Object
Site Proposals document
Representation ID: 15369
Received: 21/03/2018
Respondent: Mr. Kevin Saggers
REJECT this proposal due to:
1. Flooding at all of the sites, mainly due to high water table in the village,
2. Most all services (e.g. sewage, electricity) barely able to cope with existing population,
3. Virtually no 'social' infrastructure - e.g. no shops, no Post Office, only one pub, Village Hall, Junior/Primary school, and church,
4. Very poor road links and capacity,
5. Very poor public transport links - and nothing that would support commuting into Norwich,
6. Contrary to current Village Plan,
7. On extreme fringe of village - few properties and no village facilities in the vicinity.
REJECT this proposal due to:
1. Flooding at all of the sites, mainly due to high water table in the village,
2. Most all services (e.g. sewage, electricity) barely able to cope with existing population,
3. Virtually no 'social' infrastructure - e.g. no shops, no Post Office, only one pub, Village Hall, Junior/Primary school, and church,
4. Very poor road links and capacity,
5. Very poor public transport links - and nothing that would support commuting into Norwich,
6. Contrary to current Village Plan,
7. On extreme fringe of village - few properties and no village facilities in the vicinity.