GNLP1020
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13096
Received: 19/02/2018
Respondent: Miss Carol Green
This land is allocated for a much needed new burial ground, a designation which should not be changed.
This land is allocated for a much needed new burial ground, a designation which should not be changed.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13149
Received: 20/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Paul Toseland
Designated burial ground already
Designated burial ground already
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13431
Received: 01/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Richard Grady
This is allocated for a new burial ground and any change to this designation should be strongly resisted
This is allocated for a new burial ground and any change to this designation should be strongly resisted
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15099
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Hellesdon Parish Council
Designation as a burial ground should not be changed
Designation as a burial ground should not be changed
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16010
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Graham Everett
Fully support as use for burial land
Fully support as use for burial land
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16032
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Ursula Franklin
as this is land allocated for a new burial ground it is definitely unsuitable
as this is land allocated for a new burial ground it is definitely unsuitable
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16130
Received: 26/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Jane Woods
These areas are not suitable for the proposed buildings because they would put pressure on Hellesdon medical practice and other facilities in Hellesdon.
They would cause traffic problems for the already busy roads of Hellesdon and would be dangerous for vehicles joining the main roads. The loss of habitat for wildlife should also be considered before building on our countryside.
SITE REF: GNLP0289, 0290, 0301, 0302, 0329, 0332, 0333, 0334, 0381, 0419, 0500, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1061.
These areas are not suitable for the proposed buildings because they would put pressure on Hellesdon medical practice and other facilities in Hellesdon.
They would cause traffic problems for the already busy roads of Hellesdon and would be dangerous for vehicles joining the main roads. The loss of habitat for wildlife should also be considered before building on our countryside.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16253
Received: 24/02/2018
Respondent: Mrs Wendy Maxwell
GNLP1020 - This land is to be kept for a new burial ground.
Hellesdon needs more green areas with the loss of the golf course, this will make a huge gap. Traffic and pollution is bad. Doctors, chemists ad others will be over subscribed, including the schools. Someone needs to stand up for Hellesdon VILLAGE.
GNLP1019 - this land is recreational and should never be built on.
GNLP1020 - This land is to be kept for a new burial ground.
GNLP1019/GNLP1021- There are major traffic problems in this area already.
GNLP0289/GNLP0290/GNLP0301 - Detrimental to landscape, rare plants and wildlife grow in this wood.
Hellesdon needs more green areas with the loss of the golf course, this will make a huge gap. Traffic and pollution is bad. Doctors, chemists ad others will be over subscribed, including the schools. Someone needs to stand up for Hellesdon VILLAGE.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16495
Received: 28/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Neil Collins
A cemetery application was turned down because of bad access and egress to the site, also because of Norwich Airport. Take off flight lines, remember the aircraft crash years ago. The planning applications to build houses on any of the land owned by R.G Carter is complete madness and detrimental to public safety.
GNLP 0298/ 0290/ 0301/ 0329/ 0302/ 0332/ 0333/ 0334/ 0419/ 0381
I agree with all Hellesdon Parish Council comments regarding the loss of green space, the environmental impact, pressure on already stretched Hellesdon infrastructure, amenities and the already and existing traffic problems in spite of the 'NDR'. I strongly object to any of the above!!
GNLP 1020 A cemetery application was turned down because of bad access and egress to the site, also because of Norwich Airport. Take off flight lines, remember the aircraft crash years ago. The planning applications to build houses on any of the land owned by R.G Carter is complete madness and detrimental to public safety.