GNLPSL2007
Support
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 17230
Received: 20/11/2018
Respondent: Horsham and Newton St Faiths Parish Council
No objection to an extension of the existing employment area. The current one is well built and well run.
No objection to an extension of the existing employment area. The current one is well built and well run.
Support
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 19244
Received: 14/12/2018
Respondent: Horsham Properties Ltd
Agent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd
For additional information, and to supplement the comments submitted via the consultation portal, please see letter from Lawson Planning Partnership sent on behalf of Horsham Properties to the GNLP Policy Team under separate cover.
Horsham Properties note that the GNLP Settlement Summary suggests settlement boundaries will only be extended where development already exists on a site. Due to the presence of engineering operations and landscaping, required in connection with an implemented planning permission which extended the business park to the north, we would regard the allocated land to have a form and function which connects to the existing settlement and thus the settlement limits should be extended to enclose it.
However, notwithstanding the GNLP's position on land to the west, we request that, as a minimum, the settlement boundaries are amended to include L-block and its operational land in the north. The land and buildings have been built, but are not presently included in the settlement limits of the village as shown on the revised Site Proposals maps in the New, Revised and Small Sites Consultation. Given that this building, and associated land around it presently function as part of the operational business park, they should clearly be included within the settlement limits extension.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
Representation ID: 19560
Received: 14/12/2018
Respondent: Horsham Properties Ltd
Agent: Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd
We note that the GNLP Settlement Summary suggests settlement boundaries will only be extended where development already exists on a site. Due to the presence of engineering operations and landscaping, required in connection with an implemented planning permission which extended the business park to the north, we would regard the allocated land to have a form and function which connects to the existing settlement and thus the settlement limits should be extended to enclose it.
However, notwithstanding the GNLP's position on land to the west, we request that, as a minimum, the settlement boundaries are amended to include L-block and its operational land in the north. The land and buildings have been built, but are not presently included in the settlement limits of the village as shown on the revised Site Proposals maps in the New, Revised and Small Sites Consultation. Given that this building, and associated land around it presently function as part of the operational business park, they should clearly be included within the settlement limits extension.
Please find enclosed two letters of support sent on behalf of Horsham Properties Ltd in relation to sites GNLPSL2007 (Abbey Farm Commercial Park Settlement Limit Extension) and GNLPSL0466 (Land North of Norwich Airport Allocation for Employment Uses). These letters contain additional information and are intended to supplement the comments we have already submitted online via the consultation portal in respect of this consultation.
See attachments