GNLP2052

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 40

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17050

Received: 14/11/2018

Respondent: South Norfolk Council

Representation:

Both sites on surface water flood flow path affecting approx. 50% of northern site and approx. 85% of southern site.
Northern site - depths between 300-900mm for high (up to 1 in 30yr)medium (between 1 in 30 & 1 in 100yr) and low (between 1 in 100 & 1 in 1000yr)risk events. the whole of the frontage of the site affected by all events.
Southern site - depths generally below 300mm for high and medium risk events and between 300mm & 900mm for low risk events

Full text:

Both sites on surface water flood flow path affecting approx. 50% of northern site and approx. 85% of southern site.
Northern site - depths between 300-900mm for high (up to 1 in 30yr)medium (between 1 in 30 & 1 in 100yr) and low (between 1 in 100 & 1 in 1000yr)risk events. the whole of the frontage of the site affected by all events.
Southern site - depths generally below 300mm for high and medium risk events and between 300mm & 900mm for low risk events

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17084

Received: 15/11/2018

Respondent: mrs hazel dormer

Representation:

Residents drive 2.7 km for schools. shops and pub or 5.5km to Kenninghall doctors, schools, shops and pubs. Public transport is 2.7km away.It's low lying, flooding in heavy rainfall across the road. The adjacent small sewage works is low lying and at full capacity. Anglia water empties it on a regular basis. There are sewage drainage issues for properties closest to it. Road safety for pedestrians; children, elderly and disabled is risky.Speed watch and speed indicators are used and heavy agricultural machinery and large lorries access the A1066 from the airfield industrial sites, chicken units, farms and contracting businesses.

Full text:

Residents drive 2.7 km for schools. shops and pub or 5.5km to Kenninghall doctors, schools, shops and pubs. Public transport is 2.7km away.It's low lying, flooding in heavy rainfall across the road. The adjacent small sewage works is low lying and at full capacity. Anglia water empties it on a regular basis. There are sewage drainage issues for properties closest to it. Road safety for pedestrians; children, elderly and disabled is risky.Speed watch and speed indicators are used and heavy agricultural machinery and large lorries access the A1066 from the airfield industrial sites, chicken units, farms and contracting businesses.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17087

Received: 15/11/2018

Respondent: mr karl traynier

Representation:

Highway adjoining is completely unsuitable. Residents and parish council concerned about danger to pedestrians for some years. Mobile speed cameras and speedwatch scheme operate adjacent to sites. Road narrow heavy vehicles often reverse to pass.
Sites have no access to required services and are greenfield. Road liable to flooding. Sewage pumping station smells when emptied by tankers every month.
There would be negative impact on the environment due to loss of greenfield and reliance on cars due to no public transport or services nearby

Full text:

Highway adjoining is completely unsuitable. Residents and parish council concerned about danger to pedestrians for some years. Mobile speed cameras and speedwatch scheme operate adjacent to sites. Road narrow heavy vehicles often reverse to pass.
Sites have no access to required services and are greenfield. Road liable to flooding. Sewage pumping station smells when emptied by tankers every month.
There would be negative impact on the environment due to loss of greenfield and reliance on cars due to no public transport or services nearby

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17089

Received: 15/11/2018

Respondent: ms anna nicolopolu

Representation:

I am registered disabled and am a wheelchair user. Closest shop with level access is Kenninghall 5.7km away. There are no footpaths in Fersfield, road is unsafe for pedestrians. Nearest bus service is Bressingham. The Street often has large areas of surface water that have to be navigated round by pedestrians.
The plan states sites should be close to services and have as little environmental impact as possible. These sites would have the opposite effect, they would destroy greenfield areas and mean private car use would be unnecessarily increased due to their rural location.

Full text:

I am registered disabled and am a wheelchair user. Closest shop with level access is Kenninghall 5.7km away. There are no footpaths in Fersfield, road is unsafe for pedestrians. Nearest bus service is Bressingham. The Street often has large areas of surface water that have to be navigated round by pedestrians.
The plan states sites should be close to services and have as little environmental impact as possible. These sites would have the opposite effect, they would destroy greenfield areas and mean private car use would be unnecessarily increased due to their rural location.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17091

Received: 15/11/2018

Respondent: mr daniel richardson

Representation:

Application contrary to almost all relevant criteria. 2.7km from shop, bus stop, village hall, pub, and maintained playing field with football pitch and tennis court.
Dangerous road, numerous complaints to parish council about speeding by heavy vehicles accessing airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. In places road is not wide enough for lorries to pass. Pedestrians forced to jump onto verges, clearly not acceptable for elderly, disabled or pushchairs.
Land low lying and road floods. Sewage station in between two sites emits very unpleasant smells when regularly emptied by tankers.
Both greenfield sites in remote locations

Full text:

Application contrary to almost all relevant criteria. 2.7km from shop, bus stop, village hall, pub, and maintained playing field with football pitch and tennis court.
Dangerous road, numerous complaints to parish council about speeding by heavy vehicles accessing airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. In places road is not wide enough for lorries to pass. Pedestrians forced to jump onto verges, clearly not acceptable for elderly, disabled or pushchairs.
Land low lying and road floods. Sewage station in between two sites emits very unpleasant smells when regularly emptied by tankers.
Both greenfield sites in remote locations

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17128

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: mrs grace leeper

Representation:

There is no need to build on these fields, There are other sites closer to schools, shops and bus services. The only way to get out of Fersfield is by car. Building would make the road even more dangerous than it already is. It is not safe to walk on the road due to the heavy lorries using the grain store on the airfield and the chicken and mushroom farms.

Full text:

There is no need to build on these fields, There are other sites closer to schools, shops and bus services. The only way to get out of Fersfield is by car. Building would make the road even more dangerous than it already is. It is not safe to walk on the road due to the heavy lorries using the grain store on the airfield and the chicken and mushroom farms.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17132

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: Mr Mark Wickenden

Representation:

With a lack of utilities in this area with an already over exhausted sewage pumping station these sites also fall within a known flooding area with streams often over flowing
This Road is majorly congested by HGVs and agricultural machinery. There is no capacity for pavements in this area and the road is in poor condition causing road safety issues for children, the disabled & elderly.
The nearest school is 2 miles away and not suitable to walk, the local shop & doctors is over 3 miles away in Kenninghall
A concern for employee loss from the agricultural industry

Full text:

With a lack of utilities in this area with an already over exhausted sewage pumping station these sites also fall within a known flooding area with streams often over flowing
This Road is majorly congested by HGVs and agricultural machinery. There is no capacity for pavements in this area and the road is in poor condition causing road safety issues for children, the disabled & elderly.
The nearest school is 2 miles away and not suitable to walk, the local shop & doctors is over 3 miles away in Kenninghall
A concern for employee loss from the agricultural industry

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17134

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Wickenden

Representation:

Blocked road drains cause major flooding between the 2 sites. Highways are often notified but no action has ever been taken
The area is on overhead phone and electric power.
The Anglian Water pumping next to GNLP2052 is almost to capacity.
Speeding agricultural vehicles are already a danger to the local residence and HGVs create further congestion.
The Street is an old airfield road and would not be able to sustain more traffic.
Lack of amenities to support additional housing including Doctors, shops & public transport.
Open space loss & Greenbelt loss when other brown field sites have been identified

Full text:

Blocked road drains cause major flooding between the 2 sites. Highways are often notified but no action has ever been taken
The area is on overhead phone and electric power.
The Anglian Water pumping next to GNLP2052 is almost to capacity.
Speeding agricultural vehicles are already a danger to the local residence and HGVs create further congestion.
The Street is an old airfield road and would not be able to sustain more traffic.
Lack of amenities to support additional housing including Doctors, shops & public transport.
Open space loss & Greenbelt loss when other brown field sites have been identified

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17159

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: ms sally pankhurst

Representation:

This greenfield development would have a negative impact on the environment and increase peoples reliance on cars. This is against all environmental policies.
The adjacent road is prone to flooding and dangerous for pedestrians. The Street is used as the main route by lorries accessing the airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. On some stretches such as near the church it is impossible for pedestrians to get off the highway due to the high banks.

Full text:

This greenfield development would have a negative impact on the environment and increase peoples reliance on cars. This is against all environmental policies.
The adjacent road is prone to flooding and dangerous for pedestrians. The Street is used as the main route by lorries accessing the airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. On some stretches such as near the church it is impossible for pedestrians to get off the highway due to the high banks.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17163

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: mr adam pankhurst

Representation:

This greenfield development would have a negative impact on the surrounding environment and increase air pollution It would also increase peoples reliance on cars to get to essential amenities. There is a lack of these amenities in Fersfield. The closest shop, bus stop, school, pub and village hall are at Bressingham.
The Street is prone to flooding in this area and is difficult to walk easily for pedestrians, elderly, disabled and cyclists. It's used as the main route by heavy transport accessing the airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. It is impractical and unsuitable site for development

Full text:

This greenfield development would have a negative impact on the surrounding environment and increase air pollution It would also increase peoples reliance on cars to get to essential amenities. There is a lack of these amenities in Fersfield. The closest shop, bus stop, school, pub and village hall are at Bressingham.
The Street is prone to flooding in this area and is difficult to walk easily for pedestrians, elderly, disabled and cyclists. It's used as the main route by heavy transport accessing the airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. It is impractical and unsuitable site for development

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17165

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: mrs elaine attwood

Representation:

Concern about road safety for dog walkers with extra heavy traffic.
Loss of greenbelt.
Lack of amenities.

Full text:

Concern about road safety for dog walkers with extra heavy traffic.
Loss of greenbelt.
Lack of amenities.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17168

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: mrs sue cattermole

Representation:

Concern about road safety for dog walkers with extra heavy traffic.
Loss of greenbelt and environment issues.
Lack of amenities near to development.

Full text:

Concern about road safety for dog walkers with extra heavy traffic.
Loss of greenbelt and environment issues.
Lack of amenities near to development.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17170

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: mrs suzanne fenn

Representation:

Road safety is an issue for pedestrians; children, elderly, disabled, dog walkers and cyclists. Heavy vehicles are already a safety issue.
Loss of greenbelt and environment issues of increased pollution and flooding across a low geographical site..
Lack of amenities like school, doctors, shops near to development.
Increased use of cars.

Full text:

Road safety is an issue for pedestrians; children, elderly, disabled, dog walkers and cyclists. Heavy vehicles are already a safety issue.
Loss of greenbelt and environment issues of increased pollution and flooding across a low geographical site..
Lack of amenities like school, doctors, shops near to development.
Increased use of cars.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17172

Received: 18/11/2018

Respondent: mr aubrey fenn

Representation:

Applications contrary to almost all relevant criteria.
Dangerous road, numerous complaints to parish council about speeding by heavy vehicles accessing airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms.
Land is low lying and road floods. Sewage station next door is low lying and emptied regularly due to overflow.
This greenfield site is in a remote location away from key amenities such as schools, shops, surgeries, football pitch and pubs.

Full text:

Applications contrary to almost all relevant criteria.
Dangerous road, numerous complaints to parish council about speeding by heavy vehicles accessing airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms.
Land is low lying and road floods. Sewage station next door is low lying and emptied regularly due to overflow.
This greenfield site is in a remote location away from key amenities such as schools, shops, surgeries, football pitch and pubs.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17186

Received: 19/11/2018

Respondent: mrs sheena hubbard

Representation:

Applications contrary to almost all relevant criteria.
Road safety an issue, low lying road which floods, sewage works at full capacity, greenfield site in remote location away from key amenities

Full text:

Applications contrary to almost all relevant criteria.
Road safety an issue, low lying road which floods, sewage works at full capacity, greenfield site in remote location away from key amenities

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17263

Received: 21/11/2018

Respondent: ms Tonya Manning

Representation:

This greenfield development would have a negative impact. Air pollution will increase with reliance on cars to get to essential amenities - against all environmental policies.
The Street floods from surface water and sewage works. Road safety is poor with speed cameras next to the sites and is dangerous for pedestrians. The Street is used as the main route to the A1066 by lorries from the airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. On some stretches such as near the church it is impossible for pedestrians to get off the highway due to the high banks and visibility.

Full text:

This greenfield development would have a negative impact. Air pollution will increase with reliance on cars to get to essential amenities - against all environmental policies.
The Street floods from surface water and sewage works. Road safety is poor with speed cameras next to the sites and is dangerous for pedestrians. The Street is used as the main route to the A1066 by lorries from the airfield grain store, industrial site and local chicken farms. On some stretches such as near the church it is impossible for pedestrians to get off the highway due to the high banks and visibility.

Comment

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17267

Received: 21/11/2018

Respondent: ms anna goodwin

Representation:

This proposal goes against many environmental policies. Travel to schools, shops, doctors and community is by car with no available public transport. No facilties for children. so journeys to Diss or Bressingham playing field.
Regular road flooding preventing pedestrians using road with no pavement. Heavy vehicles daily use of road - lorries, tractors and trailers. Small sewage works struggles to cope and is at full capacity.
Road safety urgent issue for families, disabled and elderly. Not safe!

Full text:

This proposal goes against many environmental policies. Travel to schools, shops, doctors and community is by car with no available public transport. No facilties for children. so journeys to Diss or Bressingham playing field.
Regular road flooding preventing pedestrians using road with no pavement. Heavy vehicles daily use of road - lorries, tractors and trailers. Small sewage works struggles to cope and is at full capacity.
Road safety urgent issue for families, disabled and elderly. Not safe!

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17268

Received: 21/11/2018

Respondent: ms anna goodwin

Representation:

This proposal goes against many environmental policies. Travel to schools, shops, doctors and community is by car with no available public transport. No facilties for children. so journeys to Diss or Bressingham playing field.
Regular road flooding preventing pedestrians using road with no pavement. Heavy vehicles daily use of road - lorries, tractors and trailers. Small sewage works struggles to cope and is at full capacity.
Road safety urgent issue for families, disabled and elderly. Not safe!

Full text:

This proposal goes against many environmental policies. Travel to schools, shops, doctors and community is by car with no available public transport. No facilties for children. so journeys to Diss or Bressingham playing field.
Regular road flooding preventing pedestrians using road with no pavement. Heavy vehicles daily use of road - lorries, tractors and trailers. Small sewage works struggles to cope and is at full capacity.
Road safety urgent issue for families, disabled and elderly. Not safe!

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17270

Received: 21/11/2018

Respondent: mr Tim Doggett

Representation:

This site has always flooded and is difficult to pass with heavy agricultural and industrial vehicles using it daily.
It's low lying and next to a sewage works that is at full capacity and pumped out by Anglia Water monthly.
To get to the shops, pubs or schools cars need to be used and there are no buses, Cycling can be dangerous with so many large vehicles speeding through.
This is the wrong site in the wrong location. Doesn't fit with environmental criteria.

Full text:

This site has always flooded and is difficult to pass with heavy agricultural and industrial vehicles using it daily.
It's low lying and next to a sewage works that is at full capacity and pumped out by Anglia Water monthly.
To get to the shops, pubs or schools cars need to be used and there are no buses, Cycling can be dangerous with so many large vehicles speeding through.
This is the wrong site in the wrong location. Doesn't fit with environmental criteria.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17273

Received: 21/11/2018

Respondent: ms Tonya Manning

Representation:

1.Problem with drainage from surrounding lands.
2.No Mains drainage.
3.Busy road already.

Full text:

How could these three plots of land even be considered for development????
Drainage on the stretch of road that GNLP2052 and 2053 is proposed on floods when we have huge downpours (and that's when the ditches are kept clear!) what would happen when the developers finish and theres no one tending them?
There is no reliable facility for sewage, no mains drainage. The villagers rely on either septic tanks or a small sewage plant, that gets emptied by lorry.
The Street in Fersfield is a very busy road, with large farm machinery and lorries using it continuously throughout the day. This can make dog walking, riding, cycling and driving quiet dangerous at times.
Fersfield is a small village, and should remain a small village. Once these pieces of land are gone, they're gone for good. So sad.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17374

Received: 24/11/2018

Respondent: Dr Amanda Mcmurray

Representation:

There is no public transport serving the locality and the housing proposed is unlikely to make services economically viable. Therefore, each new home will require 1-2 vehicles = up to 80 additional vehicles. Assuming 10 homes, that each vehicle travels 20 miles/day on 5 days/week and an average, modern, medium sized car emits 250g CO2/mile (carfueldata.dft.gov.uk) the site proposed here will lead directly to increasing CO2 emissions by 26.5tonnes/year, with no obvious benefiut argument to mitigate the increase.

Full text:

There is no public transport serving the locality and the housing proposed is unlikely to make services economically viable. Therefore, each new home will require 1-2 vehicles = up to 80 additional vehicles. Assuming 10 homes, that each vehicle travels 20 miles/day on 5 days/week and an average, modern, medium sized car emits 250g CO2/mile (carfueldata.dft.gov.uk) the site proposed here will lead directly to increasing CO2 emissions by 26.5tonnes/year, with no obvious benefiut argument to mitigate the increase.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17524

Received: 30/11/2018

Respondent: Mr Shaun Collins

Representation:

Due to the existing infrastructure in the area including the current lack of amenities within a 3 mile radius of Bressingham expanding the village further will put more strain on the village, the schools and shop are already undersized.The roads in the area would need to be greatly improved as in many sections it is tight for cars to pass. The services in the region are weak at best with half the village on septic tanks etc. Bressingham is a village with a good rural heritage and by building further housing developments this will ensure the village loses this

Full text:

Due to the existing infrastructure in the area including the current lack of amenities within a 3 mile radius of Bressingham expanding the village further will put more strain on the village, the schools and shop are already undersized.The roads in the area would need to be greatly improved as in many sections it is tight for cars to pass. The services in the region are weak at best with half the village on septic tanks etc. Bressingham is a village with a good rural heritage and by building further housing developments this will ensure the village loses this

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17609

Received: 02/12/2018

Respondent: Mr Paul Sumpter

Representation:

Leaving aside the regular flooding of road, no pavements, no street lighting, poor roads, inadequate sewage treatment, no public amenities and overstretched roads this development would ruin the community spirit which exists in this village.

Full text:

Leaving aside the regular flooding of road, no pavements, no street lighting, poor roads, inadequate sewage treatment, no public amenities and overstretched roads this development would ruin the community spirit which exists in this village.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17725

Received: 20/11/2018

Respondent: Mr Ronald Leeper

Representation:

I object to building on these fields. I live near these sites and use a mobility scooter. The road is too dangerous for me to go out onto and more traffic would make it worse. There is no bus service in fersfield and there are no pavements. I am 80 years old, I was born in the house I live in, the road always had had a lot of surface water when it rains. Lorries drive over my garden pass. See photographs attached. There is no need to build on fields so far away from schools and shops.

Full text:

I object to building on these fields. I live near these sites and use a mobility scooter. The road is too dangerous for me to go out onto and more traffic would make it worse. There is no bus service in fersfield and there are no pavements. I am 80 years old, I was born in the house I live in, the road always had had a lot of surface water when it rains. Lorries drive over my garden pass. See photographs attached. There is no need to build on fields so far away from schools and shops.

Attachments:

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17731

Received: 21/11/2018

Respondent: Mr Paul Sumpter

Representation:

There are no pavements adjoining any of the sites - raising safety issues
* There is no street lighting - again safety issues
* There are no mains sewers which would mean more septic/treatment tanks emptying into ditches giving rise to environmental issues.
* Two of the designated areas completely surround one property which is likely to significantly alter the value of that property and its enjoyment by the present owners.
* There is already significant traffic (short cut from A!! to A1066, agricultural vehicles, haulage vehicles servicing warehouses and intensive livestock units) going through the village with very little control over speeds.
* Connectivity is very poor in the area both for phones and for wifi
* With regard to the School Lane site, while access to the A1066 would be easy significant improvements to the road system would need to be considered as already at peak times it is both chaotic and dangerous.
* Finally, any development on the sites mentioned would seriously detract from the rural nature of the village and consequently of it peaceful enjoyment by villagers.

Full text:

With regard to the sites that i wished to comment on, the sites concerned are all in the Bressingham and Fersfield vicinity and are numbered GNLP Sites 2052, 2053, 2054 and 2056.
I believe theses sites are inappropriate and the concerns that i had tried to express were as follows:
* There are no pavements adjoining any of the sites - raising safety issues
* There is no street lighting - again safety issues
* There are no mains sewers which would mean more septic/treatment tanks emptying into ditches (although i am not sure if this is the case with site mentioned on School lane, Bressingham). - This will almost certainly give rise to environmental issues.
* Two of the designated areas completely surround one property which is likely to significantly alter the value of that property and its enjoyment by the present owners.
* There is already significant traffic (short cut from A!! to A1066, agricultural vehicles, haulage vehicles servicing warehouses and intensive livestock units) going through the village with very little control over speeds, "Quiet lane' designation is largely ignored. To add further to the traffic volume would only exacerbate an already unsatisfactory situation.
* Connectivity is very poor in the area both for phones and for wifi
* Specifically with regard to the School Lane site, while access to the A1066 would be easy significant improvements to the road system would need to be considered as already at School dropping off and collecting times it is both chaotic and dangerous.
* Finally, any development on the sites mentioned would seriously detract from the rural nature of the village and consequently of it peaceful enjoyment by villagers. I believe that this would significantly change the nature of the village with the result that established members of our community would seriously consider moving elsewhere.

For the sake of impartiality/clarity i confirm that none of the proposed sites are adjacent to my own property and as such i would not be directly affected by such a development, however my neighbours and our broader village community would be and it is for this reason that i wish to lodge the above representations for your consideration before the next step in the process is taken.

I have one minor amendment to make as on closer inspection it has been pointed out to me that one of the site proposals does in fact back onto a small part of my property.
My objections and representations remain the same.

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17752

Received: 04/12/2018

Respondent: Mrs Jess Bowman

Representation:

Fersfield is a small village, it can not realistically take a huge 250 house, estate! I do believe however that we need affordable housing. I also think that we need to look at land with in villages to build on. Homes are needed nation wide. This site would work well. It is central to the village and is only a small set of paddocks, right next to a recreational meadow.

Full text:

Fersfield is a small village, it can not realistically take a huge 250 house, estate! I do believe however that we need affordable housing. I also think that we need to look at land with in villages to build on. Homes are needed nation wide. This site would work well. It is central to the village and is only a small set of paddocks, right next to a recreational meadow.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17804

Received: 05/12/2018

Respondent: miss patricia willis

Representation:

Bressingham has poor roads, that will be unable to cope with this level of increased traffic.The school cannot cope with more cars in the morning and afternoon.High road is very difficult to walk along as there is a lack of pavements.It is already very difficult to get a doctor's appointment in Diss.There is very little public transport and even this may not continue after April.
Why take fertile agricultural land that we may need in the future for a lot of houses the village cannot cope with.Bressingham is a nice quiet village why ruin it.The environment will be ruined.

Full text:

Bressingham has poor roads, that will be unable to cope with this level of increased traffic.The school cannot cope with more cars in the morning and afternoon.High road is very difficult to walk along as there is a lack of pavements.It is already very difficult to get a doctor's appointment in Diss.There is very little public transport and even this may not continue after April.
Why take fertile agricultural land that we may need in the future for a lot of houses the village cannot cope with.Bressingham is a nice quiet village why ruin it.The environment will be ruined.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17869

Received: 06/12/2018

Respondent: Ms Kim Burr

Representation:

The proposed site is totally unsuitable for development as it is in a High Risk area for surface water flooding. Any sort of housing will only increase surface water run off and further compound this. The road which the site abuts already floods. Furthermore, there is no infrastructure or amenities in the area. No buses or pavements and a road that is used daily by HGV's would mean an increase in pollution due to extra vehicles. Sewage treatment is also an issue here.
Fersfield is a lovely small community and this should not be compromised.

Full text:

The proposed site is totally unsuitable for development as it is in a High Risk area for surface water flooding. Any sort of housing will only increase surface water run off and further compound this. The road which the site abuts already floods. Furthermore, there is no infrastructure or amenities in the area. No buses or pavements and a road that is used daily by HGV's would mean an increase in pollution due to extra vehicles. Sewage treatment is also an issue here.
Fersfield is a lovely small community and this should not be compromised.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 17872

Received: 06/12/2018

Respondent: Mr Christopher Lawrence

Representation:

The obvious lack of amenities, sewage and drainage issues, dangerous narrow road and isolated location, means this site would be totally inappropriate for any sort of development.

Full text:

The obvious lack of amenities, sewage and drainage issues, dangerous narrow road and isolated location, means this site would be totally inappropriate for any sort of development.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18085

Received: 08/12/2018

Respondent: Bressingham and Fersfield Parish Council

Representation:

GNLP 2052
We understand that this site is actually to the west of The Street. We fully endorse your 5.11 Statement recognising the site as unsuitable.

Full text:

GNLP 2052
We understand that this site is actually to the west of The Street. We fully endorse your 5.11 Statement recognising the site as unsuitable.