Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20335
Received: 04/03/2020
Respondent: Miss Jo Felgate
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
I am supporting the planning officers’ decision to deem this site unreasonable on the following grounds; there is limited facilities in the village, such as shops or a school. Increased residential housing would cause even more traffic through the village to connect with other villages and the out skirts of the city to access these services. There are other alternatives with better provision for increased housing than a village with minimal facilities so building further residential dwellings in this area is not necessary or needed.
I am supporting the planning officers’ decision to deem this site unreasonable on the following grounds; there is limited facilities in the village, such as shops or a school. Increased residential housing would cause even more traffic through the village to connect with other villages and the out skirts of the city to access these services. There are other alternatives with better provision for increased housing than a village with minimal facilities so building further residential dwellings in this area is not necessary or needed.