Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Search representations
Results for Poringland Parish Council search
New searchSupport
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
No Poringland Preferred Sites
Representation ID: 20156
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports the consultation method of grouping the parishes of Poringland Framingham Earl, Framingham Pigot and well-related parts of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross.
Poringland Parish Council supports the recommendation of no new allocations.
Firstly, Poringland Parish Council is pleased that the consultation relating to allocations in Poringland is not restricted to our parish boundaries, and includes Framingham Earl, Framingham Pigot and well-related parts of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross. Development in Framingham Earl, Framingham Pigot, Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross all have a significant impact on Poringland as the key service centre for the area and the boundaries between Poringland and the surrounding parishes are not easily distinguished.
Poringland Parish Council strongly supports the proposal of no new allocations in this area due to the underlying factors of high amounts of existing commitments and environmental / infrastructure constraints limiting the potential for additional housing.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
No Poringland Reasonable Alternatives
Representation ID: 20157
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports the recommendation that there are no reasonable alternatives for development in Poringland, Framingham Earl and Framingham Pigot (including well related parts of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross) for the reasons of there already being high amounts of existing commitments in the area and the environmental and infractruture constraints.
Poringland Parish Council supports the recommendation that there are no reasonable alternatives for development in Poringland, Framingham Earl and Framingham Pigot (including well related parts of Bixley, Caistor St Edmund and Stoke Holy Cross) for the reasons of there already being high amounts of existing commitments in the area and the environmental and infractruture constraints.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0169
Representation ID: 20158
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0169 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0169 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0223
Representation ID: 20159
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0223 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0223 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0280
Representation ID: 20160
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0280 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0280 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0316
Representation ID: 20161
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0316 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0316 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP2153
Representation ID: 20162
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP2153 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP2153 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0003
Representation ID: 20163
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0003 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0003 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0321
Representation ID: 20164
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0321 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0321 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the document.
Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
GNLP0391 A & B
Representation ID: 20165
Received: 28/02/2020
Respondent: Poringland Parish Council
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0391 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.
Poringland Parish Council supports site GNLP0391 as being an unreasonable site, due to the reasons detailed in the consultation document.
