GNLP0498
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 12939
Received: 07/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Darren Watling
I support this site there is no impact on the village traffic easy access the main road
I support this site there is no impact on the village traffic easy access the main road
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13004
Received: 12/02/2018
Respondent: Pam Reekie
It makes senses to develop this land if there is going to be any development in Dickleburgh
It makes senses to develop this land if there is going to be any development in Dickleburgh
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13006
Received: 12/02/2018
Respondent: Mrs Sandra Rope
This would be an ideal site to develop. Reason, all traffic would exit on to Ipswich Road then left to the roundabout on the A140 . This wouldn't cause any problems for the village centre which is already very heavily conjested.
This would be an ideal site to develop. Reason, all traffic would exit on to Ipswich Road then left to the roundabout on the A140 . This wouldn't cause any problems for the village centre which is already very heavily conjested.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13010
Received: 12/02/2018
Respondent: Mrs Sandra Rope
Another good site for development. Easy access to the bypass A140 . Again shouldn't cause any problems for
Village centre.
Another good site for development. Easy access to the bypass A140 . Again shouldn't cause any problems for
Village centre.
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13044
Received: 13/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Terence Blacker
Agent: Mr Terence Blacker
I favour a site off the Ipswich Road - GNLP0361 ans GNLP0498 - for development. If neither of those is acceptable, I would support this site.
I favour a site off the Ipswich Road - GNLP0361 ans GNLP0498 - for development. If neither of those is acceptable, I would support this site.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13124
Received: 20/02/2018
Respondent: Rev John Adlam
Outside the village envelope to develop
Outside the village envelope to develop
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13253
Received: 23/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Alan Connelly
The second of the 2 best sites in the village along with GNLP0350. very good access to good road The Street and access to A140. keeps major traffic away from the very narrow potion of the Streetby the church.
The second of the 2 best sites in the village along with GNLP0350. very good access to good road The Street and access to A140. keeps major traffic away from the very narrow potion of the Streetby the church.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13279
Received: 24/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Ivan Sanford
This is one of four sites that improves the village and has the safest traffic routes to the A140 trunk road. This site would limit pressures on Rectory Road and Harvey Lane due to school drop off/pick up trips. Any property's built on this site must have enough parking for the number of bedrooms in the property and roads must be wide enough for two vans to pass. Each site should include play areas in the planning applications and if necessary an on site parking area with a direct access to the Ipswich Road
This is one of four sites that improves the village and has the safest traffic routes to the A140 trunk road. This site would limit pressures on Rectory Road and Harvey Lane due to school drop off/pick up trips. Any property's built on this site must have enough parking for the number of bedrooms in the property and roads must be wide enough for two vans to pass. Each site should include play areas in the planning applications and if necessary an on site parking area with a direct access to the Ipswich Road
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13303
Received: 25/02/2018
Respondent: Karen Barker
If there has to be development in the village this would be a preferred site due to its access to the A140. Less of an impact on the village centre and rectory road which is already too busy with cars and lorries.
If there has to be development in the village this would be a preferred site due to its access to the A140. Less of an impact on the village centre and rectory road which is already too busy with cars and lorries.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13343
Received: 27/02/2018
Respondent: MR Allan Eavis
If housing development is can't be provided elsewhere I favour a site off the Ipswitch Road-GNLP0361 and GNLP0498 for development
If housing development is can't be provided elsewhere I favour a site off the Ipswitch Road-GNLP0361 and GNLP0498 for development
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13362
Received: 28/02/2018
Respondent: Ms Christina Percy
I agree with the proposals set forth by the Dickleburgh and Rushal Parish council.
I agree with the Parish council that housing to the south of the village would cause the least disruption in terms of traffic through the village as cars would go down to the roundabout instead of the street. The junction to the A140 to the north of the village is very busy at peak times and so I, living towards the north end, go through the village to the roundabout to save time and it is safer. I would expect that other drivers from the proposed sites to the north of the village would do the same thus increasing traffic and strain on the roads and make it less safe for children walking to school.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13367
Received: 28/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Michael Holden
I would support this development because it has the least impact on the village centre and has safe and easy access to the the main A140. This is a sensible proposal.
I would support this development because it has the least impact on the village centre and has safe and easy access to the the main A140. This is a sensible proposal.
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13383
Received: 28/02/2018
Respondent: Mrs Lusie Ambler
If it is necessary to further develop the village, this site seems a sensible option as it permits easy access to the A140 during the construction phase and subsequently for new residents, whilst allowing pedestrian access to village amenities.
If it is necessary to further develop the village, this site seems a sensible option as it permits easy access to the A140 during the construction phase and subsequently for new residents, whilst allowing pedestrian access to village amenities.
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13421
Received: 01/03/2018
Respondent: Mr John Ambler
This site offers easy access to the A140 without the need to go through the village. Pedestrian access to the village is already facilitated by the presence of a footway on the western side, though a second new footway on the eastern side should be provided to avoid pedestrians having to cross this busy road. There would also be less impact on the village during the building phase, than would be the case for some of the other proposed sites.
This site offers easy access to the A140 without the need to go through the village. Pedestrian access to the village is already facilitated by the presence of a footway on the western side, though a second new footway on the eastern side should be provided to avoid pedestrians having to cross this busy road. There would also be less impact on the village during the building phase, than would be the case for some of the other proposed sites.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13607
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Kenneth Deighton
I fully support this site as it is located with a safe direct access to the A140 as opposed to the dangerous northern junction and it would have pedestrian access to the village centre. If a new school was built on site GNLP 0350, it would meet the requirements of many parents moving in to Dickleburgh as well as providing parking for parents living elsewhere as opposed to the present situation. It eliminates the road congestion which would be guaranteed by development of any the sites located to the east and north of the village.
I fully support this site as it is located with a safe direct access to the A140 as opposed to the dangerous northern junction and it would have pedestrian access to the village centre. If a new school was built on site GNLP 0350, it would meet the requirements of many parents moving in to Dickleburgh as well as providing parking for parents living elsewhere as opposed to the present situation. It eliminates the road congestion which would be guaranteed by development of any the sites located to the east and north of the village.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13835
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Zena Tinsley
This is a significant area with an unspecified number of dwellings which makes it difficult to comment constructively. The site has the advantage of being south of the main village with good access south to the A140 but I would not wish to support a huge development, which could compromise both the character and infrastructure of the village.
This is a significant area with an unspecified number of dwellings which makes it difficult to comment constructively. The site has the advantage of being south of the main village with good access south to the A140 but I would not wish to support a huge development, which could compromise both the character and infrastructure of the village.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14073
Received: 15/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Anne Acres
The site is to big and allows for development which could be disproportional to the size of our village.
The site is to big and allows for development which could be disproportional to the size of our village.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14364
Received: 18/03/2018
Respondent: Cathy Lamb
this site gives easy access to the A140. It could provide mixed housing and amenities for the village and should not majorly increase the volume of traffic through the village. It would be good if the number of houses were specified.
this site gives easy access to the A140. It could provide mixed housing and amenities for the village and should not majorly increase the volume of traffic through the village. It would be good if the number of houses were specified.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14584
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Julia Deighton
I fully support this site as it is located with safe direct access to the A140, avoiding causing congestion in other parts of Dickleburgh, and it would have pedestrian access to the centre of the village. If a new school was built on site GNLP0350 it would attract many parents who are moving in as well as providing parking for parents living elsewhere as opposed to the present situation. There is no risk of flooding.
I fully support this site as it is located with safe direct access to the A140, avoiding causing congestion in other parts of Dickleburgh, and it would have pedestrian access to the centre of the village. If a new school was built on site GNLP0350 it would attract many parents who are moving in as well as providing parking for parents living elsewhere as opposed to the present situation. There is no risk of flooding.
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14632
Received: 19/03/2018
Respondent: Dickleburgh and Rushall Parish Council
Agent: Dickleburgh and Rushall Parish Council
The Parish Council believes that sites GNLP0361 and GNLP0350 will provide adequate housing for the village over this period.
Should there be some problem with those sites, we would support this application on the ground that it does not worsen the traffic infrastructure of the village.
The Parish Council believes that sites GNLP0361 and GNLP0350 will provide adequate housing for the village over this period.
Should there be some problem with those sites, we would support this application on the ground that it does not worsen the traffic infrastructure of the village.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 14950
Received: 20/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Oliver Selvester
Proposed sites GNLP0350 and GNLP0498 are ideal areas for the future development of Dickleburgh. They provide easy access to the A140 and the village centre without the need for road modification. Being situated on the edge of the village would reduce the traffic burden through the centre, whilst still being within walking distance of local amenities. It has been stated previously that Dickleburgh should not become a ribbon development, however, aesthetics should not be put before road safety, pollution, and common sense with regards to existing infrastructure.
Proposed sites GNLP0350 and GNLP0498 are ideal areas for the future development of Dickleburgh. They provide easy access to the A140 and the village centre without the need for road modification. Being situated on the edge of the village would reduce the traffic burden through the centre, whilst still being within walking distance of local amenities. It has been stated previously that Dickleburgh should not become a ribbon development, however, aesthetics should not be put before road safety, pollution, and common sense with regards to existing infrastructure.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15311
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mr David Leyserman
I can see some merits in this proposal. These would be many of the same points I made under GNLP0350. My objection is the sheer open ended scale of what is being proposed. This would potentially be a development completely out of proportion and, I suspect, style with the village and would harm the character and place strain on the infrastructure.
I can see some merits in this proposal. These would be many of the same points I made under GNLP0350. My objection is the sheer open ended scale of what is being proposed. This would potentially be a development completely out of proportion and, I suspect, style with the village and would harm the character and place strain on the infrastructure.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15509
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Samantha Johnson
This is a huge site - far too big to provide housing on a scale which could be supported by or appropriate for Dickleburgh.
This is a huge site - far too big to provide housing on a scale which could be supported by or appropriate for Dickleburgh.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15919
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Georgina Beaujeux
My concern is the unspecified number of dwellings, however apart from that I would say it is one of the better choices.
My concern is the unspecified number of dwellings, however apart from that I would say it is one of the better choices.
Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16016
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Angie Jones
This site in common with most applications, says unspecified amounts (dwellings) which leads to the impression of complete over- innundation within the village. What is needed is the relevant amount of AFFORDABLE housing for those who have entitlement, not an uncontrolled land-grab that benefits a few people, who then disappear, leaving the community blighted, trying to cope with what is left. This area is home to important amphibian wildlife , which will probably be destroyed.
This site in common with most applications, says unspecified amounts (dwellings) which leads to the impression of complete over- innundation within the village. What is needed is the relevant amount of AFFORDABLE housing for those who have entitlement, not an uncontrolled land-grab that benefits a few people, who then disappear, leaving the community blighted, trying to cope with what is left. This area is home to important amphibian wildlife , which will probably be destroyed.
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16064
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mr A Goodman
An area of this size (and all other areas in and around the village) have the potential to significantly distort the village. There must be identifiable, long term, sustainable employment opportunities in order to cater for the increased population and maintain a harmonious community and not add to green house gases.
An area of this size (and all other areas in and around the village) have the potential to significantly distort the village. There must be identifiable, long term, sustainable employment opportunities in order to cater for the increased population and maintain a harmonious community and not add to green house gases.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16134
Received: 26/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Barry Wright
GNLP0350
GNLP0498
GNLP0498
These three sites are only viable places for any new housing (in Dickleburgh)
Traffic from this area would not need to go through the village to get to the main A140.
Any other sites would cause havoc with traffic plus sewer problems and flooding.
GNLP0350
GNLP0498
GNLP0498
These three sites are only viable places for any new housing (in Dickleburgh)
Traffic from this area would not need to go through the village to get to the main A140.
Any other sites would cause havoc with traffic plus sewer problems and flooding.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16338
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Sonia Passfield
There is a clear and obvious choice for sites to be developed in Dickleburgh which the parish council and villagers have supported, these being GNLP0350, GNLP0361 and GNLP0498, which all offer safe and easy access to the village and the A140 with minimal disruption. Sites GNLP0063 and GNLP0389 along Harvey Lane and Rectory Road are not wanted - they are inappropriate and unsafe and would cause chaos and distress, being disastrous for the village. There would be a significant impact on safety of walkers, cyclists, horse riders and disabled people using these narrow lanes as a recreational resource.
The choice of sites in Dickleburgh must surely be clearly obvious! The villagers are saying yes, homes need to be built, but where it is safe and appropriate to do so. The parish council and villagers have clearly indicated these sites. GNLP0350, GNLP0361 and GNLP0498 all offer safe and easy access for pedestrians to the village, clear and easy access to the main A140 with little disruption during building works. It cannot be more obvious!
With regards to utterly inappropriate sites, such as the site on Harvey Lane being developed as we speak, it is causing chaos and distress on a huge level. Sites
GNLP0063 and GNLP0389 would be a disaster for the village. These single track roads are used by a huge number of people as recreational areas for walking, cycling, horse riding and a circular route round the village. There are children, dogs, disabled people on these narrow lanes all the time. It's only a matter of time before the unthinkable would happen.
Harvey Lane, Rectory Road - no-one wants it. These sites are not safe, not wanted and certainly not appropriate. I sincerely hope sense prevails on these matters!
Comment
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16352
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Philip and Susan Sykes
Number of people: 2
Concerns that water supply is already a problem for those living in existing housing and this will be exacerbated by the introduction of new housing on site GNLP0361. Traffic safety, inconsiderate parking and poor visibility at Chapel Road/Ipswich Road junction are also issues of concern. Housing nearer A140 roundabout (GNLP0498) is preferable. General view that homes should be built nearer to work/jobs to recognise the escalating cost of transport and excessive commuting from e.g. Norwich to Ipswich. More housing would put pressure on medical services and schools. Ongoing issue with blocked foul sewers needs to be addressed by Anglian Water.
We wish to bring to the notice of the Council and Development authority that water supply is already a problem for those of us living in older houses that do not have cold water tanks at roof level. (GNLP0361)
More housing off Chapel Road will only cause more problems with water supply.
Secondly, traffic. Vehicles joining The Street/Ipswich Road at this cross road from Chapel Road - have to come well onto the street before one can see if anyone is coming down the street.
It is the same for those coming from the school onto the street as there are vehicles as often as not, parked on the street right up to the junction, preventing a view of oncoming traffic.
Inconsiderate parking is also causing problems for HGV drivers at this crossroad. So - do we really need more housing down Langmere Road.
Personally I think housing nearer the A140 roundabout (GNLP0498) would be better for Dickleburgh than elsewhere. However, why not put housing where the jobs/work is? Transport is likely to become ever more expensive, so why not plan for that? The last few days (3-3-18) is a good example of where we should put housing close to where the jobs are.
It is ridiculous - for example a teacher living in Norwich going to work daily in Ipswich because they cannot afford to move home!
More housing in our villages puts more pressure on our overworked medical services - schools etc. These should be put in place before more housing is built.
Lastly, sewage. Over the last 40 years we have had several blocked pipes due to an insufficient fall in the pipes below the street, sometimes caused by "wipes" being disposed of down the toilet - will Anglian Water sort this out before more housing is placed down this part of Dickleburgh?
Thank you.
Support
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 16648
Received: 22/03/2018
Respondent: Mrs Judith Jenkins
The traffic situation in Dickleburgh is a problem due to heavy lorries (Smurfit kappa depot) and narrow roads (Harvey lane ,The street) and this situation would be exacerbated by development to the north of the village. I support small development to the south of the village that doesn't impinge on the wildlife site, Dickleburgh moor, or overload the villages infrastructure. I feel that sites GNLP0361 and GNLP0498 would meet these requirements.
The traffic situation in Dickleburgh is a problem due to heavy lorries (Smurfit kappa depot) and narrow roads (Harvey lane ,The street) and this situation would be exacerbated by development to the north of the village. I support small development to the south of the village that doesn't impinge on the wildlife site, Dickleburgh moor, or overload the villages infrastructure. I feel that sites GNLP0361 and GNLP0498 would meet these requirements.