GNLP3016
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20416
Received: 06/03/2020
Respondent: Karen Lawrence
Would like to have seen this site endorsed by the GNDP, understand the comments made but this site would be a very positive development for the village. Would like to see it classified as "existing allocation" or "reasonable alternative" to be carried forward through normal planning process and proceedure, rather than classified as it is here as an "unreasonable site". With its current classification it looks as if this site is not considered reasonable for development going forward which is not the case - its very suitable, where as the other sites in this same group are definately not.
Would like to have seen this site endorsed by the GNDP, understand the comments made but this site would be a very positive development for the village. Would like to see it classified as "existing allocation" or "reasonable alternative" to be carried forward through normal planning process and proceedure, rather than classified as it is here as an "unreasonable site". With its current classification it looks as if this site is not considered reasonable for development going forward which is not the case - its very suitable, where as the other sites in this same group are definately not.