GNLP0125
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 12815
Received: 16/01/2018
Respondent: Horsham and Newton St Faiths Parish Council
The Parish Council completely rejects this as being totally incompatible with the existing settlement and would not be supported by the current infrastructure.
The Parish Council completely rejects this as being totally incompatible with the existing settlement and would not be supported by the current infrastructure.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14259
Received: 17/03/2018
Respondent: Cllr Dan Roper
This proposal would represent a 50% increase in the size of the Parish. This is wholly excessive and would have a huge impact on the local community. There is insufficient local infrastructure to support such a development.
An increase in the size of the village would add pressure on the junction to the A140
This proposal would represent a 50% increase in the size of the Parish. This is wholly excessive and would have a huge impact on the local community. There is insufficient local infrastructure to support such a development.
An increase in the size of the village would add pressure on the junction to the A140
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14260
Received: 17/03/2018
Respondent: Cllr Dan Roper
A development of this size if totally disproportionate and would have a detrimental impact on the character of the village. This development would represent a 50% increase in the size of the Parish. There is insufficient local infrastructure to support a development of this size.
There would be additional pressure on the junction of the A140.
A development of this size if totally disproportionate and would have a detrimental impact on the character of the village. This development would represent a 50% increase in the size of the Parish. There is insufficient local infrastructure to support a development of this size.
There would be additional pressure on the junction of the A140.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14851
Received: 20/03/2018
Respondent: Dencora Ltd
Agent: Mr Michael Haslam
We wish to confirm our support for the allocation of the site in the forthcoming local plan, that it is available for development and the developer recognises that there are a number of constraints that will need to be properly addressed in any subsequent planning application.
We wish to confirm our support for the allocation of the site in the forthcoming local plan, that it is available for development and the developer recognises that there are a number of constraints that will need to be properly addressed in any subsequent planning application.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15449
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mr R Manning
Way too many dwellings suggested for this area. The increase in traffic alone would be very difficult to manage.
Way too many dwellings suggested for this area. The increase in traffic alone would be very difficult to manage.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16009
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Brett Walker
Would prejudice a 'no development' policy near the NDR. A key objective of the NDR was to free traffic on the radial roads to and from the City and allow the sustainable transport measures in the NDR DCO.
Would prejudice a 'no development' policy near the NDR. A key objective of the NDR was to free traffic on the radial roads to and from the City and allow the sustainable transport measures in the NDR DCO.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 19667
Received: 14/12/2018
Respondent: Abel Homes
Agent: Bidwells
See additional supporting information in relation to GNLP0125 - Land to the East of the A140, Horsham St Faith, Submitted during Stage B Consultation
See Attachments, Submitted during Stage B Consultation