Brooke – BKE3
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 21697
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd
Unlike other allocation policies there is no reference to water efficiency forming part of the design
Please also see comments relating to Policy 2 of the Sustainable Communities of the Strategy document.
Unlike other allocation policies there is no reference to water efficiency forming part of the design
Please also see comments relating to Policy 2 of the Sustainable Communities of the Strategy document.
Comment
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 22086
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Norfolk Wildlife Trust
Our comments below relate to specific ecological concerns regarding allocations. In addition to the protection provided in Policy 2, we recommend that specific wording is included in the allocation policies to ensure they are properly addressed at the planning application stage. Any applications in proximity to known wildlife sites (as set out in Table 4), as well as irreplaceable habitats such as ancient woodland, and priority habitats (as set out in the NERC Act 2016) should be accompanied by an ecological appraisal, with provision of biodiversity net gain and sufficient buffering and safeguarding space secured between the development and the wildlife site in perpetuity (potentially also delivering contributions to green infrastructure).
BKE3 – this allocation appears to overlap with Atlas Gravel Workings CWS and needs further clarification.
Thank you for consulting Norfolk Wildlife Trust on the draft Greater Norwich Local Plan. We have attempted to comment wherever possible in response to the questions set out in the consultation, but have a number of comments which cover multiple policies or supporting documents and so have compiled our comments in this letter.
See attached for full submission
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 22626
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Historic England
Arlington Hall grade II listed lies to the east of the site. Whilst we welcome reference to landscaping along the southern boundary, the boundary treatment along the north east of the site is also considered important.
Suggested Change:
Amend bullet point to reference all boundary treatment and setting of listed buildings.
For full representation, please refer to attached documents