Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15306
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Greg Peck
I strongly object to this proposal. The scale and of this development would be totally inappropriate in this rural setting. It would not be a sustainable development, as there is insufficient infrastructure to support it. Most importantly it goes against Government planning policy as set out in the NPPF which discourages building on high grade agricultural land. It would consume the villages of Honingham, Colston and Easton making this new development a suburb of the city. Causing the destruction of a large swathe of countryside and contributing to urban sprawl.
I strongly object to this proposal. The scale and of this development would be totally inappropriate in this rural setting. It would not be a sustainable development, as there is insufficient infrastructure to support it. Most importantly it goes against Government planning policy as set out in the NPPF which discourages building on high grade agricultural land. It would consume the villages of Honingham, Colston and Easton making this new development a suburb of the city. Causing the destruction of a large swathe of countryside and contributing to urban sprawl.