Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Search representations
Results for Reedham Parish Council search
New searchObject
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP1001
Representation ID: 21361
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reedham Parish Council
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 2 issue 1 as the site cannot provide “safe, convenient and sustainable access to ... local services and facilities including schools, healthcare, shops, leisure/community/faith facilities” without the use of a car.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347 as there is no safe walking route to school. Highways confirm it is not feasible to provide an off-carriageway pedestrian facility to enable safe journeys to school.
The sewerage system in the village is at near capacity already.
The road infrastructure to and around the village is not suitable for a permanent increase in traffic.
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 2 issue 1 as the site cannot provide “safe, convenient and sustainable access to ... local services and facilities including schools, healthcare, shops, leisure/community/faith facilities” without the use of a car.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347 as there is no safe walking route to school. Highways confirm it is not feasible to provide an off-carriageway pedestrian facility to enable safe journeys to school.
The sewerage system in the village is at near capacity already.
The road infrastructure to and around the village is not suitable for a permanent increase in traffic.
Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP3003
Representation ID: 21363
Received: 16/03/2020
Respondent: Reedham Parish Council
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347. Highways confirm it is not feasible to provide a footway to enable safe journeys to school.
Highways confirm it is not feasible to provide a safe access for this site as the carriageway is narrower than required for 2-way traffic. There is not enough room to provide an adequate visibility splay.
There is no evidence to support Mill Road being “lightly trafficked”.
The sewerage system in the village is at near capacity already.
The road infrastructure to and around the village is not suitable for a permanent increase in traffic.
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347. Highways confirm it is not feasible to provide a footway to enable safe journeys to school.
Highways confirm it is not feasible to provide a safe access for this site as the carriageway is narrower than required for 2-way traffic. There is not enough room to provide an adequate visibility splay.
There is no evidence to support Mill Road being “lightly trafficked”.
The sewerage system in the village is at near capacity already.
The road infrastructure to and around the village is not suitable for a permanent increase in traffic.
