New, Revised and Small Sites
Search representations
Results for John Long Planning search
New searchSupport
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2149
Representation ID: 18561
Received: 12/12/2018
Respondent: John Long Planning
Agent: John Long Planning
Site Assessment_GNLP2149 is supported. The site remains available/suitable for development. The assessment shows Access/transport/roads as 'amber'. It should be notated 'green'. NCC Highways (letter: Jonathan Hanner ref:9/5/18/1043-19/7/18) confirms that suitable access can be achieved with minor works: "...In order to cater for the additional traffic generated...widen the access to ensure a minimum width of 5m for the first 10 metres into the site. This can be simply achieved by relocating the kerb and resurfacing the grass verge (to coincide with the existing length of surfacing)." I can confirm the required minor works are in the public highway/landowners control and deliverable.
Site Assessment_GNLP2149 is supported. The site remains available/suitable for development. The assessment shows Access/transport/roads as 'amber'. It should be notated 'green'. NCC Highways (letter: Jonathan Hanner ref:9/5/18/1043-19/7/18) confirms that suitable access can be achieved with minor works: "...In order to cater for the additional traffic generated...widen the access to ensure a minimum width of 5m for the first 10 metres into the site. This can be simply achieved by relocating the kerb and resurfacing the grass verge (to coincide with the existing length of surfacing)." I can confirm the required minor works are in the public highway/landowners control and deliverable.
Comment
New, Revised and Small Sites
GNLP2148
Representation ID: 18565
Received: 12/12/2018
Respondent: John Long Planning
Agent: John Long Planning
The conclusion for site ref: GNLP2148, ie the site is considered 'suitable', is supported. However, certain potential 'constraints' appear unjustfied. There is no evidence to suggest that the site will impact on biodiversity/geodiversity. It would seem unlikely that a site of 12 dwellings could impact on an SSSI within 3km of the site. The site is not affected by flood risk and would be required to not make flood risk on Mill Road worse through on-site mitigation. Also the site is owned by a developer/landlord keen to build rental properties/starter homes. The analysis should be noted 'green' for these matters.
The conclusion for site ref: GNLP2148, ie the site is considered 'suitable', is supported. However, certain potential 'constraints' appear unjustfied. There is no evidence to suggest that the site will impact on biodiversity/geodiversity. It would seem unlikely that a site of 12 dwellings could impact on an SSSI within 3km of the site. The site is not affected by flood risk and would be required to not make flood risk on Mill Road worse through on-site mitigation. Also the site is owned by a developer/landlord keen to build rental properties/starter homes. The analysis should be noted 'green' for these matters.
