Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 13217
Received: 21/02/2018
Respondent: Mr Quintin Harper
The site would more than double the size of Badersfield (which is where this site effectively is, it would have little initial impact upon Buxton at all as there is still a sizeable gap between the development and the majority of Lamas). The local primary schools within catchment would be unable to support the number of children that would come with that number of homes. Current transport links and road quality don't lend themselves to increased population either. This, along with the reduced quality of life during the building of it puts me firmly against this site proposal.
The site would more than double the size of Badersfield (which is where this site effectively is, it would have little initial impact upon Buxton at all as there is still a sizeable gap between the development and the majority of Lamas). The local primary schools within catchment would be unable to support the number of children that would come with that number of homes. Current transport links and road quality don't lend themselves to increased population either. This, along with the reduced quality of life during the building of it puts me firmly against this site proposal.