GNLP2053

Showing comments and forms 31 to 37 of 37

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18159

Received: 09/12/2018

Respondent: Ms Debbie Gosman

Representation Summary:

One of my daughters is disabled and feels trapped at home because the road is so unsafe for her. We are all regular cyclists, cycling into Diss to catch trains on a regular basis. My other daughter cant drive, it is the only way she can get there independently. it is really important the main road is safe and not full of speeding traffic who block the road, the width of the road is not wide enough for traffic to pass. It is also essential that services which are in Bressingham - shop, village hall and school are easily accessible.

Full text:

One of my daughters is disabled and feels trapped at home because the road is so unsafe for her. We are all regular cyclists, cycling into Diss to catch trains on a regular basis. My other daughter cant drive, it is the only way she can get there independently. it is really important the main road is safe and not full of speeding traffic who block the road, the width of the road is not wide enough for traffic to pass. It is also essential that services which are in Bressingham - shop, village hall and school are easily accessible.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18161

Received: 09/12/2018

Respondent: Mr Nick Gosman

Representation Summary:

I strongly object to these development proposals. I regularly cycle to the train station in Diss and have had several near misses caused by speeding traffic using the narrow lanes. Agricultural vehicles and HGV's make use of the verges to pass each other and are ruining many of the verges in the village.
The proposals would increase traffic and air pollution due to the remote location.

Full text:

I strongly object to these development proposals. I regularly cycle to the train station in Diss and have had several near misses caused by speeding traffic using the narrow lanes. Agricultural vehicles and HGV's make use of the verges to pass each other and are ruining many of the verges in the village.
The proposals would increase traffic and air pollution due to the remote location.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18163

Received: 09/12/2018

Respondent: Ms Sophie Gosman

Representation Summary:

These are greenfield sites served by poor roads that already have serious issues for pedestrians and cyclists. They do not comply with the requirements for sustainability due to distance from services. There would be a negative and un reversible impact on the environment.

Full text:

These are greenfield sites served by poor roads that already have serious issues for pedestrians and cyclists. They do not comply with the requirements for sustainability due to distance from services. There would be a negative and un reversible impact on the environment.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18225

Received: 10/12/2018

Respondent: Mrs. Christine Crawley

Representation Summary:

An obvious lack of amenities, sewage and drainage issues make these sites unsuitable for proposed development. There are no pavements and the roads are already dangerous, especially for pedestrians. Increased number of cars and therefore pollution will create more issues for residents .

Full text:

An obvious lack of amenities, sewage and drainage issues make these sites unsuitable for proposed development. There are no pavements and the roads are already dangerous, especially for pedestrians. Increased number of cars and therefore pollution will create more issues for residents .

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 18320

Received: 06/12/2018

Respondent: MRS KAY BROCK

Representation Summary:

We are writing to object to the proposed housing development in Bressingham. This land has been used for growing crops on so why now houses? The roads in this area are struggling to cope and the amenities (doctors, dentists and schools) are also stretched to breaking point. The environmental and ecological harm is out of proportion with size the village will become if this goes through and the aged population will find the increased traffic exceptionally hard to cope with. We know we have to move forward but this scheme is like trying to pour a litre into a pint pot.

Full text:

We are writing to object to the proposed housing development in Bressingham. This land has been used for growing crops on so why now houses? The roads in this area are struggling to cope and the amenities (doctors, dentists and schools) are also stretched to breaking point. The environmental and ecological harm is out of proportion with size the village will become if this goes through and the aged population will find the increased traffic exceptionally hard to cope with. We know we have to move forward but this scheme is like trying to pour a litre into a pint pot.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 19187

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: mrs mandy Thomson

Representation Summary:

This site floods and the road is often under water from higher fields with little drainage. Poor road conditions with heavy agricultural and industrial vehicles. Speeding traffic with no passing places and no pavement for pedestrians. This development would materially change the social structure of the village

Full text:

This site floods and the road is often under water from higher fields with little drainage. Poor road conditions with heavy agricultural and industrial vehicles. Speeding traffic with no passing places and no pavement for pedestrians. This development would materially change the social structure of the village

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

Representation ID: 19656

Received: 17/12/2018

Respondent: G Harvey

Representation Summary:

I write to point out the sites proposed for development in Bressingham are inappropriate for the following reasons
1 Common Road/ High Road -too large for the village.
2 Memorial cross road -this would increase congestion near to the school.
3 School Road -this would be further linear development..
4 A 1066 -dangerous entrance and exit on to a fast major road.

Full text:

I write to point out the sites proposed for development in Bressingham are inappropriate for the following reasons
1 Common Road/ High Road -too large for the village.
2 Memorial cross road -this would increase congestion near to the school.
3 School Road -this would be further linear development..
4 A 1066 -dangerous entrance and exit on to a fast major road.