GNLP0221

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13911

Received: 13/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Keith Bunn

Representation:

Reepham might look pretty on a postcard but the reality is that it is poorly-served by public transport and remote from employment centres. Any future developments sanctioned in the town will only add to the use of cars. Although it has basic infrastructure, the doctors' surgery and schools are over-stretched with no apparent prospect of expansion in the foreseeable future. It makes no sense to the local community for councillors to be considering allocating additional site for housing estates in the town when there are already two large committed sites which have yet to be progressed in any meaningful way.

Full text:

Reepham might look pretty on a postcard but the reality is that it is poorly-served by public transport and remote from employment centres. Any future developments sanctioned in the town will only add to the use of cars. Although it has basic infrastructure, the doctors' surgery and schools are over-stretched with no apparent prospect of expansion in the foreseeable future. It makes no sense to the local community for councillors to be considering allocating additional site for housing estates in the town when there are already two large committed sites which have yet to be progressed in any meaningful way.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14465

Received: 19/03/2018

Respondent: Reepham Town Council

Representation:

The Town Council would find development of this site unacceptable because of the lack of a safe pedestrian access to and from the site. Given the location of the site it is unlikely that a safe pedestrian route from the site to the town centre could be created.

Full text:

The Town Council would find development of this site unacceptable because of the lack of a safe pedestrian access to and from the site. Given the location of the site it is unlikely that a safe pedestrian route from the site to the town centre could be created.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15143

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Norman Smith

Representation:

Development on this site would be visually incompatible with the nearby conservation area. Vehicular and pedestrian access would be difficult in relation to Norwich and Moor roads

Full text:

Development on this site would be visually incompatible with the nearby conservation area. Vehicular and pedestrian access would be difficult in relation to Norwich and Moor roads