GNLP0191R
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17392
Received: 25/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Henry Peters Corbett
This development will increase traffic though the village which is not equipped to handed it, making it more dangerous for residents and children as well as distort our communities dog walking rout. This development will destroy our view over the beautiful open countryside which is a large part of why we live here.
This development will significantly increase traffic in the area, in witch people (non-residents) already travel though our village at well over the 30mph speed limit and with a double-blinde bend in the center of the village it will be a far more dangerous area in which to walk, drive and live. This is of paramount importance as our village in now home to a number of toddlers and small children and as the parent I cannot see how this development and the traffic that it will bring with it will do anything but make our village a more dangerous place in which to live. This is only one facet of the issue as a large number of our residents (my self included) will lose our best dog walk and be force to find a new place to exercise our pets.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17402
Received: 26/11/2018
Respondent: Prof. David Peters Corbett
20 houses means between 30 and 40 extra vehicles passing through an already overloaded main road through the village. Church Road contains a double blind bend opposite the Church, which has become actively dangerous over the last 10 years as traffic between the A140 and Mulbarton has increased. The road cannot cope with increased traffic without remodelling on a major scale and the resulting loss of the character of Sawinsthorpe as a residential village.
20 houses means between 30 and 40 extra vehicles passing through an already overloaded main road through the village. Church Road contains a double blind bend opposite the Church, which has become actively dangerous over the last 10 years as traffic between the A140 and Mulbarton has increased. The road cannot cope with increased traffic without remodelling on a major scale and the resulting loss of the character of Sawinsthorpe as a residential village.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17429
Received: 26/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Henry Mills
This is green beautiful agricultural land with a wealth of wildlife. The houses will destroy countryside living. Church Road is extremely busy and has limited access and is used as a rat run to get to Mulbarton and other surrounding villages. The road is narrow in places and visibility is poor.
This is green beautiful agricultural land with a wealth of wildlife. The houses will destroy countryside living. Church Road is extremely busy and has limited access and is used as a rat run to get to Mulbarton and other surrounding villages. The road is narrow in places and visibility is poor.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17430
Received: 26/11/2018
Respondent: Miss Sacha Seaman
The greenbelts surrounding villages such as Swainsthorpe need to be protected from these greedy, ill-thought and ill planned planning applications. There are countless areas in and around Norwich where this development would fit better. The village could simply not sustain another housing population of this kind without causing chaos and danger to an already busy cut through to the A140 and neighbouring villages. This proposal is shortsighted and lacks integrity.
The greenbelts surrounding villages such as Swainsthorpe need to be protected from these greedy, ill-thought and ill planned planning applications. There are countless areas in and around Norwich where this development would fit better. The village could simply not sustain another housing population of this kind without causing chaos and danger to an already busy cut through to the A140 and neighbouring villages. This proposal is shortsighted and lacks integrity.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17431
Received: 26/11/2018
Respondent: Miss Sacha Seaman
The greenbelts surrounding villages such as Swainsthorpe need to be protected from these greedy, ill-thought and ill-planned planning applications. There are countless areas in and around Norwich where this development would fit better. The village could simply not sustain a housing population of this kind without causing chaos and danger to an already busy cut through to the A140 and neighbouring villages. This proposal is shortsighted and lacks intelligence.
The greenbelts surrounding villages such as Swainsthorpe need to be protected from these greedy, ill-thought and ill-planned planning applications. There are countless areas in and around Norwich where this development would fit better. The village could simply not sustain a housing population of this kind without causing chaos and danger to an already busy cut through to the A140 and neighbouring villages. This proposal is shortsighted and lacks intelligence.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17470
Received: 28/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Malcolm Robins
This land is not suitable for the proposed development for the following reasons:
1. Lack of local infrastructure.
2. Access to the site would be limited from Church Road.
3. Traffic flows through the village, particularly in the light of existing traffic from Mulbarton, would be impacted.
4. The construction of 20 additional homes would alter the essence of this small rural settlement.
5. The development is unnecessary and far more suitable sites, supported by better transport and local services, are available in other locations within South Norfolk.
This land is not suitable for the proposed development for the following reasons:
1. Lack of local infrastructure.
2. Access to the site would be limited from Church Road.
3. Traffic flows through the village, particularly in the light of existing traffic from Mulbarton, would be impacted.
4. The construction of 20 additional homes would alter the essence of this small rural settlement.
5. The development is unnecessary and far more suitable sites, supported by better transport and local services, are available in other locations within South Norfolk.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17496
Received: 29/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Iain Brooksby
This development proposal will put intolerable pressure on Church Rd and the junction of Church Rd / A140 /access rd to Swainsthorpe Hall, Hall Farm. This junction is already hazardous and there have been several accidents exacerbated by normal traffic as well as agricultural vehicles just crossing the A140.
There will be further pollution in the village—-mainly light, but also fumes from increased traffic and vehicles queuing on A140 in rush hour as well as traffic queuing on Church Rd.
The loss of the hard edge to the village allowing further development in this area in the future.
This development proposal will put intolerable pressure on Church Rd and the junction of Church Rd / A140 /access rd to Swainsthorpe Hall, Hall Farm. This junction is already hazardous and there have been several accidents exacerbated by normal traffic as well as agricultural vehicles just crossing the A140.
There will be further pollution in the village—-mainly light, but also fumes from increased traffic and vehicles queuing on A140 in rush hour as well as traffic queuing on Church Rd.
The loss of the hard edge to the village allowing further development in this area in the future.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17536
Received: 30/11/2018
Respondent: Mr Richard Allen
An extraordinarily inappropriate proposal by reason of situation, size and (barring wholesale destruction of the area of common land on the southern side of Church Road) inaccessibility. My comments on the proposals for 603 and 604 relating to the increased dangers at the junction of Church Road and the A140 also apply to this ludicrous proposal.
An extraordinarily inappropriate proposal by reason of situation, size and (barring wholesale destruction of the area of common land on the southern side of Church Road) inaccessibility. My comments on the proposals for 603 and 604 relating to the increased dangers at the junction of Church Road and the A140 also apply to this ludicrous proposal.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17541
Received: 30/11/2018
Respondent: Miss Katrina Crossley
Access on to Church Road would be almost impossible and unsafe, it is far too narrow and can barely cope with the volume of traffic that already uses it, the road can barely fit two cars, there is minimal street lighting, and the visibility is already poor enough, not to mention the A140 which is already very dangerous due to extremely high amounts of traffic. How can it possibly cope with more?
Please do not ruin our beautiful, agricultural land and damage our wildlife - there are not enough of these places left.
Access on to Church Road would be almost impossible and unsafe, it is far too narrow and can barely cope with the volume of traffic that already uses it, the road can barely fit two cars, there is minimal street lighting, and the visibility is already poor enough, not to mention the A140 which is already very dangerous due to extremely high amounts of traffic. How can it possibly cope with more?
Please do not ruin our beautiful, agricultural land and damage our wildlife - there are not enough of these places left.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17571
Received: 01/12/2018
Respondent: Steve Baker
The site has unsuitable access, Church Road is narrow and access would be via a current track immediately next to an existing property.
The proposed 20 dwellings would increase traffic on Church Road and produce a dangerous junction at the site access due to the narrowness of the road, there are daily queues accessing the A140 and the site would increase strain on this already busy junction.
There is a threat to the local environment access.
Development should be on 'brownfield' sites rather than using a 'greenfield' site such as this.
The village has no facilities to support extra development.
The site has unsuitable access, Church Road is narrow and access would be via a current track immediately next to an existing property.
The proposed 20 dwellings would increase traffic on Church Road and produce a dangerous junction at the site access due to the narrowness of the road, there are daily queues accessing the A140 and the site would increase strain on this already busy junction.
There is a threat to the local environment access being next to a local pond and common land.
Development should be on 'brownfield' sites rather than using a 'greenfield' site such as this.
The village has no facilities to support extra development.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17601
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Bonnie Toogood
Our village is fine thank you. No more house required. Let's keep it rural.
Our village is fine thank you. No more house required. Let's keep it rural.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17605
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: Mr Alan Rowe
Our village is too small, our road is too narrow and already too busy, and we have no amenities.
Our village is too small, our road is too narrow and already too busy, and we have no amenities.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17608
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: Ms A Wells
* lack of existing social infrastructure and facilities
* agricultural land between a high-speed rail line and high-voltage power lines is highly unsuitable for residential development.
* site is split by a farmtrack with access across common land
* addition to pollution and congestion on A140
* Exit onto Church Road is narrow with blind bends and used as a cut through by frustrated drivers.
* 20 houses are far too many for an "other village" designated for limited in-fill only in the JCS
* loss of agricultural land, and wildlife habitat
GNLP0191R
Infractructure
There are few existing local services - no school, no shop, no post office, no doctors surgery. All of these facilities are a 2 mile car journey away down narrow country lanes to Mulbarton where they are all are overstretched by the continuing development there. The limited bus service runs only during the day accessible from stops on either side of the A140. Waiting on either side is unpleasant. Crossing from the far side is a very scary experience, even in daylight hours.
There are around 160 houses in Swainsthorpe. An additional 20 is far too many for an "other village" designated for limited in-fill only as termed in the JCS and too many to absorb into a tiny local community.
The village does not have continuous pavements and the street lighting is extremely poor.
Access
Access is onto a 'C' road just a hundred yards from a level crossing, which is closed at least 4 times an hour. The only access and egress to this split site is by an agricultural single vehicle width track which joins unclassified Church Road. This is not a single site but two fields bisected by a farm track. Access would be also across common land, currently with a mini village gree and bench in the centre.
A recent speedwatch check showed many drivers speeding at 50mph through the village.
The exit is onto Church Road, a narrow road already used as a "rat run" to Mulbarton and Swardeston. This use will increase if the already congested A140 becomes even busier. Additional housing will add further to the existing problem.
Exit from Swainsthorpe village is onto the A140 one of the most heavily congested roads in the county. Access north towards Norwich or southwards is often extremely difficult entailing a long frustrating wait at the end of Church Road. The return journey requires cars to be isolated in the filter lane waiting to turn in and faced with juggernauts thundering towards the filter. It is likely that new houses would bring one or two cars each to the visit all adding to the pollution and congestion already present.
Environment
This site would be a precedent for similar developments changing the rural character of the village forever. The existing agricultural land is habitat for a wide variety of mammals, insects and birds and o build on this site would destroy acres of our farm land on the edge of the village forever. Additionally this agricultural land is between High Speed rail line and high voltage power lines and is highly unsuitable for residential development. There is some evidence that living near overhead power lines is detrimental to childhood development.
Summary
* lack of existing social infrastructure and facilities
* agricultural land between a high-speed rail line and high-voltage power lines is highly unsuitable for residential development.
* site is split by a farmtrack with access across common land
* addition to pollution and congestion on A140
* Exit onto Church Road is narrow with blind bends and used as a cut through by frustrated drivers.
* 20 houses are far too many for an "other village" designated for limited in-fill only in the JCS
* loss of agricultural land, and wildlife habitat
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17613
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: Michael Wells
* lack of existing social infrastructure and facilities - no school, shop, medical centre, post office, poor bus service, inadequate pavements and street lighting
* agricultural land between a high-speed rail line and high-voltage power lines is highly unsuitable for residential development
* additional private vehicles increase pollution and congestion in village and on A140
* exit onto narrow road with blind bends near level crossing
* 20 houses are far too many for an "other village" designated for limited in-fill only in the JCS
* loss of agricultural land and wildlife habitat
GNLP0191R
Infractructure
There are few existing local services - no school, no shop, no post office, no doctors surgery. All of these facilities are a 2 mile car journey away down narrow country lanes to Mulbarton where they are all are overstretched by the continuing development there. The limited bus service runs only during the day accessible from stops on either side of the A140. Waiting on either side is unpleasant. Crossing from the far side is a very scary experience, even in daylight hours.
There are around 160 houses in Swainsthorpe. An additional 20 is far too many for an "other village" designated for limited in-fill only as termed in the JCS and too many to absorb into a tiny local community.
The village does not have continuous pavements and the street lighting is extremely poor.
Access
Access is onto a 'C' road just a hundred yards from a level crossing, which is closed at least 4 times an hour. The only access and egress to this split site is by an agricultural single vehicle width track which joins unclassified Church Road. This is not a single site but two fields bisected by a farm track. Access would be also across common land, currently with a mini village gree and bench in the centre.
A recent speedwatch check showed many drivers speeding at 50mph through the village.
The exit is onto Church Road, a narrow road already used as a "rat run" to Mulbarton and Swardeston. This use will increase if the already congested A140 becomes even busier. Additional housing will add further to the existing problem.
Exit from Swainsthorpe village is onto the A140 one of the most heavily congested roads in the county. Access north towards Norwich or southwards is often extremely difficult entailing a long frustrating wait at the end of Church Road. The return journey requires cars to be isolated in the filter lane waiting to turn in and faced with juggernauts thundering towards the filter. It is likely that new houses would bring one or two cars each to the visit all adding to the pollution and congestion already present.
Environment
This site would be a precedent for similar developments changing the rural character of the village forever. The existing agricultural land is habitat for a wide variety of mammals, insects and birds and o build on this site would destroy acres of our farm land on the edge of the village forever. Additionally this agricultural land is between High Speed rail line and high voltage power lines and is highly unsuitable for residential development. There is some evidence that living near overhead power lines is detrimental to childhood development.
Summary
* lack of existing social infrastructure and facilities - no school, shop, medical centre, post office, poor bus service, inadequate pavements and street lighting
* agricultural land between a high-speed rail line and high-voltage power lines is highly unsuitable for residential development
* additional private vehicles increase pollution and congestion in village and on A140
* exit onto narrow road with blind bends near level crossing
* 20 houses are far too many for an "other village" designated for limited in-fill only in the JCS
* loss of agricultural land and wildlife habitat
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17618
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: Dr Alexander Heaton
This development is too large for a small rural village.
The facilities in the village are inadequate to sustain an increase in this number of dwellings.
For example:
1. the A140 is already dangerously overloaded
2.There are no local amenities inc no shop
3. Local public transport is woeful
This development is too large for a small rural village.
The facilities in the village are inadequate to sustain an increase in this number of dwellings.
For example:
1. the A140 is already dangerously overloaded
2.There are no local amenities inc no shop
3. Local public transport is woeful
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17634
Received: 02/12/2018
Respondent: MISS DAISY MILLS
1) thoughtless, reckless no consideration has been taken into account.
2) detrimental consequences to the environment. The housing estate would disrupt and spoil the village feel.
3) already many fatal accidents on the road, why do you want to increase the chances of more?
4) chruch Road is already risky for pedestrians, we don't need anymore cars.
5) more road and air pollution.
Firstly I do not understand how someone could actually think this proposal was a good idea. It is a thoughtless and reckless money making idea that will have detrimental consequences to the environment. Swainsthorpe is a beautiful, little village with lots of character and a family feel, having a housing estate would completely disrupt and spoil the village. It's not hard to see that the A140 is already a busy road, with many fatal accidents. By having a housing estate built in the tiny village adds the pressure of more cars and therefor increasing the chances of more deaths. As a child growing up in swainsthorpe, walking to the bus stop was a dangerous experience with the tight roads, poor visibility around the corners and the speeding cars. There are no close amenities for families in the area, once again adding more of a burden on the roads. If this proposal was actually planned properly and took others into consideration, any person would be able to see Swainsthorpe is just far too small for any new houses.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17680
Received: 04/12/2018
Respondent: Dr Margaret Robins
Land is not suitable for 20 new houses for the following reasons:
Access - Church Road already suffers excess traffic from Mulbarton and this would add to congestion at junction with A140;
Village character - Extension beyond existing envelope would affect the nature of this small settlement;
Lack of local infrastructure - transport and local facilities are limited;
Lack of necessity - more suitable sites exist in South Norfolk.
Land is not suitable for 20 new houses for the following reasons:
Access - Church Road already suffers excess traffic from Mulbarton and this would add to congestion at junction with A140;
Village character - Extension beyond existing envelope would affect the nature of this small settlement;
Lack of local infrastructure - transport and local facilities are limited;
Lack of necessity - more suitable sites exist in South Norfolk.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17689
Received: 03/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Tracey Williamson
I object very strongly about any future development in our lovely village of swainsthorpe.
This will course extra traffic, making it dangerous on Church Road and the A140, which is already a heavy traffic road.
There will be added noise pollution and fumes from more traffic.
Loss of our lovely countryside and dog walks.
Total disruption to the villagers while all construction works are being carried out.
I object very strongly about any future development in our lovely village of swainsthorpe.
This will course extra traffic, making it dangerous on Church Road and the A140, which is already a heavy traffic road.
There will be added noise pollution and fumes from more traffic.
Loss of our lovely countryside and dog walks.
Total disruption to the villagers while all construction works are being carried out.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17717
Received: 04/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Jeannette Rowe
There are no amenities in this village to support such a development.
The road system would also be overwhelmed.
There are no amenities in this village to support such a development.
The road system would also be overwhelmed.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17719
Received: 19/11/2018
Respondent: Mr John Craft
I am writing to oppose the above proposed site for the building of 20 houses on the following grounds :
1) Swainsthorpe is a small village with no facilities i.e. shops, post office or school.
2) It would greatly increase the size of the village.
3) Access onto Church Road would have to be on common village land with a small village green, unless it went on the other side, directly onto Church Road.
4) Church Road is used as a rat run from Mulbarton. At peak times, it is a busy and fast road. Motorists do not adhere to the 30 m.p.h. A recent speed trap recorded speeds at up to 75 m.p.h.
5) It is close to the level crossing which is closed several times every hour
6) Loss of agricultural land.
7) It would add lots of cars to the already problematic entry onto the A140.
I am writing to oppose the above proposed site for the building of 20 houses on the following grounds :
1) Swainsthorpe is a small village with no facilities i.e. shops, post office or school.
2) It would greatly increase the size of the village.
3) Access onto Church Road would have to be on common village land with a small village green, unless it went on the other side, directly onto
Church Road.
4) Church Road is used as a rat run from Mulbarton. At peak times, it is a busy and fast road. Motorists do not adhere to the 30 m.p.h. speed
limit. A recent speed trap recorded speeds at up to 75 m.p.h.
5) It is close to the level crossing which is closed several times every hour, causing a build up of traffic.
6) Loss of agricultural land.
7) It would add lots of cars to the already problematic entry onto the A140. Even during the day, traffic is constant and it is difficult to access.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17780
Received: 04/12/2018
Respondent: Mr Tony Roffe
Access to and from Swainsthorpe via the A140 is already extremely hazardous due to poor visibility in both directions, and this development would further increase the volume of traffic through the village which is already used as a cut-through by residents of Mulbarton.
Also Swainsthorpe has insufficient amenities to cope with extra housing.
Access to and from Swainsthorpe via the A140 is already extremely hazardous due to poor visibility in both directions, and this development would further increase the volume of traffic through the village which is already used as a cut-through by residents of Mulbarton.
Also Swainsthorpe has insufficient amenities to cope with extra housing.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17785
Received: 04/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Rachael Trivett
The infrastructure of swainsthorpe cannot cope with more houses, the traffic increase would be very detrimental to the small village. The A140 is bad enough now to try and get onto from swainsthorpe so more cars in the village will only add to this problem.
The infrastructure of swainsthorpe cannot cope with more houses, the traffic increase would be very detrimental to the small village. The A140 is bad enough now to try and get onto from swainsthorpe so more cars in the village will only add to this problem.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17812
Received: 26/11/2018
Respondent: Iris Makepeace
Three proposals have been submitted for the village of Swainsthorpe Norfolk.NR14 8PH. by Ben Burgess & Nicholas Gowing.
I have lived here for 35 years & I am against these developments. There is already Increased traffic through our village & difficult to to get on the A140 because of so many more vehicles. Our village is already a cut through for vehicles from Mulbarton.
.These men already think it is a done deal with the Council , surely the people of Swainsthorpe who pay their taxes & are 98% against these plans mean something.
Three proposals have been submitted for the village of Swainsthorpe Norfolk.NR14 8PH. by Ben Burgess & Nicholas Gowing.
I have lived here for 35 years & I am against these developments. There is already Increased traffic through our village & difficult to to get on the A140 because of so many more vehicles. Our village is already a cut through for vehicles from Mulbarton.
.These men already think it is a done deal with the Council , surely the people of Swainsthorpe who pay their taxes & are 98% against these plans mean something.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17856
Received: 05/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Tina Minns
I object to this proposal as access to the A140 is already problematic with ever increasing road accidents and long delays this will only dramatically increase. The wildlife will be adversely affected.
I object to this proposal as access to the A140 is already problematic with ever increasing road accidents and long delays this will only dramatically increase. The wildlife will be adversely affected.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17857
Received: 05/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Clare Thurlow
Swainsthorpe is a lovely village surrounded by lots of greenery and fields. Having the extra houses will destroy the green fields which make Swainsthorpe such a lovely village and will destroy the peace that currently exists in the village. The village cannot cope with 20 more houses, not the roads or the services. There are plenty of other places to build around Norwich which already have new estates so why not build additional housing there instead of ruining a lovely tranquil village.
Swainsthorpe is a lovely village surrounded by lots of greenery and fields. Having the extra houses will destroy the green fields which make Swainsthorpe such a lovely village and will destroy the peace that currently exists in the village. The village cannot cope with 20 more houses, not the roads or the services. There are plenty of other places to build around Norwich which already have new estates so why not build additional housing there instead of ruining a lovely tranquil village.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17862
Received: 05/12/2018
Respondent: Mr Ethan Bolingbroke
I strongly Object.
I strongly Object.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17876
Received: 06/12/2018
Respondent: mr martin bennett
effect on already unacceptable traffic use of local roads. increased pollution and inappropriate development of the existing local area
this proposal for 20 houses is totally unacceptable as it has the potential to add considerably to the already highly congested Church Road junction with the A140 in swainsthorpe. The A140 is one of the busiest roads in the area with daily queues through swainsthorpe into and out of norwich. Church Road is already overused with vehicles coming from the mulbarton area using this road as a "rat run". With this proposal will come increased pollution and the inappropriate development of agricultural land which falls outside the scope of development for a village of this size. Swaonsthorpe does not have any infrastructure ie shops or other facilities to support growth of this size.
Support
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17883
Received: 06/12/2018
Respondent: FW Properties
The revised arrangement for the two parts of this site would enable this land to be accessed by a new adopted highway using the existing field access from Church Road, which is owned by the same landowner. The new road can also be used for the utilities to the site. The revised arrangement also reduces the impact of the overhead powerlines to the west of this land. The development of this land would have minimal impact on existing properties and the listed buildings in the area. The boundaries of the land would be landscaped to provide a rural buffer.
The revised arrangement for the two parts of this site would enable this land to be accessed by a new adopted highway using the existing field access from Church Road, which is owned by the same landowner. The new road can also be used for the utilities to the site. The revised arrangement also reduces the impact of the overhead powerlines to the west of this land. The development of this land would have minimal impact on existing properties and the listed buildings in the area. The boundaries of the land would be landscaped to provide a rural buffer.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17888
Received: 06/12/2018
Respondent: Mr Michael Srokowski
This proposal would significantly change the character of the village and increase the volume of traffic accessing the A140, which is already an extremely unpleasant and potentially dangerous exercise. Other than the church the village has no amenities and therefore I feel that any additional housing projects would be more appropriate in areas where there is good existing amenity/infrastructure.
This proposal would significantly change the character of the village and increase the volume of traffic accessing the A140, which is already an extremely unpleasant and potentially dangerous exercise. Other than the church the village has no amenities and therefore I feel that any additional housing projects would be more appropriate in areas where there is good existing amenity/infrastructure.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17898
Received: 06/12/2018
Respondent: Mrs Corinne Boyce
Swainsthorpe is identified as a 'another' village with no services and the building of more housing would damage the integrity of this small village. Moreover, the proposed access from Church View is already on a very dangerous blind corner in the village where there have been several near misses when vehicles have been negotiating the bend.j
Swainsthorpe is identified as a 'another' village with no services and the building of more housing would damage the integrity of this small village. Moreover, the proposed access from Church View is already on a very dangerous blind corner in the village where there have been several near misses when vehicles have been negotiating the bend.j