GNLP0134
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14266
Received: 17/03/2018
Respondent: Great and Little Plumstead Parish Council
The Parish Council objects to this site allocation. The Parish does not have the infrastructure to support this number of houses. The location of the site makes it dangerous for vehicles exiting as previously stated.
As with site GNLP0483 this site would exit onto two main and busy roads. Traffic is already an issue and this would only make the problem worse.
This allocation goes against the "Service Village" designation which Little Plumstead has. This allocation states that developments should not exceed 20 dwellings.
Using this land for development is taking it from agricultural land.
This area of Little Plumstead has a lack of infrastructure at present. The Primary School is located at the other end of the village and is already at capacity. There is no doctors located within the Parish, the nearest in in Thorpe St Andrew/Blofield.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15964
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Peter Morris
I support the Parish Councils objection. The recent public exhibition for a speculative development indicated far more dwellings and on a smaller site.
The development is outside the village boundary as shown in the Village Plan.
I support the Parish Councils objection. The recent public exhibition for a speculative development indicated far more dwellings and on a smaller site.
The development is outside the village boundary as shown in the Village Plan.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15978
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Peter Morris
I support the Parish Councils comments. The site has been put forward for a speculative development and showed a smaller area with more dwellings. It is outside the village development boundary as shown in the Village plan which appears to have been ignored.
I support the Parish Councils comments. The site has been put forward for a speculative development and showed a smaller area with more dwellings. It is outside the village development boundary as shown in the Village plan which appears to have been ignored.