Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Support

Representation ID: 20156

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports the consultation method of grouping the parishes of Poringland Framingham Earl, Framingham Pigot and well-related parts of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross.
Poringland Parish Council supports the recommendation of no new allocations.

Support

Representation ID: 20157

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports the recommendation that there are no reasonable alternatives for development in Poringland, Framingham Earl and Framingham Pigot (including well related parts of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross) for the reasons of there already being high amounts of existing commitments in the area and the environmental and infractruture constraints.

Support

Representation ID: 20158

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0169 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20159

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0223 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20160

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0280 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20161

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0316 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20162

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP2153 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20163

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0003 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20164

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0321 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.

Support

Representation ID: 20165

Received: 28/02/2020

Respondent: Poringland Parish Council

Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0391 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.