Site Proposals document

The site does not relate to and is not contiguous to the existing settlement of Hainford.
The site has significant flooding issues and ditches abutting the site are overflowing.It is current planning direct development towards areas with the lowest probability of flooding.
There would be a reliance upon narrow rural roads to access the site. The narrow rural roads in this location are inadequate for the increased volume of traffic the site would generate and in many locations it is impossible for two vehicles to pass safely.
It is an unsuitable location due to the rural landscape setting.
It is an unsuitable location due to the close proximity to the junction with the Buxton Rd.
The site lies outside the development boundary.
wider development in this location would be unsustainable due to lack of infrastructure services,power supplies and general facilities to support this level of development.
The site is not connected to footway links and there would be a reliance upon the private motor vehicle which is contrary to sustainability and policies.

1. Site is arable land outside the development boundary, remote from and out of scale with the existing village scene. "The site would produce development disproportionate to the existing settlement pattern but is not large enough to provide or support additional services." It is disproportionate to the status, size and aspect of the village.
2.There appears to be an access road planned from the B1354 'old church road', such a road would;
Interfere with the natural peaceful setting of the church to the east and the burial ground to the west
The road would be directly adjacent to an 'active burial ground', just a few meters from the edge of any access road. The point at which the new road junction/entrance/exit joins the B1354 is located on a fast (National Speed Limit) road with limited visibility due to the inclination of the road and trees

3.Access to the site via Stratton road would create a dangerous situation as Stratton Road is in places only wide enough for access by one car at a time.

4.A number of trees could potentially be affected in making any access road.

5.This proposed site where the houses would be located is on an area known to be subject to surface water flooding. There have also been long standing issues with sewer capacity in the area of Stratton road causing problems with the pumping station and residents toilets overflowing.

There is. widespread flooding throughout Hainford due to high water table and overflowing ditches.

It is current planning policy to steer development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding

6. The site is in conflict with Hainfords status of 'other village' which by the definition stated in the GNLP still applies

7. The Development would be in conflict with Hainfords Parish Plan.

8. The Development would be unsustainable due to lack of adequate infrastructure services, general facilities, limited power supplies with a reliance upon oil, electricity power failures and lack of transport services to support this level of development. (when commenting recently on a single dwelling proposal in the Grange Rd area the highways response was
"in regard to transport sustainability Hainford, which has very limited standard every day facilities is not Considered an acceptable location, the site is not connected to footway links which, in any case, are Sporadic in the village and public transport services are very limited. Accordingly the proposed Development will result in an over reliance of the private car contrary to sustainability objective
9..The narrow rural lanes throughout Hainford are inadequate for the increased volume of traffic and there is insufficient room for two vehicles to pass in many locations. There would be increased congestion at the junction between A140 and B1354(Waterloo Rd).
10. The Primary school is not accessible as there is only one pavement running from Stratton/waterloo area. There are no pavements from the main settlement in the chapel road area to the South, nor from the West/ A140 Cromer Rd nor from the Eastern side of the village. The reliance being on the private motor vehicle for safe access to the school which is contrary to sustainability objectives
12.The Primary school is small and would not be able to accommodate increased volume of pupils generated If wider development were allowed on this scale

13. Loss of rural amenity-the site has landscape value.

1.The proposed development would impact on the setting of Hainford Hall

2.This area of the village is known for longstanding and continuing flooding and unresolved drainage problems.The site is on an area known to be subject to surface water flooding.The ditches nearby are over flowing. The sewerage capacity is known to be inadequate in this location.

There is. Widespread flooding throughout Hainford due to high water table and overflowing ditches.

It is current planning policy to direct development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding.

3.The site lies outside the Development Boundary.

4. The site is disproportionate to the status, size and aspect of the village.

5.. The site is in conflict with Hainfords status of 'other village' which by definition stated in the GNLP still applies.

6.. The Development would be in conflict with Hainfords Parish Plan.

7. Wider development in this location would be unsustainable due to lack of adequate infrastructure services,general facilities ,limited power supplies( reliance upon oil) electricity power cuts and lack of transport services to support this level of development. (when commenting recently on a single dwelling proposal in the Grange Rd area the Highways response was
"in regard to transport sustainability Hainford, which has very limited standard every day facilities is not Considered an acceptable location, the site is not connected to footway links which, in any case, are Sporadic in the village and public transport services are very limited. Accordingly the proposed Development will result in an over reliance of the private car contrary to sustainability objective
8.The narrow and winding rural lanes in this location are inadequate for increased volume of traffic and in many locations it is impossible for two vehicles to pass safely. There would be increased congestion at the junction between A140 and B1354(Waterloo Rd).Also potential congestion at the junction with Newton Rd and the B1354.
9. The Primary school is not accessible by definition as there is only one pavement running from Stratton/waterloo area. There are no pavements from the main settlement in the chapel road area to the South, nor from the West/ A140 Cromer Rd nor from the Eastern side of the village. The reliance being on the private motor vehicle for safe access to the school which is contrary to sustainability objectives
10.The Primary school is small and would not be able to accommodate increased volume of pupils generated If wider development were allowed on this scale

11. Loss of rural amenity-the site has landscape value.

1.The proposed development would impact on the setting of Hainford Hall and is not well related to the existing village.

2. The size of the site and potential volume of dwellings is wholly disproportionate to the status,size and aspect of the village.

3..This area of the village is known for longstanding and continuing flooding and unresolved drainage problems.The site is on an area known to be subject to surface water flooding.The sewerage capacity in this location is known to be inadequate.

There is Widespread flooding throughout Hainford due to high water table and overflowing ditches

. Current planning Policy is to steer development to areas with lowest probability of flooding.

4.The site lies outside the Development Boundary.

5. The site is in conflict with Hainfords status of 'other village' which by definition stated in the GNLP still applies.

6. The Development would be in conflict with Hainfords Parish Plan.

7. Wider development in this location would be unsustainable due to lack of adequate infrastructure services, general facilities,limited power supplies, reliance upon oil, electricity power failures and lack of transport services to support this level of development. (when commenting recently on a single dwelling proposal in the Grange Rd area the Highways response was
"in regard to transport sustainability Hainford, which has very limited standard every day facilities is not Considered an acceptable location, the site is not connected to footway links which, in any case, are Sporadic in the village and public transport services are very limited. Accordingly the proposed Development will result in an over reliance of the private car contrary to sustainability objective
8..Narrow and winding rural lanes in this location are inadequate for increased volume of traffic.in many locations it is impossible for two vehicles to pass safely. There would be increased congestion at the junction between A140 and B1354(Waterloo Rd).Also potential congestion at the junction with Newton Rd and the B1354.
9. The Primary school is not accessible by definition as there is only one pavement running from Stratton/waterloo area. There are no pavements from the main settlement in the chapel road area to the South, nor from the West/ A140 Cromer Rd nor from the Eastern side of the village. The reliance being on the private motor vehicle for safe access to the school which is contrary to sustainability objectives
10.The Primary school is small and would not be able to accommodate increased volume of pupils generated If wider development were allowed on this scale.
11. Loss of rural amenity-the site has landscape value.
12.Potential loss of trees

1.This site was previously objected to by the Environment Agency , due to very significant risk of flooding,

2. It would infringe on the school car park and be detrimental to the setting of the church,

3.There are existing problems with speed/parking along Newton Rd.

2. Loss of mature oaks to provide visibility splay.

4.This site is on an area known to be subject to significant surface water flooding. There have also been long standing issues with sewer capacity in the area of Stratton road nearby causing problems with the pumping station and residents toilets overflowing. Flooding is widespread throughout Hainford with overflowing ditches and flooding onto the roads.

It is current planning policy to direct development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding.

5. The site is outside the Development Boundary.

6.. the site is disproportionate to the status, size and aspect of the village

7.. The site is in conflict with Hainfords status of 'other village' which by definition stated in the GNLP still applies.

8. The Development would be in conflict with Hainfords Parish Plan.

9. The Development would be unsustainable due to lack of adequate infrastructure services, general facilities, limited power supplies with a reliance upon oil, electricity power failures and lack of transport services to support this level of development. (when commenting recently on a single dwelling proposal in the Grange Rd area the Highways response was
"in regard to transport sustainability Hainford, which has very limited standard every day facilities is not Considered an acceptable location, the site is not connected to footway links which, in any case, are Sporadic in the village and public transport services are very limited. Accordingly the proposed Development will result in an over reliance of the private car contrary to sustainability objective
10..Narrow winding rural lanes throughout Hainford are inadequate for increased volume of traffic.In many locations there is insufficient room for two vehicles to pass safely.There would be increased congestion at the junction between A140 and B1354(Waterloo Rd).Also potential congestion at the junction with Newton Rd and the B1354.
11.The Primary school is small and would not be able to accommodate increased volume of pupils generated If wider development were allowed on this scale
12. Loss of rural amenity-the site has landscape value.

1.This is a site which can take a lot more than 12 dwellings and is disproportionate to the status ,size and aspect of the village it does not relate to and is not contiguous to the existing settlement..

2.Unsuitable location due to rural landscape setting.We have been advised that there are TPO's in force along this stretch of the road and a likely impact on wildlife in this area.

3.Part 2 of the site is an unsuitable location at the junction with Hall Rd with regard to traffic safety.

4. There is known flooding on these two sites and overflowing ditches with flooding on the junction with Hall Rd.The Hall Rd area of the village is known for longstanding and continuing flooding and unresolved drainage problems which are widespread throughout Hainford.
.It is current planning policy to direct development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding.

5. There have also been long standing issues with sewer capacity in the area of Stratton road causing problems with the pumping station and residents toilets overflowing.

6.The site lies outside the Development Boundary.

7. The site is in conflict with Hainfords status of 'other village' which by definition stated in the GNLP still applies.

8. The development would be in conflict with Hainford's Parish Plan.

9. Wider development in this location would be unsustainable due to lack of adequate infrastructure services, general facilities, limited power supplies with a reliancee upon oil and frequent power cuts and limited transport services to support this level of development. (when commenting recently on a single dwelling proposal in the Grange Rd area the Highways response was
"in regard to transport sustainability Hainford, which has very limited standard every day facilities is not Considered an acceptable location, the site is not connected to footway links which, in any case, are Sporadic in the village and public transport services are very limited. Accordingly the proposed Development will result in an over reliance of the private car contrary to sustainability objective
10. There would be a reliance upon narrow rural roads to access the site.
The narrow rural lanes in this location are inadequate for increased volume of traffic and in many locations it is impossible for two vehicles to pass safely. There would be increased congestion at the junction between A140 and B1354(Waterloo Rd).Also potential congestion at the junction with Newton Rd and the B1354
11. The Primary school is not accessible by definition as there is only one pavement running from Stratton/waterloo area. There are no pavements from the main settlement in the chapel road area to the South, nor from the West/ A140 Cromer Rd nor from the Eastern side of the village. The reliance being on the private motor vehicle for safe access to the school which is contrary to sustainability objectives
12.The Primary school is small and would not be able to accommodate increased volume of pupils generated If wider development were allowed on this scale.
13. we have been advised that the site is restricted to buildings or replacement buildings of an agricultural nature HOU9

1.The size of the site and potential volume of dwellings is wholly disproportionate and out of scale to the status, size, and aspect of the village and is not contiguous with the main part of the village.

2.The proposed site is subject to significant longstanding flooding and drainage issues with neighbouring dwellings already affected, wider development would exacerbate this existing problem. This area of the village is subject to long standing and unresolved flooding and drainage issues.
It is current planning policy to direct development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding.

3.There have also been long standing issues with sewer capacity in the area of Stratton road causing problems with the pumping station and residents toilets overflowing.

4.The site contains trees subject to Tree preservation order.There are also Tree preservation orders in force along Newton Rd in this vicinity..

5. The land is subject to Agricultural use planning restrictions.

6..The site lies outside the Development Boundary.

7. The site is in conflict with Hainfords status of 'other village' which by definition stated in the GNLP still applies.

8. The Development would be in conflict with Hainfords Parish Plan.

9. Wider development in this location would be unsustainable due to lack of adequate infrastructure services, general facilities ,limited ,power supplies(with a reliance upon oil) and limited transport services to support this level of development. (when commenting recently on a single dwelling proposal in the Grange Rd area the Highways response was
"in regard to transport sustainability Hainford, which has very limited standard every day facilities is not Considered an acceptable location, the site is not connected to footway links which, in any case, are Sporadic in the village and public transport services are very limited. Accordingly the proposed Development will result in an over reliance of the private car contrary to sustainability objective
10. The narrow rural lanes in this location are inadequate for increased volume of traffic and in many locations it is impossible for two vehicles to pass safely . There would be increased congestion at the junction between A140 and B1354(Waterloo Rd).Also potential congestion at the junction with Newton Rd and the B1354.
11. The Primary school is not accessible by definition as there is only one pavement running from Stratton/waterloo area. There are no pavements from the main settlement in the chapel road area to the South, nor from the West/ A140 Cromer Rd nor from the Eastern side of the village. The reliance being on the private motor vehicle for safe access to the school which is contrary to sustainability objectives
12.The Primary school is small and would not be able to accommodate increased volume of pupils generated If wider development were allowed on this scale.
13. Loss of rural amenity-the site has landscape value. Residents have expressed their concerns at risk to wildlife on this site.