New, Revised and Small Sites

Search Representations

Results for Swardeston Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

GNLP2165

Representation ID: 19553

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Swardeston Parish Council

Representation:

GNLP2165 - Wymondham Road, East Carleton
This road is entirely unsuitable for use to access additional dwellings and a business park and offices as suggested. There is no demand for such facilities that would outweigh the negative impact on a small country lane and the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

Full text:

East Carleton & Ketteringham parish council has reviewed the additional sites and has the following comments to make:
East Carleton is designated as a rural village with no amenities and if additional amenities were to be provided for example a shop it would prove unsustainable. There is a proposal for a village green to be provided however the parish council has a 54-acre country park within easy walking distance of all of theproposed sites.
Any access to schools, shops medical facilities would all require the use of a car, as there is no access to any public transport. The nearest failities are in either Hethersett or Mulbarton and these are already under great strain.

GNLP2165 - Wymondham Road, East Carleton
This road is entirely unsuitable for use to access additional dwellings and a business park and offices as suggested. There is no demand for such facilities that would outweigh the negative impact on a small country lane and the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

GNP2167 - Hethersett Road
This piece of land is beyond the existing development of the village and the road that serves the village is unsuitable for additional housing being built in this location, the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

GNLP2152 - Hethersett Road
This piece of land would be backfill development and would have a negative impact on existing residents and the historic church. The same objection applies to this site as it does to GNLP2167 that the roads are unsuitable to support additional housing or business.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

GNLP2167

Representation ID: 19554

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Swardeston Parish Council

Representation:

This piece of land is beyond the existing development of the village and the road that serves the village is unsuitable for additional housing being built in this location, the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

Full text:

East Carleton & Ketteringham parish council has reviewed the additional sites and has the following comments to make:
East Carleton is designated as a rural village with no amenities and if additional amenities were to be provided for example a shop it would prove unsustainable. There is a proposal for a village green to be provided however the parish council has a 54-acre country park within easy walking distance of all of theproposed sites.
Any access to schools, shops medical facilities would all require the use of a car, as there is no access to any public transport. The nearest failities are in either Hethersett or Mulbarton and these are already under great strain.

GNLP2165 - Wymondham Road, East Carleton
This road is entirely unsuitable for use to access additional dwellings and a business park and offices as suggested. There is no demand for such facilities that would outweigh the negative impact on a small country lane and the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

GNP2167 - Hethersett Road
This piece of land is beyond the existing development of the village and the road that serves the village is unsuitable for additional housing being built in this location, the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

GNLP2152 - Hethersett Road
This piece of land would be backfill development and would have a negative impact on existing residents and the historic church. The same objection applies to this site as it does to GNLP2167 that the roads are unsuitable to support additional housing or business.

Object

New, Revised and Small Sites

GNLP2152

Representation ID: 19555

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Swardeston Parish Council

Representation:

This piece of land would be backfill development and would have a negative impact on existing residents and the historic church. The same objection applies to this site as it does to GNLP2167 that the roads are unsuitable to support additional housing or business.

Full text:

East Carleton & Ketteringham parish council has reviewed the additional sites and has the following comments to make:
East Carleton is designated as a rural village with no amenities and if additional amenities were to be provided for example a shop it would prove unsustainable. There is a proposal for a village green to be provided however the parish council has a 54-acre country park within easy walking distance of all of theproposed sites.
Any access to schools, shops medical facilities would all require the use of a car, as there is no access to any public transport. The nearest failities are in either Hethersett or Mulbarton and these are already under great strain.

GNLP2165 - Wymondham Road, East Carleton
This road is entirely unsuitable for use to access additional dwellings and a business park and offices as suggested. There is no demand for such facilities that would outweigh the negative impact on a small country lane and the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

GNP2167 - Hethersett Road
This piece of land is beyond the existing development of the village and the road that serves the village is unsuitable for additional housing being built in this location, the parish council is opposed to this site being included in the local plan.

GNLP2152 - Hethersett Road
This piece of land would be backfill development and would have a negative impact on existing residents and the historic church. The same objection applies to this site as it does to GNLP2167 that the roads are unsuitable to support additional housing or business.

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

GNLP2109

Representation ID: 19556

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Swardeston Parish Council

Representation:

These 2 sites are for commercial development and it was agreed that would be appropriate for the location. It was considered that the area would benefit from development and was a logical extension and use of the site.

Full text:

Bracon Ash and Hethel Parish Council has considered the consultation documentation and has the following comments to make: -
GNLP2109 and GNLP 2097
These 2 sites are for commercial development and it was agreed that would be appropriate for the location. It was considered that the area would benefit from development and was a logical extension and use of the site.
GNLP 2087
This site was discussed earlier in the meeting as the developer had already had plans drawn for it. The scale, plans and design were considered to be good; concerns about specific issues such as drainage would need to be addressed at the planning stage.
The proposed access into Cuckoofield Lane was considered to be a sensible option but serious concerns were raised about pedestrian access to Mulbarton where the local services were such as schools, shops and doctors surgery. The pavement is far too narrow and with family sized homes being built there would be need to be improvements to enable access to Mulbarton without a reliance on cars.
If developed in line with outline proposals, subject to usual planning controls the parish council would have no objections to this being included in the local plan.

Support

New, Revised and Small Sites

GNLP2097

Representation ID: 19557

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Swardeston Parish Council

Representation:

These 2 sites are for commercial development and it was agreed that would be appropriate for the location. It was considered that the area would benefit from development and was a logical extension and use of the site.

Full text:

Bracon Ash and Hethel Parish Council has considered the consultation documentation and has the following comments to make: -
GNLP2109 and GNLP 2097
These 2 sites are for commercial development and it was agreed that would be appropriate for the location. It was considered that the area would benefit from development and was a logical extension and use of the site.
GNLP 2087
This site was discussed earlier in the meeting as the developer had already had plans drawn for it. The scale, plans and design were considered to be good; concerns about specific issues such as drainage would need to be addressed at the planning stage.
The proposed access into Cuckoofield Lane was considered to be a sensible option but serious concerns were raised about pedestrian access to Mulbarton where the local services were such as schools, shops and doctors surgery. The pavement is far too narrow and with family sized homes being built there would be need to be improvements to enable access to Mulbarton without a reliance on cars.
If developed in line with outline proposals, subject to usual planning controls the parish council would have no objections to this being included in the local plan.

Comment

New, Revised and Small Sites

GNLP2087

Representation ID: 19558

Received: 14/12/2018

Respondent: Swardeston Parish Council

Representation:

This site was discussed earlier in the meeting as the developer had already had plans drawn for it. The scale, plans and design were considered to be good; concerns about specific issues such as drainage would need to be addressed at the planning stage.
The proposed access into Cuckoofield Lane was considered to be a sensible option but serious concerns were raised about pedestrian access to Mulbarton where the local services were such as schools, shops and doctors surgery. The pavement is far too narrow and with family sized homes being built there would be need to be improvements to enable access to Mulbarton without a reliance on cars.
If developed in line with outline proposals, subject to usual planning controls the parish council would have no objections to this being included in the local plan.

Full text:

Bracon Ash and Hethel Parish Council has considered the consultation documentation and has the following comments to make: -
GNLP2109 and GNLP 2097
These 2 sites are for commercial development and it was agreed that would be appropriate for the location. It was considered that the area would benefit from development and was a logical extension and use of the site.
GNLP 2087
This site was discussed earlier in the meeting as the developer had already had plans drawn for it. The scale, plans and design were considered to be good; concerns about specific issues such as drainage would need to be addressed at the planning stage.
The proposed access into Cuckoofield Lane was considered to be a sensible option but serious concerns were raised about pedestrian access to Mulbarton where the local services were such as schools, shops and doctors surgery. The pavement is far too narrow and with family sized homes being built there would be need to be improvements to enable access to Mulbarton without a reliance on cars.
If developed in line with outline proposals, subject to usual planning controls the parish council would have no objections to this being included in the local plan.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.