26

Object

Representation ID: 24603

Received: 17/02/2023

Respondent: Mr Gavin Buxton

the approvals are a joke and clearly conducted during a quiet time of day to allow for an unrealistic appraisal of the site.

Access is blocked by school traffic. Also, cars being parked on-road as residents have no other option.
The village already floods multiple times a year due to ineffective drainage and water connections for the people already living here.

We have native bats, a heron breeding programme, newts, otters and more in our village. No way can anything be added to impair their habitats.

Object

Representation ID: 24625

Received: 22/02/2023

Respondent: Miss Holly Tudor

This traveller and gypsy site would make access for dog walkers to the water meadow difficult.
Use of calor gas on the site would be dangerous.
The road gets contested due to a school close by and parents using this area to turn their cars around.
It is on the boundaries of a conservation site.
We have lots of wildlife that use the area as habitat.
Within a built up residential area, which are mainly occupied by elderly people.
Noise would be an issue.
Flooding and poor sewage works.
Regular burst water mains.

Object

Representation ID: 24627

Received: 22/02/2023

Respondent: Mrs Daphne Fisk

Appropriate sites close by such as Ketteringham Depot.
No privacy due to built up residential area.
Regular use of water meadow by dog walkers and nature photographers.
Situated next to a meadow that floods very badly.
Poor sewers.
Protected species found to be living close by.
Busy road due to school and parents collecting. Also tight squeeze for bin collections and deliveries.
Sites historically being left in a state of disrepair.
Use of calor gas close to bonfires and the main gas line to Bowthorpe under proposed site.
Noise problems.
Access is on a private road which needs work.

Object

Representation ID: 24717

Received: 02/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Mark Allison

GNLP5009 Bawburgh. This 'favoured' site is clearly far less favourable than some of the sites deemed 'unreasonable'. Where is the common sense??. To consider a site at the end of a residential cul-de-sac, close to a primary school, on top of a gas main, alongside a conservation area, with zero local amenities and very narrow access is ludicrous. The Bawburgh site is only 'favoured' because the landowner will gift it to the council in return for positive consideration of other development opportunities. There is a perfectly adequate existing site next to the park&ride on Long Lane in Bawburgh.

Object

Representation ID: 24776

Received: 06/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Kay Hipperson

Danger due to Calor gas use.
Poor access due to narrow road and private access which would need to be changed.
The site also would not support environmental sustainability or the amount of wildlife located in the area.
The amount of people that come and go would not give appropriate privacy for the gypsy and traveller families, especially with the road being used by parked cars and parents picking up the children from the school.
I believe that while there is a site like Kettringham Depot available, there would be no need for Bawburgh to be approved.

Object

Representation ID: 24781

Received: 06/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Watchorn

GNLP5009 Bawburgh. Traffic flow with constant speeding. access road would be near the school and the road are not wide enough. Parents already have problems with parking. Environmental issues such as flooding in field next to the proposed plan. Situated on top of a gas main. School is at capacity with no financial capability to expand. The cul de sac is the only safe place for our children to ride their bikes, scooter etc taking this away would be detrimental to the village children. no amenities, no bus, paths etc.

Object

Representation ID: 24835

Received: 08/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Christopher Charles

Reading the many reports provides on this website I have to question the quality and accuracy of the information provided to support the consultation. There are a number of errors identified in the attachments which are being used to support decisions.
This information is in the public domain and begins to question the quality and accuracy of the rest of the report for other assessments of sites. The consultants providing this report should be questioned in terms of their ability. This inaccurate data is being used to make significant decisions for the GNLP and should be revisited for fact checking.

Object

Representation ID: 24917

Received: 13/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Mary Greenhall

1) Pressures on the Public Services including; Police; Schooling; Medical establishments.
2)Danger to the Travellers because of proximity to the A47; Narrow unlit country Lanes
3) Cost of providing the infrastructure to the Tax payer with no mains sewerage, water, electricity and communications currently in place.
4) Damage to the environment; Light pollution due new housing and street lighting; Developing on Brown Belt Land