GNLP0577

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14897

Received: 20/03/2018

Respondent: Dr JEREMY CORFE

Representation Summary:

This plot is not currently part of the village development and should not be considered. It would be right up next to the school which could have safeguarding implications. It would also have a significant impact on the nature and appearance of the village.

Full text:

This plot is not currently part of the village development and should not be considered. It would be right up next to the school which could have safeguarding implications. It would also have a significant impact on the nature and appearance of the village.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15272

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Colin Mower

Representation Summary:

I support small well thought out developments (4-5 houses) but I do not think the infrastructure (roads, school, amenities, lack of pavements) can support larger developments. We cannot allow the countryside to keep getting eroded and I certainly don't want to see Wicklewood become an amalgamation of Wymondham. I know this is no where near a Wymondham conurbation, but looking well into the future I can see this happening if we let go of fields gradually over time.

Full text:

Whilst I'm not a NIMBY and I recognise the need for additional housing, I do think that this development and the other large ones (GNLP0232, GNLP0535) in Wicklewood would be detrimental to the village for the following reasons:

1. The roads are already choked during peak times (especially school drop off/pick up). No pavements except on Hackford Road and partly on Church Lane mean it is already dangerous for pedestrians. People drive far too quickly and an increase in traffic will undoubtedly increase the accident risk.

2. The Primary school is already over-subscribed. Wymondham College over the last few years has hardly even extended catchment to Wicklewood due to popularity, and Wymondham High is also over-subscribed.

3. There are no village amenities apart from the pub. Pubic transport is poor (one bus an hour that takes nearly an hour to get into Norwich).

4. The surrounding fields around the village are all part of the attraction to live there. I appreciate this proposal isn't the entire field but it will immediately hit you as you enter the village. The school will be surrounded by road and housing instead of facing onto fields and feeling far more open.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15890

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Mr John Tipper

Representation Summary:

Same as my other comments, School full, no shops, no Doctors travel for everything. In this particular instance we seem to be leaping out of the Village centre and expanding beyond the natural boundary, there are fields to the north. Are we to become an urban offshoot of Wymondham?

Full text:

Same as my other comments, School full, no shops, no Doctors travel for everything. In this particular instance we seem to be leaping out of the Village centre and expanding beyond the natural boundary, there are fields to the north. Are we to become an urban offshoot of Wymondham?

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 16080

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Mrs Nicole Andrews

Representation Summary:

This is not suitable for the village due to insufficient services, the roads are not safe for extra traffic, no paths for pedestrians off the main road and all of this effects the lives of residents of this lovely village for the gain of a developer.

Full text:

This is not suitable for the village due to insufficient services, the roads are not safe for extra traffic, no paths for pedestrians off the main road and all of this effects the lives of residents of this lovely village for the gain of a developer.