GNLP2076

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18556

Received: 11/12/2018

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Robert and Cynthia Forster

Representation Summary:

With the submission of GNLP2076 for 5 business outlets again we would like to recommend this as it has good access through Home Farm access road and would add to the current units operating from that site.

Therefore, we feel that GNLP2078 and GNLP2076 would add to the villages as opposed to GNLP0492 which with the poor access onto post office road and a five road junction has already drawn criticism from highways stating that the layout would need to be changed before any development could be considered.

Full text:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the consultation document. As residents of the village of Frettenham we wish to draw your attention to the proposals GNLP0492, GNLP2078 and GNLP2076 in your consultation document.

With the submission of GNLP2078 addition to the small site proposals listed for 25 dwellings located on the southern edge of the parish boundary at Buxton Road we would like to recommend this for any future development of the village as it has excellent road access to the Buxton road which links Buxton to Spixworth which are both service villages and has good visibility to north and south from the proposed entrance.

Therefore, we feel that GNLP2078 and GNLP2076 would add to the villages as opposed to GNLP0492 which with the poor access onto post office road and a five road junction has already drawn criticism from highways stating that the layout would need to be changed before any development could be considered. We also like to draw your attention to the comments below.

This site has been considered by broadland District Council and the planning inspectorate between 2008 and 2010. Final decision reference APP/K2620/A/10/2133334 recommended that this site was not suitable for housing development. This situation in the village as listed on the above document has not changed.
We recommend that site GNLP0492 is not suitable for consideration in the Greater Norwich Local Plan.

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 19359

Received: 13/12/2018

Respondent: Keith Robertson

Representation Summary:

With the submission of GNLP2076 for 5 business outlets again we would like to recommend this as it has good access through Home Farm access road and would add to the current units operating from that site.

Therefore, we feel that GNLP2078 and GNLP2076 would add to the village as opposed to GNLP0492 which with the poor access onto Post Office Road and five-road junction has already drawn criticism from Highways stating that the layout would need to be changed before any development could be considered.

Full text:

I support my neighbours comments:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the consultation listed above. As residents of the village of Frettenham we wish to draw your attention to the proposals GNLP0492, GNLP2078 and GNLP2076 in your consultation document.
With the submission of GNLP 2078 addition to the small site proposals list for 25 dwellings located on the southern edge of the Parish boundary at 10 Buxton Road we would like to recommend this for any future development of the village as it has excellent road access to the Buxton Road which links Buxton to Spixworth which are both service villages and has good visibility to north and south from the proposed entrance.
With the submission of GNLP2076 for 5 business outlets again we would like to recommend this as it has good access through Home Farm access road and would add to the current units operating from that site.
Therefore, we feel that GNLP2078 and GNLP2076 would add to the village as opposed to GNLP0492 which with the poor access onto Post Office Road and a five-road junction has already drawn criticism from Highways stating that the layout would need to be changed before any development could be considered. We also like to draw your attention to the comments below.
This site has been considered before by Broadland District Council and the Planning Inspectorate between 2008 and 2010. The final decision reference APP/K2610/A/10/2133334 recommended that this site was not suitable for housing development. The situation in the village as listed on the above document bas not changed
We recommend that site GNLP0492 is not suitable for consideration in your Greater Norwich Local Plan.

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 19522

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: R and S Bulley

Representation Summary:

The submission of GNLP2076 for 5 business outlets - this again would have good access and would compliment the units already in situ.

Full text:

We welcome the opportunity to comment on the above.
As residents of Frettenham we refer to proposals GNLP0492, GNLP2078 and GNLP2076.

The submission of GNLP2078 for 25 dwellings at 10 Buxton Road - this would be a positive future development of the village as it has excellent access to the Buxton Road and has good visibility in both directions from the proposed entrance.

The submission of GNLP2076 for 5 business outlets - this again would have good access and would compliment the units already in situ.

The submission of GNLP0492 - this proposal has extremely poor access onto Post Office Road and a five road junction and has previously drawn criticism from Highways that the road layout would need to be changed before any development could be considered.
This site(GNLP0492) has previously been considered by Broadland District Council and the Planning Inspectorate between 2008 and 2010. The final decision, reference APP/K2610/A/10/2133334, recommended that this site was not suitable for housing development. The situation, as listed on the aforementioned document, remains unchanged. This would surely indicate that this site is not suitable for consideration in your Greater Norwich Local Plan.

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 19571

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Mr Kian Saedi

Representation Summary:

On behalf of Mr Matthew Hewitt, please find attached an indicative layout masterplan incorporating site submissions GNLP2078 and GNLP2076.

The sites remain available for development and can be developed in accordance with the indicative layout - we hope to submit a planning application in the new year.

Full text:

On behalf of Mr Matthew Hewitt, please find attached an indicative layout masterplan incorporating site submissions GNLP2078 and GNLP2076.

The sites remain available for development and can be developed in accordance with the indicative layout

Attachments:

  • Map (123.32 KB)
  • Map (6.41 MB)

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 19688

Received: 17/12/2018

Respondent: Mr and Mrs K Gowing

Representation Summary:

GNLP2078and GNLP2076. The submission for 25 dwellings at buxton road these have excellent access and good visibility in both directions from the proposed entrance .

The submission of GNLP0492 this has extremely poor access onto post office road and five road junction which the highways turned down as an health and safety issue.This decision was turned down and the planning inspectors recommend that this site was not suitable for housing development reference no app/k2610/A/10/2133334. The situation as listed on the aforementioned document remains unchanged this would surely indicate that this site is not suitable for consideration in your greater Norwich local plan.

Full text:

We welcome the opportunity to comment on the above as a resident of frettenham we refer to the proposal GNLP0492. GNLP2078 and GNLP2076. The submission for 25 dwellings at buxton road these have excellent access and good visibility in both directions from the proposed entrance .

The submission of GNLP0492 this has extremely poor access onto post office road and five road junction which the highways turned down as an health and safety issue.This decision was turned down and the planning inspectors recommend that this site was not suitable for housing development reference no app/k2610/A/10/2133334. The situation as listed on the aforementioned document remains unchanged this would surely indicate that this site is not suitable for consideration in your greater Norwich local plan.