Site Proposals document
Search representations
Results for Salhouse Parish Council search
New searchObject
Site Proposals document
GNLP0095
Representation ID: 19792
Received: 14/12/2018
Respondent: Salhouse Parish Council
Considering the proposed sites for Rackheath, site numbers GNLP 0095, 2166, 2092 and 2040 will all contribute to the effect of continuous development from the Norwich city boundary to Salhouse, especially if the earlier sites nos. GNLP 0487 (now Planning Application 20170243), 0493, 0164 and 0163 were all allowed to go ahead within the Salhouse parish boundary. Development of these sites would conflict with Policy 2 of the JCS and Broadland Policy EN 2 as it would fail to maintain the strategic gap between the communities of Sprowston and Rackheath and Rackheath and Salhouse respectively, and would damage the landscape settings of the two villages and their approaches. It would
also conflict with Policy GT 2 Green Infrastructure of the Broadland North East Growth Triangle AAP which seeks to protect an area either side of the NDR from inappropriate development. Various other proposed sites in Rackheath also conflict with this policy.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0164
Representation ID: 19793
Received: 14/12/2018
Respondent: Salhouse Parish Council
We would object to this on the grounds that (1) there would be an adverse visual impact on the setting of the Salhouse Conservation Area which adjoins the site (in contravention of Conservations Area policies); (2) there would be an adverse impact on the historic setting of Salhouse Hall, a Grade II listed building; (3) there would be an adverse impact on the historic setting of Hall Drive and the Coach Drive, both parts of the historic settings of Salhouse Hall and the Conservation Area.
Does not comply with policy H1 of the Salhouse Neighbourhood Plan.
Some small scale development along Norwich Road might be acceptable, although this might be considered 'ribbon development'. The lack of any detail of the scale or type of development make it impossible to comment further.