GNLP0460

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13258

Received: 24/02/2018

Respondent: weston longville parish council

Representation:

Site cannot relate itself to existing communities and is an example of urban sprawl into a greenfield area.
Correction to Attlebridge community description - there is no village hall.

Full text:

Site cannot relate itself to existing communities and is an example of urban sprawl into a greenfield area.
Correction to Attlebridge community description - there is no village hall.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14675

Received: 20/03/2018

Respondent: Norfolk Geodiversity Partnership

Representation:

Objection on the grounds of negative impact on landscape character of the Attlebridge Hills and Wensum Valley. Also, the site includes a chalk pit of geological interest, listed in the Norfolk Geodiversity Audit as site BRL01 and subject of geological research since the 19th century (Blake 1888, Wood 1988). If development were granted we request that plans be made conditional upon providing geological exposures of chalk as part of a nature conservation area as part of Green Infrastructure.

Full text:

We wish to object to this site proposal on the grounds of its negative impact on the landscape character and countryside setting of the Attlebridge Hills and the Wensum Valley.

Also, we note that this site includes a chalk pit of geological interest, listed in the Norfolk Geodiversity Audit as site BRL01. It has been subject of geological research since the 19th century as a significant local exposure of the Cretacous Campanian chalk of the Gonioteuthis quadrata zone, with many flints and a few paramoudras (Blake 1888) and a rich fossil fauna recorded by Rhodes and Rowe (see Wood, C (1988). 'The Stratigraphy of the Chalk of Norwich'. Bull Geol Soc Norfolk, no. 38).

However, if development were granted we request that plans be made conditional upon providing geological exposures of chalk as part of a nature conservation area. These could meaningfully be included as a valuable part of Green Infrastructure provision, and would conserve the site's geological as well as wildlife interest.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15552

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Paul Woolnough

Representation:

Am familiar with planning matters and consultations such as this one.

No infrastructure other than the NDR and proposed link road to the A47.

No justification for such a development noting Broadland planning policies and the NPPF.

Full text:

Am familiar with planning matters and consultations such as this one.

No infrastructure other than the NDR and proposed link road to the A47.

No justification for such a development noting Broadland planning policies and the NPPF.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15910

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Brett Walker

Representation:

1. Would prejudice a 'no development' policy along the NDR. A key objective of the NDR was to free traffic on the radial roads to and from the City and allow the sustainable transport measures in the NDR DCO.
2. Isolated, piecemeal, sporadic.

Full text:

1. Would prejudice a 'no development' policy along the NDR. A key objective of the NDR was to free traffic on the radial roads to and from the City and allow the sustainable transport measures in the NDR DCO.
2. Isolated, piecemeal, sporadic.