GNLP0104

Showing comments and forms 1 to 11 of 11

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 12871

Received: 30/01/2018

Respondent: Mr Alan Franks

Representation Summary:

The access to the site via Sandstone Way is unsuitable for more than one property to be built.

Also any development on this site would would suffer from an unacceptably high level of noise and vibration due to its very close proximity to the A1066. (This is my qualified opinion as a retired acoustician and member of the Institute of Acoustics)

Full text:

The access to the site via Sandstone Way is unsuitable for more than one property to be built.

Also any development on this site would would suffer from an unacceptably high level of noise and vibration due to its very close proximity to the A1066. (This is my qualified opinion as a retired acoustician and member of the Institute of Acoustics)

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 12875

Received: 31/01/2018

Respondent: Mrs Kirsty Laifa

Representation Summary:

This area is already under some planning much to the distaste of local residents in what is a pretty part of our village and is already objected to. Not in keeping with the roads around it and already densely populated. No room for more as accesses out onto already busy road into Diss. Needs no more development here and the residents around here are unhappy already with proposals. What thought for the present community here has been taken NONE . Leave this area alone for the sake of the residenets there already, let them have their say?

Full text:

This area is already under some planning much to the distaste of local residents in what is a pretty part of our village and is already objected to. Not in keeping with the roads around it and already densely populated. No room for more as accesses out onto already busy road into Diss. Needs no more development here and the residents around here are unhappy already with proposals. What thought for the present community here has been taken NONE . Leave this area alone for the sake of the residenets there already, let them have their say?

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 12879

Received: 31/01/2018

Respondent: Mr Alan Franks

Representation Summary:

About two thirds of the site is outside of the development envelope. This section contains a Bronze age ring ditch and other aftifacts have been found dating back to 2,500BC.
Details of this important historical site are shown on the Roydon Parish walkes brochure.
The site is bordered to the south by The Angles way which has to be crossed to enter the site.

Full text:

About two thirds of the site is outside of the development envelope. This section contains a Bronze age ring ditch and other aftifacts have been found dating back to 2,500BC.
Details of this important historical site are shown on the Roydon Parish walkes brochure.
The site is bordered to the south by The Angles way which has to be crossed to enter the site.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 12968

Received: 20/02/2018

Respondent: Dr G M Courtier

Representation Summary:

No suitable vehicular access to this site seems possible, even for a single dwelling.

Full text:

No suitable vehicular access to this site seems possible, even for a single dwelling.

Comment

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13618

Received: 07/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Mark Emsden

Representation Summary:

I object to this. It is very close to a main road and would cause congestion. The local infrastructure is struggling to cope as it is, with a lack of spaces at Doctors, Dentists and Schools, any further developments would make it much worse. IT IS NOT A SUITABLE LOCATION IN A VILLAGE

Full text:

I object to this. It is very close to a main road and would cause congestion. The local infrastructure is struggling to cope as it is, with a lack of spaces at Doctors, Dentists and Schools, any further developments would make it much worse. IT IS NOT A SUITABLE LOCATION IN A VILLAGE

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13634

Received: 07/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Mark Emsden

Representation Summary:

I object to this. It is very close to a main road and would cause
congestion. The local infrastructure is struggling to cope as it is, with
a lack of spaces at Doctors, Dentists and Schools, any further developments
would make it much worse. IT IS NOT A SUITABLE LOCATION IN A VILLAGE

Full text:

I object to this. It is very close to a main road and would cause
congestion. The local infrastructure is struggling to cope as it is, with
a lack of spaces at Doctors, Dentists and Schools, any further developments
would make it much worse. IT IS NOT A SUITABLE LOCATION IN A VILLAGE

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 13668

Received: 08/03/2018

Respondent: Roydon Parish Council

Representation Summary:

This area contains remains of Bronze Age settlement and a Roman villa. There are concerns that traffic volumes and ongoing road maintenance issues on the A1066 caused by the volume of traffic would be exacerbated by further homes on this site.

Full text:

This area contains remains of Bronze Age settlement and a Roman villa. There are concerns that traffic volumes and ongoing road maintenance issues on the A1066 caused by the volume of traffic would be exacerbated by further homes on this site.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14164

Received: 16/03/2018

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Shorter

Representation Summary:

Object. Too near A1066 and an archaelogical dig was undertaken on this site and may be of historical interest.

Full text:

Object. Too near A1066 and an archaelogical dig was undertaken on this site and may be of historical interest.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15044

Received: 21/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Paul Curson

Representation Summary:

This land has archaeological remains of an Iron Age enclosure. Since this is the only confirmed arcahaeological site of interest in Roydon, it would be a great pity to destroy it. The land is also low lying on the river flood plain and may be subject to more regular flooding in future, as will surrounding extant properties.

Full text:

This land has archaeological remains of an Iron Age enclosure. Since this is the only confirmed arcahaeological site of interest in Roydon, it would be a great pity to destroy it. The land is also low lying on the river flood plain and may be subject to more regular flooding in future, as will surrounding extant properties.

Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 15691

Received: 22/03/2018

Respondent: Suffolk Wildlife Trust

Representation Summary:

This site is within approximately 300m of Roydon Fen, which is a Suffolk Wildlife Trust reserve and is designated as a Local Nature Reserve and a County Wildlife Site. Development of site GNLP0104 has the potential to result in a range of adverse impacts on the fen, including through increased recreational pressure. Such impacts must be assessed before any decision can be made on the allocation of any development sites. Development which would result in harm to sites designated for their nature conservation importance should not be allocated.

Full text:

This site is within approximately 300m of Roydon Fen, which is a Suffolk Wildlife Trust reserve and is designated as a Local Nature Reserve and a County Wildlife Site. Development of site GNLP0104 has the potential to result in a range of adverse impacts on the fen, including through increased recreational pressure. Such impacts must be assessed before any decision can be made on the allocation of any development sites. Development which would result in harm to sites designated for their nature conservation importance should not be allocated.

Support

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 16165

Received: 06/04/2018

Respondent: Nr Eric Taylor

Representation Summary:

Plots GNLP0104 and GNLP1038 are very small plots and would not contribute many homes. However, both sites could be suitable for self-build homes.

Full text:

I feel it is important that those working on the GNLP work closely with those working on the Neighbourhood plan to ensure that local wishes form the basis of decisions made,

Whilst I am not directly involved the Neighbourhood plan I am a key member of the local resident's association and feel the views I express below are the views of a lot of people living in Diss.

The plans you produced show mainly the ''call for sites'' and little else. Certainly not the infrastructure to support the sites. Clearly there are more sites than are needed for the projected number of new homes. It is therefore important that any agreed sites are clearly identified as I think it would be completely wrong to allocate more land than is required leaving it for the developer to cherry pick which site to apply to build on. The general feeling amongst residents is that future developments should generally be to the north of Diss. I have commented below on your plans:

Sites for new homes.
* Of the sites offered GNLP0606, GNLP0119, GNLP0291, GNLP0362, GNLP0342 and GNLP0250 are the most suitable as they border a road which could be upgraded to become a Northern Relief Road. However, a portion of this land would be needed to expand the Cemetery which has not been taken into account.
* Plot GNLP1044 is in fact two plots with a road through the middle - Walcot Green. They should be designated as two separate plots. The eastern part could be considered for housing together with plot GNLP1003 providing Walcot Green was upgraded from a single-track road to a more suitable twin track road. Currently because of congestion on Victoria Road, Walcot Green is used as a preferred route into town by many residents
* The western half of plot GNLP1044 and GNLP0599 should be retained as green space. Both these sites would be vigorously opposed by residents. In fact, this is one of the few areas of open 'green field' land left in DIss
* Plot GNLP0102 is in the middle of the Diss Strategic Employment site and should be designated for business development only.
* Plot GNLP1045 is the last green space in an area surrounded by housing and should be retained as a green area.
* Plot GNLP0112 is a very small green area containing a few trees and shrubs and should not be built on. In addition, because of its close proximity to the railway bridge access would be poor and undoubtedly dangerous.
* Plot GNLP0341 is where a town centre car park and the health centre are located. Whilst I agree the health centre needs relocating this area should be retained as a green space and car park close to the town centre
* Plot GNLP0526 is in my opinion suitable for development.
* Plots GNLP0104 and GNLP1038 are very small plots and would not contribute many homes. However, both sites could be suitable for self-build homes.

Town Infrastructure

* Land to the west of Morrisons and to the south of Victoria Road should be designated for Health and Leisure. The land behind the Thatcher's Needle should be allocated for a new modern health Centre and possibly a centralised Dental centre. It is in an ideal location as it is very central, close to the bus station and has more than adequate parking.
* Land adjacent to the Thatcher's Needle where the Feather Factory is presently located should be considered as a location for a new leisure centre
* Traffic congestion is a major problem in Diss adversely affecting residents and business alike. Whilst we have a few minor improvements (tweaks) at the planning stage which will help a little we desperately need a Northern Relief Road (or bypass) and an upgrade to Walcot Green to allow Diss to continue to grow and prosper.

I appreciate this is probably a bit more detailed than you need at this stage but the GNLP and the Diss and District Neighbourhood plan are going to dictate how we grow and prosper over the next 15 years.