already put great strain on Caistor Lane which is a country road. This road already carries dangerous levels of traffic due to overdevelopment in the Poringland area. Covering this area with concrete would also have a major impact on drainage which is already very poor, the area being heavy clay soil.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21436
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Chris Troise
I support the view that this site is not considered suitable for allocation.
There are already significant planning permissions on small sites across this key service centre in the GNLP which are sufficient to provide its fair contribution to the overall numbers required.
Large and small scale developments in this key service centre including several rural parishes during recent years have been such that there has been significant disruption to the lives of ordinary residents.
I cannot comment on every site in the area but, to summarise, I oppose any allocation of further sites in this key service centre.
I support the view that this site is not considered suitable for allocation.
There are already significant planning permissions on small sites across this key service centre in the GNLP which are sufficient to provide its fair contribution to the overall numbers required.
Large and small scale developments in this key service centre including several rural parishes during recent years have been such that there has been significant disruption to the lives of ordinary residents.
I cannot comment on every site in the area but, to summarise, I oppose any allocation of further sites in this key service centre.