GNLP0191R
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 19471
Received: 17/12/2018
Respondent: Lynne Hardesty
I am writing to object to three submissions lodged that directly impact the village. GNLP0604R. Ben Burgess - 25 houses off church view and GNLP 0191R. The impact on the village off traffic using Church Road, the traffic onto the Ben Burgess head quarters coming directly by the stoke holy cross turning, in the peak time its already impossible to get out our own drive let alone get onto A140. It is already used as a rat run from Mulbarton area to turn right you have to go to the Stoke turning and turn round to get to Long Stratton to the doctors and dentists etc. I am strongly opposed to these submission. I believe there are better sites for Ben Burgess HQ team on the A140. If you let more large vehicles out onto it you are increasing the risk of there being a very serious accidents, which could result in a major hold up and death.
I am writing to object to three submissions lodged that directly impact the village. GNLP0604R. Ben Burgess - 25 houses off church view and GNLP 0191R. The impact on the village off traffic using Church Road, the traffic onto the Ben Burgess head quarters coming directly by the stoke holy cross turning, in the peak time its already impossible to get out our own drive let alone get onto A140. It is already used as a rat run from Mulbarton area to turn right you have to go to the Stoke turning and turn round to get to Long Stratton to the doctors and dentists etc. I am strongly opposed to these submission. I believe there are better sites for Ben Burgess HQ team on the A140. If you let more large vehicles out onto it you are increasing the risk of there being a very serious accidents, which could result in a major hold up and death.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 19578
Received: 14/12/2018
Respondent: mr nigel dowdney
I have been shut out by your website and would like to object to the above 3 proposals.
On the grounds that Swainsthorpe does not need any major development, there are lack of facilities here to justify such development, the road network including the A140 is not substantial enough to sustain such a development and we are surrounded by beautiful green fields which is why we live here, such a development would ruin that. It would also have a massive detrimental effect on the sale prices of properties in the area.
I have been shut out by your website and would like to object to the above 3 proposals.
On the grounds that Swainsthorpe does not need any major development, there are lack of facilities here to justify such development, the road network including the A140 is not substantial enough to sustain such a development and we are surrounded by beautiful green fields which is why we live here, such a development would ruin that. It would also have a massive detrimental effect on the sale prices of properties in the area.
Object
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 19612
Received: 12/12/2018
Respondent: Miss Jenna Clarke
I object to the proposed development of green arable land to industrial use. I over look this area from my family home and feel that is does not comply with the 'other' village that is outline in the JCS. There is an abundance of wildlife in the area.
The change of use to industrial will also cause traffic chaos onto an already, busy, accident prone A140.
GNLP0604R - OBJECT
GNLP0191R - OBJECT
GNLP0542 - OBJECT
I object to the proposed development of green arable land to industrial use. I over look this area from my family home and feel that is does not comply with the 'other' village that is outline in the JCS. There is an abundance of wildlife in the area.
The change of use to industrial will also cause traffic chaos onto an already, busy, accident prone A140.
GNLP0604R - OBJECT
GNLP0191R - OBJECT
GNLP0542 - OBJECT