GNLP0449
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20230
Received: 02/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Christopher Entwistle
There is a lack of local amenities to support development at the key visual western arrival to our village. There will be too much traffic as residents have to make longer journeys to amenities such as doctors, shops and schools as existing facilities are lacking and generally too far to walk to. The roads are narrow and prone to surface water, there is a shortage of pavement and risk of increased traffic accidents on unsuitable existing roads. We seek to become carbon neutral by 2050. Currently takes a long time to safely access the A47 with current volume of traffic.
There is a lack of local amenities to support development at the key visual western arrival to our village. There will be too much traffic as residents have to make longer journeys to amenities such as doctors, shops and schools as existing facilities are lacking and generally too far to walk to. The roads are narrow and prone to surface water, there is a shortage of pavement and risk of increased traffic accidents on unsuitable existing roads. We seek to become carbon neutral by 2050. Currently takes a long time to safely access the A47 with current volume of traffic.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20281
Received: 04/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Michael Jay
I would like to object to building on this land because it is not in keeping with the small village rural character of strumpshaw. I feel the roads and access to these sites in strumpshaw are not suitable to be safely used by the large increase in construction and residential traffic that would be created.
I would like to object to building on this land because it is not in keeping with the small village rural character of strumpshaw. I feel the roads and access to these sites in strumpshaw are not suitable to be safely used by the large increase in construction and residential traffic that would be created.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20325
Received: 04/03/2020
Respondent: Mr william Burroughs
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
STRUMPSHAW does not have services & facilities no school no shops new residents would have to drive to the facilities the existing roads are narrow with restricted width There are no street lights not a complete footpath the main sewer is under sized and over flows from manholes when we have heavy rain resulting in flooding To provide all required would impact on character of the rural landscape
STRUMPSHAW does not have services & facilities no school no shops new residents would have to drive to the facilities the existing roads are narrow with restricted width There are no street lights not a complete footpath the main sewer is under sized and over flows from manholes when we have heavy rain resulting in flooding To provide all required would impact on character of the rural landscape
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20886
Received: 13/03/2020
Respondent: Lingwood and Burlingham Parish Council
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
GNLP0499 - Lingwood & Burlingham Parish Council object to this site as it is too far outside the Parish Boundary.
GNLP0499 - Lingwood & Burlingham Parish Council object to this site as it is too far outside the Parish Boundary.
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21023
Received: 15/03/2020
Respondent: Dr Michael Green
I agree with Broadland DC and object to this property being developed for the reasons given (inadequate facilities and infrastructure in village to support additional village development of this size and nature) and additionally because:
- this plot is contrary to Village Neighbourhood Plan and totally undermines the community's integrity with respect to planning processes.
I agree with Broadland DC and object to this property being developed for the reasons given (inadequate facilities and infrastructure in village to support additional village development of this size and nature) and additionally because:
- this plot is contrary to Village Neighbourhood Plan and totally undermines the community's integrity with respect to planning processes.