Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Search representations
Results for Reepham Town Council search
New searchSupport
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0096
Representation ID: 21366
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the findings that this is not a suitable site for housing development due to the proximity of the site to the adjacent industrial area of Collers Way. Given that the Collers Way industrial estate appears to be fully occupied and that the estate is very congested it was felt that serious consideration should be given to designating this site as suitable for commercial/light industrial development. If the site continues to be considered for housing development, concerns were raised about the distance from the Town centre and, in particular, the schools.
Reepham Town Council support the findings that this is not a suitable site for housing development due to the proximity of the site to the adjacent industrial area of Collers Way. Given that the Collers Way industrial estate appears to be fully occupied and that the estate is very congested it was felt that serious consideration should be given to designating this site as suitable for commercial/light industrial development. If the site continues to be considered for housing development, concerns were raised about the distance from the Town centre and, in particular, the schools.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0180
Representation ID: 21367
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this is not a suitable area for housing development as concerns were raised about access from the site to and from School Road/Whitwell Road. Given an adequate traffic management solution to the problem of vehicular access to the site and subject to the provision of sufficient land within the development area to allow for expansion of the primary school buildings and playing field the Council would have no objections to development on this site.
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this is not a suitable area for housing development as concerns were raised about access from the site to and from School Road/Whitwell Road. Given an adequate traffic management solution to the problem of vehicular access to the site and subject to the provision of sufficient land within the development area to allow for expansion of the primary school buildings and playing field the Council would have no objections to development on this site.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0183
Representation ID: 21369
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this would not be a suitable site for development as concerns were raised about access from the site to and from School Road/Whitwell Road. Given an adequate traffic management solution to the problem of vehicular access to the site and subject to the provision of sufficient land within the development area to allow for expansion of the primary school buildings and playing field the Council would have no objections to development on this site.
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this would not be a suitable site for development as concerns were raised about access from the site to and from School Road/Whitwell Road. Given an adequate traffic management solution to the problem of vehicular access to the site and subject to the provision of sufficient land within the development area to allow for expansion of the primary school buildings and playing field the Council would have no objections to development on this site.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0221
Representation ID: 21371
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable for housing development as it is acknowldged there would be a lack of a safe pedestrian access to and from the site. Given the location of the site it is unlikely that a safe pedestrian route from the site to the town centre could be created.
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable for housing development as it is acknowldged there would be a lack of a safe pedestrian access to and from the site. Given the location of the site it is unlikely that a safe pedestrian route from the site to the town centre could be created.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0353
Representation ID: 21374
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Concerns are the lack of safe pedestrian access from the sites to the town centre and the schools. The pavement along the Dereham road (only pedestrian access)is too narrow for pedestrians to pass others safely; neither does it extend to the frontages of the two sites on Dereham Road. Pedestrians leaving the site to the south of Dereham Road would have to cross the main road where visibility is restricted. It is unlikely that the existing pedestrian access could be improved to an acceptable standard. Sites are outside the settlement boundary and would represent an unwelcome and inappropriate development.
Concerns are the lack of safe pedestrian access from the sites to the town centre and the schools. The pavement along the Dereham road (only pedestrian access)is too narrow for pedestrians to pass others safely; neither does it extend to the frontages of the two sites on Dereham Road. Pedestrians leaving the site to the south of Dereham Road would have to cross the main road where visibility is restricted. It is unlikely that the existing pedestrian access could be improved to an acceptable standard. Sites are outside the settlement boundary and would represent an unwelcome and inappropriate development.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0543 A & B
Representation ID: 21376
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council supports teh conclusion that this site is not suitable for development as it is outside the settlement limit, it is not contiguous with existing development and there is no safe pedestrian access to the site. Concern was also expressed about the distance of the site from the town centre and schools.
Reepham Town Council supports teh conclusion that this site is not suitable for development as it is outside the settlement limit, it is not contiguous with existing development and there is no safe pedestrian access to the site. Concern was also expressed about the distance of the site from the town centre and schools.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP2026
Representation ID: 21385
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable for housing as access onto Orchard Lane for vehciles was not suitable and there was no road widening opportunity.
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable for housing as access onto Orchard Lane for vehciles was not suitable and there was no road widening opportunity.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP2075
Representation ID: 21386
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable as it is furthest away from local
amenities, including the school, without footpath provision and development would be restricted due to proposed cable route.
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable as it is furthest away from local
amenities, including the school, without footpath provision and development would be restricted due to proposed cable route.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP1007
Representation ID: 21387
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reepham Town Council
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable for housing as it is understood this site has been proposed for an extension to the sewage works.
Reepham Town Council support the conclusion that this site is unsuitable for housing as it is understood this site has been proposed for an extension to the sewage works.
