GNLP0462

Showing comments and forms 1 to 15 of 15

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13082

Received: 18/02/2018

Respondent: Mrs Jane Fox

Representation:

This area is the 'lung of the village' paddock area. Planning was applied for and rejected in this area recently for many reasons, all of which still stand! It was rejected by the village council and then again at appeal. I can hardly believe the persistance of the agent! There was and still is a strong group of objectors who worked hard at the time to lay bare the facts of the site and the positive impact ecologically and environmentally that it has on the immediate area and wider village population. Should not be considered at all for housing.

Full text:

This area is the 'lung of the village' paddock area. Planning was applied for and rejected in this area recently for many reasons, all of which still stand! It was rejected by the village council and then again at appeal. I can hardly believe the persistance of the agent! There was and still is a strong group of objectors who worked hard at the time to lay bare the facts of the site and the positive impact ecologically and environmentally that it has on the immediate area and wider village population. Should not be considered at all for housing.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13084

Received: 18/02/2018

Respondent: Dr Ketan Dhatariya

Representation:

See the previous decision by the planning inspectorate on rejecting the previous proposal - nothing has changed - https://acp.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/ViewCase.aspx?caseid=3034084

Full text:

I live next door to this historic piece of ancient land. Over the almost 5 years we have lived here we have had two previous developers make representation to build on this land, and both times the entire village has strongly objected and the proposals to build were roundly and soundly rejected by HM planning inspectorate (for the last one, please see decision made on 1/12/15 - APP/L2630/W/15/3034084 for application 2014/2429/F - it is available to review at https://acp.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/ViewCase.aspx?caseid=3034084). We hope that the council looks at this decision and rejects the current proposal as well. Nothing has changed, and our objections remain the same

Comment

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13089

Received: 19/02/2018

Respondent: Mr James Utting

Representation:

OBJECT STRONGLY

A recent appeal has determined that any development of this paddock will severely affect the visual amenity it provides. It is zoned 'public open space' and the benefits it brings by remaining undeveloped have been recognised and acknowledged for over 35 years. It is more important than ever that it remains undeveloped.

Full text:

OBJECT STRONGLY

A recent appeal has determined that any development of this paddock will severely affect the visual amenity it provides. It is zoned 'public open space' and the benefits it brings by remaining undeveloped have been recognised and acknowledged for over 35 years. It is more important than ever that it remains undeveloped.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13176

Received: 20/02/2018

Respondent: Mr T Larkowsky

Representation:

A previous decision by the planning inspectorate, rejecting previous proposals . When will the 'developers realise this site is not available

Full text:

A previous decision by the planning inspectorate, rejecting previous proposals . When will the 'developers realise this site is not available

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13234

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Mr James Tullett

Representation:

There are already enough houses being built in Hethersett. This site was turned down 2 years ago. Circumstances have not changed therefore this proposal should be rejected again. The village needs protected space for the wildlife and to maintain protected open space for the future.

Full text:

There are already enough houses being built in Hethersett. This site was turned down 2 years ago. Circumstances have not changed therefore this proposal should be rejected again. The village needs protected space for the wildlife and to maintain protected open space for the future.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13237

Received: 22/02/2018

Respondent: Dr Sarah Gough

Representation:

Planning permission was only recently refused for this area, even after appeal. All the objections raised then still stand. Hethersett is already massively expanding with the current new development. Please leave the one remaining wild green area alone.

Full text:

Planning permission was only recently refused for this area, even after appeal. All the objections raised then still stand. Hethersett is already massively expanding with the current new development. Please leave the one remaining wild green area alone.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15455

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mrs Marianne Young

Representation:

I strongly object to this land being considered for development. This land was subject to planning application 2014/2429 which went to appeal and was dismissed on the grounds set out in the attached document:
https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/files/33BB6BC398C31E143769AFB4A814E1A5/pdf/2014_2429-APPEAL_DISMISSED-1385306.pdf
The reasons stated on this document still stand, this land should not be considered for any further planning applications. The site is designated as Important Local Open Space and should stay that way.

Full text:

I strongly object to this land being considered for development. This land was subject to planning application 2014/2429 which went to appeal and was dismissed on the grounds set out in the attached document:
https://info.south-norfolk.gov.uk/online-applications/files/33BB6BC398C31E143769AFB4A814E1A5/pdf/2014_2429-APPEAL_DISMISSED-1385306.pdf
The reasons stated on this document still stand, this land should not be considered for any further planning applications. The site is designated as Important Local Open Space and should stay that way.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15456

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: James Young

Representation:

I strongly object to this site being considered for development.
The previous planning application (South Norfolk Council reference number 2014/2429) was rejected and the subsequent appeal with The Planning Inspectorate (Appeal Ref: APP/L2630/W/15/3034084)was dismissed.
The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space, as identified in Policy DM 4.4 in the DM Policies Document (2015)and the development would involve the loss of a significant proportion of the ILOS, and
would materially harm its open character and appearance.

Full text:

I strongly object to this site being considered for development.
The previous planning application (South Norfolk Council reference number 2014/2429) was rejected and the subsequent appeal with The Planning Inspectorate (Appeal Ref: APP/L2630/W/15/3034084)was dismissed.
The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space, as identified in Policy DM 4.4 in the DM Policies Document (2015)and the development would involve the loss of a significant proportion of the ILOS, and
would materially harm its open character and appearance.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15463

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Edward Delatte

Representation:

I strongly object to this land being considered for development. It was subject to planning in 2014, went to appeal and was dismissed. The site is designated Important Local Open Space and should be left as it is.

Full text:

I strongly object to this land being considered for development. It was subject to planning in 2014, went to appeal and was dismissed. The site is designated Important Local Open Space and should be left as it is.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15478

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mes Marie Rushbrook

Representation:

I would like to register my objection to this area being put forward for consideration for development. This land has been designated as Important Local Open Space recently and the importance of this remains relevant.

Full text:

I would like to register my objection to this area being put forward for consideration for development. This land has been designated as Important Local Open Space recently and the importance of this remains relevant.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15491

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Dr Simon Rushbrook

Representation:

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to submit my objection to this area being considered for development due to its significance as an Important Local Space.

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to submit my objection to this area being considered for development due to its significance as an Important Local Space.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15585

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Bond

Representation:

1/ Findings of Planning Inspector who refused appeal for development of this site arising from last planning application for this site are still entirely valid.
2/ Maintaining open space within centre of village is very important given the current & ongoing development of 1,000+ homes to North of existing village. Scale of this new additional development should not allow further development within village centre, increased density will adversely affect natural environment traffic, safety,noise, pollution, air quality etc.

Full text:

1/ Findings of Planning Inspector who refused appeal for development of this site arising from last planning application for this site are still entirely valid.
2/ Maintaining open space within centre of village is very important given the current & ongoing development of 1,000+ homes to North of existing village. Scale of this new additional development should not allow further development within village centre, increased density will adversely affect natural environment traffic, safety,noise, pollution, air quality etc.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15816

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: MRS Nicola Haste

Representation:

I strongly object to this site being considered for development.

The previous planning application (South Norfolk Council reference number 2014/2429) was rejected and the subsequent appeal with The Planning Inspectorate (Appeal Ref: APP/L2630/W/15/3034084)was dismissed.

This would change to lovely look and character of the are the main reason we all chose Hethersett to live.

The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space, as identified in Policy DM 4.4 in the DM Policies Document (2015)and the development would involve the loss of a significant proportion of the ILOS, and
would materially harm its open character and appearance.

Full text:

I strongly object to this site being considered for development.

The previous planning application (South Norfolk Council reference number 2014/2429) was rejected and the subsequent appeal with The Planning Inspectorate (Appeal Ref: APP/L2630/W/15/3034084)was dismissed.

This would change to lovely look and character of the are the main reason we all chose Hethersett to live.

The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space, as identified in Policy DM 4.4 in the DM Policies Document (2015)and the development would involve the loss of a significant proportion of the ILOS, and
would materially harm its open character and appearance.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15826

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: MRS Nicola Haste

Representation:

This should not be allowed.

Full text:

I strongly object to this site being considered for development.
The previous planning application (South Norfolk Council reference number 2014/2429) was rejected and the subsequent appeal with The Planning Inspectorate (Appeal Ref: APP/L2630/W/15/3034084)was dismissed.
The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space, as identified in Policy DM 4.4 in the DM Policies Document (2015)and the development would involve the loss of a significant proportion of the ILOS, and
would materially harm its open character and appearance

It would be totally wrong to build on this land its would change the traffic volume and visual look for all the houses in the area.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15972

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Mr John Hamey

Representation:

The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space. A recent planning application was rejected and the appeal was dismissed; circumstances have not changed since. If it is to be sustainable, the current rapid development of Hethersett makes the preservation of open space and the creation of corridors and refuges for wildlife even more important.

Full text:

The site is designated as an Important Local Open Space, as identified in Policy DM 4.4 in the DM Policies Document (2015) and its development would involve the loss of a significant proportion of the ILOS. In addition it would materially harm the open character and appearance of the remainder.

A recent planning application (South Norfolk Council reference number 2014/2429) was rejected and the appeal APP/L2630/W/15/3034084 was dismissed.

There has been no change of circumstance since these determinations.

In addition to be sustainable the rapid development of Hethersett calls for the preservation of open space and the creation in consultation with neighbouring planning authorities of corridors and refuges for wildlife. Gardens aside, this will be part of the only significant open space remaining in Hethersett on completion of the developments for which planning permission has already been granted; it is significant that the new developments make no provision for extensive open spaces of this kind.