Site Proposals document
Search representations
Results for Costessey Town Council search
New searchObject
Site Proposals document
GNLP0039
Representation ID: 13050
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
: REFUSE: Not a suitable site. There is a High-Pressure Gas Main in the vicinity and a Gas Pumping Station adjacent to the site. This is in the designated river valley and the flood plain between the R Tud and the R Wensum and is separate from the rest of Costessey development.
: REFUSE: Not a suitable site. There is a High-Pressure Gas Main in the vicinity and a Gas Pumping Station adjacent to the site. This is in the designated river valley and the flood plain between the R Tud and the R Wensum and is separate from the rest of Costessey development.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0206
Representation ID: 13051
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not suitable.High pressure gas main runs through.In designated River Valley.Would impact on valuable landscape characteristics of river valley AND on the surrounding characteristics of area and listed church adjacent.Access from dangerous brow of hill or Longwater Lane by bridge - rat run. River does flood in valley plain - wide variations in height after rain.History of refusals along river valley;Doctor's surgery only approved on condition that it was not a residential dwelling.Costessey Centre built on the site of previous building not by the river due to river valley and flood plain.No overriding community benefit would justify development on this site.
Not suitable.High pressure gas main runs through.In designated River Valley.Would impact on valuable landscape characteristics of river valley AND on the surrounding characteristics of area and listed church adjacent.Access from dangerous brow of hill or Longwater Lane by bridge - rat run. River does flood in valley plain - wide variations in height after rain.History of refusals along river valley;Doctor's surgery only approved on condition that it was not a residential dwelling.Costessey Centre built on the site of previous building not by the river due to river valley and flood plain.No overriding community benefit would justify development on this site.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0238
Representation ID: 13053
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not a suitable site. In the designated River Valley (which should be extended to the edge of East Hills Woods and to cover the whole of this site for consistency). In a floodplain, which regularly floods. Appears on official flood maps for both surface water and fluvial flooding risks. Contaminated land. Applications on this site have been rejected TWICE by SNC's DMC on the grounds of damage to the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley (2015/2927, 2016/2430 & 2017/0420). Difficult and unsuitable access from the brow of the hill. Unsustainable location.
Not a suitable site. In the designated River Valley (which should be extended to the edge of East Hills Woods and to cover the whole of this site for consistency). In a floodplain, which regularly floods. Appears on official flood maps for both surface water and fluvial flooding risks. Contaminated land. Applications on this site have been rejected TWICE by SNC's DMC on the grounds of damage to the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley (2015/2927, 2016/2430 & 2017/0420). Difficult and unsuitable access from the brow of the hill. Unsustainable location.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0243
Representation ID: 13054
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not a suitable site. Would set a precedent for backland development in the river valley and would impact on the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley.
Not a suitable site. Would set a precedent for backland development in the river valley and would impact on the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley.
Support
Site Proposals document
GNLP0266
Representation ID: 13055
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
MIXED USE WITH CAVEATS. Concerns about breaching contaminated landfill site. C/7/2017/7018 to extend use of gas compound until 2030, so site not available. site suffered from gases before capped. farmers' livestock killed, crops affected. high-pressure gas main runs through. CTC does NOT support relief road here - would exit onto A1074 opposite entrance to LF2 - should exit onto the A47 or Longwater Interchange. Protected woodland on A1074. north-west spur towards golf course should not be developed close to river valley, amenity land for residential. S106, CIL provide infrastructure improvement at Longwater Interchange and surrounding roads / schools /surgeries.
MIXED USE WITH CAVEATS. Concerns about breaching contaminated landfill site. C/7/2017/7018 to extend use of gas compound until 2030, so site not available. site suffered from gases before capped. farmers' livestock killed, crops affected. high-pressure gas main runs through. CTC does NOT support relief road here - would exit onto A1074 opposite entrance to LF2 - should exit onto the A47 or Longwater Interchange. Protected woodland on A1074. north-west spur towards golf course should not be developed close to river valley, amenity land for residential. S106, CIL provide infrastructure improvement at Longwater Interchange and surrounding roads / schools /surgeries.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0284
Representation ID: 13056
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not a suitable site. In the designated River Valley and would impact on the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley. Would impact on the surrounding characteristics of the area and the listed church adjacent. Access from the brow of the hill. TWO previous applications on this site have been turned down.
Not a suitable site. In the designated River Valley and would impact on the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley. Would impact on the surrounding characteristics of the area and the listed church adjacent. Access from the brow of the hill. TWO previous applications on this site have been turned down.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0468
Representation ID: 13057
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not a suitable site. Opposite the exit to Queen's Hills bus lane. This area floods, as does Taverham Lane. This is in the River valley of the R. Wensum. Nearby tracks are not adopted and there is a possibility that nearby Costessey Pits which provide Norwich's drinking water, could be contaminated. There are no mains sewers in this location and the site is detached from the rest of Costessey's development.
Not a suitable site. Opposite the exit to Queen's Hills bus lane. This area floods, as does Taverham Lane. This is in the River valley of the R. Wensum. Nearby tracks are not adopted and there is a possibility that nearby Costessey Pits which provide Norwich's drinking water, could be contaminated. There are no mains sewers in this location and the site is detached from the rest of Costessey's development.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0489
Representation ID: 13058
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not a suitable site. Anglian Water have many large pipes (approx. 32 pipes) running underground through this site including a high-pressure water supply pipe from East Hills Woods into Norwich, a main sewer pipe and an attenuation tank between the two. These pipes are over 2m high and in the bottom south east corner where the site narrows, there is a main drain from Bowthorpe running to the River Wensum and the River Tud floods across part of this site - it is currently covered in mud.
Not a suitable site. Anglian Water have many large pipes (approx. 32 pipes) running underground through this site including a high-pressure water supply pipe from East Hills Woods into Norwich, a main sewer pipe and an attenuation tank between the two. These pipes are over 2m high and in the bottom south east corner where the site narrows, there is a main drain from Bowthorpe running to the River Wensum and the River Tud floods across part of this site - it is currently covered in mud.
Object
Site Proposals document
GNLP0510
Representation ID: 13059
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Not a suitable site. Previous applications turned down as in the designated river valley (latest was 2014/1036). Would set a precedent for backland development in the river valley and would impact on the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley. Would be a loss of green amenity land. Access onto Longwater Lane would be difficult as this is a busy and congested rat run. Longwater Lane is subject to regular surface water flooding, the slope onto the site make flooding of the properties more likely.
Not a suitable site. Previous applications turned down as in the designated river valley (latest was 2014/1036). Would set a precedent for backland development in the river valley and would impact on the valuable landscape characteristics of the river valley. Would be a loss of green amenity land. Access onto Longwater Lane would be difficult as this is a busy and congested rat run. Longwater Lane is subject to regular surface water flooding, the slope onto the site make flooding of the properties more likely.
Support
Site Proposals document
GNLP0581
Representation ID: 13060
Received: 14/02/2018
Respondent: Costessey Town Council
Mixed residential and industrial. Access via Bowthorpe roundabout NOT Dereham Road & Lodge Farm.power cables now underground, pylons removed. Although in river valley, it's considerably higher (contours at 40m rather than 20m along R Tud Valley). development here avoids flood plain and most of river valley. Amenity land adjacent to south. S106 and CIL to provide infrastructure at Longwater Interchange and surrounding roads, schools, surgeries.bus link extension via Bowthorpe roundabout to Showground and Easton opportunities for bus lanes and cycleways to discourage cars. development needs MINIMUM TWO exits.
Mixed residential and industrial. Access via Bowthorpe roundabout NOT Dereham Road & Lodge Farm.power cables now underground, pylons removed. Although in river valley, it's considerably higher (contours at 40m rather than 20m along R Tud Valley). development here avoids flood plain and most of river valley. Amenity land adjacent to south. S106 and CIL to provide infrastructure at Longwater Interchange and surrounding roads, schools, surgeries.bus link extension via Bowthorpe roundabout to Showground and Easton opportunities for bus lanes and cycleways to discourage cars. development needs MINIMUM TWO exits.
