Site Proposals document
Search representations
Results for Claxton Parish Council search
New searchObject
Site Proposals document
GNLP0530
Representation ID: 12862
Received: 27/01/2018
Respondent: Claxton Parish Council
I object to this proposal as a resident of Claxton (not on behalf of the Parish Council). It proposes an 8-house development in the middle of Grade 2 agricultural land across from a residential care home. There are no other buildings on that side of Church Lane, a narrow country track unsuitable for HGVs and with no space for traffic or pedestrians to pass. It would ruin the outlook completely. I understand there are certain protected species in this location but do not have the details.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0530
Representation ID: 14243
Received: 17/03/2018
Respondent: Claxton Parish Council
This objection is from Claxton Parish Council following their meeting this week. The site is well outside any designated development areas in the village which follow The Street. This is an elevated greenfield site on higher grade agricultural land, with poor access to services, on a narrow single lane country road in an area regularly affected by extensive flooding. Large agricultural vehicles use Church Lane and the surrounding roads regularly and any further development would create an unwelcome increase in traffic. The Settlement Summary also states that there is a designated species recorded at this site.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0531
Representation ID: 16226
Received: 28/02/2018
Respondent: Claxton Parish Council
Major risk of further severe flooding from run-off from 200 houses on elevated site. Unnecessary increase in traffic raises risk to residents and congestion on narrow roads with more than their share of large vehicles.
Outside development boundary. Poor site access. Bends, hill, poor sightlines present an unacceptable risk of traffic-related incidents. Surgery and school could not handle population increase. Road is National Cycle Route 1. 300+ vehicles from 200 homes would severely impact cyclists, walkers and tourists. Site borders Broads National Park, nearby SSSI and County Wildlife Sites. Impact would be hugely detrimental to environmentally important landscape.