GNLP0059
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20575
Received: 10/03/2020
Respondent: Miss Sarah Dugdell
(Changed from objet to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
Whilst Dog Lane is able to cope with the vehicuar traffic it sees now, I do not believe there is scope for larger developments includng commercial. This would be to the detriment of a small and winding lane. Bramley Lakes is situated at the far end of Dog lane, so all other properties would need to be passed in order to reach the destination. Moreover, the junction with the B1149 really should not be seeing any further traffic given the through traffic the B1149 currently carries and will carry in the future.
Whilst Dog Lane is able to cope with the vehicuar traffic it sees now, I do not believe there is scope for larger developments includng commercial. This would be to the detriment of a small and winding lane. Bramley Lakes is situated at the far end of Dog lane, so all other properties would need to be passed in order to reach the destination. Moreover, the junction with the B1149 really should not be seeing any further traffic given the through traffic the B1149 currently carries and will carry in the future.