GNLP2030
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20455
Received: 07/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs Adrienne Collard
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
The Warren had recently had a small development a lot of the area surrounding the Warren is waterlogged and marshy. The infrastructure will have difficulty maintaining further developement.
The Warren had recently had a small development a lot of the area surrounding the Warren is waterlogged and marshy. The infrastructure will have difficulty maintaining further developement.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20966
Received: 14/03/2020
Respondent: Mrs judy Fisher
(Changed from support to object as respondent is actually objecting to the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
I have lived in this village for 67 years and this site has never flooded. Circle housing developed part of this site in 2012 installing additional drainage and have left provision for access for the rest of this site for additional housing in the future. They had the pick of the original site and we asked that they build near the school. We cannot understand why the additional land is unsuitable for development given the contours of the site are exactly the same. Mature trees to be retained. Is private development less important than Social Housing!!
I have lived in this village for 67 years and this site has never flooded. Circle housing developed part of this site in 2012 installing additional drainage and have left provision for access for the rest of this site for additional housing in the future. They had the pick of the original site and we asked that they build near the school. We cannot understand why the additional land is unsuitable for development given the contours of the site are exactly the same. Mature trees to be retained. Is private development less important than Social Housing!!