Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 20280

Received: 04/03/2020

Respondent: Mrs Kara Pull

Representation Summary:

(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)

Respect neighbourhood plan and rural character of the village. Take sensible decisions to use better sites and areas suited to mass development. Do not add to the traffic issues/too busy already country roads. Generally when building new houses ensure its law that big trees are planted to establish development. Rather than just concrete concrete concrete

Full text:

We voted on a neighbourhood plan which should be respected not overruled. Struunpshaw is meant to be a country village large developments ruin this. There are plenty of bigger places that lend itself to housing estates not the leafy tranquil quiet small village of strumpshaw. The roads are country lanes there are few amenities or school play areas etc. Traffic is already bad esp down Hemblington road as a rat run and drivers are too fast around the country lanes which have little pull in places. Public transport is poor. The rural character has already been compromised by the Oakland’s and mill meadow the houses are fine however no attempt is made to plant trees and make them look established and replace the nature that was lost. Why do all small villages have to be developed when there is better quality land in larger places with plenty of roads services and amenities?!