COL2
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20369
Received: 05/03/2020
Respondent: Mr John Shirley
This site was originally proposed in the BDC 2011 consultation. It was later considered less suitable than COL1. Site COL1 at that time' we were told, was outside the village development limit and had Highways issues on Rectory Road.
Overall I do not feel that any development on this side of the River Bure is appropriate, but if there has to be any, a carefully designed scheme on this site is preferable to desecrating greenfield sites and leaving an ex-scrapyard in the centre of a lovely but increasingly traffic bruised village.
This site was originally proposed in the BDC 2011 consultation. It was later considered less suitable than COL1. Site COL1 at that time' we were told, was outside the village development limit and had Highways issues on Rectory Road.
Overall I do not feel that any development on this side of the River Bure is appropriate, but if there has to be any, a carefully designed scheme on this site is preferable to desecrating greenfield sites and leaving an ex-scrapyard in the centre of a lovely but increasingly traffic bruised village.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20696
Received: 11/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Helen Gregson
An already busy road,with limited parking, and close to a school will become even busier. The local school and Dr’s surgery are already at capacity.
An already busy road,with limited parking, and close to a school will become even busier. The local school and Dr’s surgery are already at capacity.
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21661
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd
Unlike other allocation policies there is no reference to water efficiency forming part of the design
Please also see comments relating to Policy 2 of the Sustainable Communities of the Strategy document.
Unlike other allocation policies there is no reference to water efficiency forming part of the design
Please also see comments relating to Policy 2 of the Sustainable Communities of the Strategy document.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 22615
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Whilst there are no designated heritage assets within the site boundary, there is a grade II listed limekiln just to the north east of the site and the Coltishall and Horstead Conservation Area and its associated listed buildings lies to the south of the site. Any development of the site has the potential to impact upon the setting of these heritage assets. There is currently no mention of the Conservation Area and listed buildings within the policy or supporting text or of the requirement to conserve and enhance the significance of these heritage assets.
Suggested Change:
Amend the policy and supporting text to make reference to the Lime Kiln and Coltishall and Horstead Conservation Area and associated listed buildings and the need to conserve and enhance the significance of the heritage assets (including any contribution made to that significance by setting).
For full representation, please refer to attached documents