GNLP2021

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 20454

Received: 07/03/2020

Respondent: Mrs Adrienne Collard

Representation Summary:

(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)

There is now sufficient development at Newton St Faith there is no need ruin the village with more and more estates.

Full text:

There is now sufficient development at Newton St Faith there is no need ruin the village with more and more estates.

Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 21555

Received: 16/03/2020

Respondent: Brown & Co

Representation Summary:

Whilst the overall strategy for village clusters contained in Policy 7.4 is supported, we believe that GNLP2021 and the additional land identified should be included as part of the delivery of growth in this part of Greater Norwich. The sites would offer an opportunity to deliver additional housing growth in a highly sustainable area. In particular the land between Meadow Farm Lane and Coltishall Lane is well related to the built form of the village and would form a logical extension to the built form.

Full text:

Whilst the overall strategy for village clusters contained in Policy 7.4 is supported, we believe that GNLP2021 and the additional land identified should be included as part of the delivery of growth in this part of Greater Norwich. The sites would offer an opportunity to deliver additional housing growth in a highly sustainable area. In particular the land between Meadow Farm Lane and Coltishall Lane is well related to the built form of the village and would form a logical extension to the built form.