Object

Site Proposals document

Representation ID: 14761

Received: 20/03/2018

Respondent: Miss Karen Fiszer

Representation Summary:

Roads not suitable, village already congested, no parking for existing business, no local infrastructure, noise pollution,

Full text:

I object to both applications for residential dwellings and commercial units on the basis that this has already been refused by an inspector appointed by the secretary of the state after appeal back in 2014. I don't see what has changed, except greed on behalf of the land owner. The village is already congested, Fred Tuddenham Drive cannot come with extra vehicles, the infrastructure locally has no capacity.
The commercial element - the current winery causes untold traffic congestion, with lorries parked along chapel street all day and often at night, with drivers using the village as a lorry park. The staff at the winery already have no parking, and so park along chapel street causing danger to walkers, children especially.
The noise - both the existing units, create noise all day, from staff and heavy machinery inside units. The winery operates all night, with beeping and crashing in the yard, a further 4 units would make an unbearable situation worse.

I moved to a village to enjoy village life, these plans, just compound my thinking, in that I should simply move back to Norwich, withdrawing vital skills and local influence from the village.


STOP THESE PLANS NOW