Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20447
Received: 07/03/2020
Respondent: Mr David Hooker
The logic behind the proposal to make this a "reasonable alternative" for the longer term after it had been refused once is not the slightest bit compelling and appears only as a tactic to keep the sites open for further consideration. It is an affront to a normal democracy and simply involves the planning department and the public in yet more work and expense. The proposal should be refused in the strongest possible terms.
The logic behind the proposal to make this a "reasonable alternative" for the longer term after it had been refused once is not the slightest bit compelling and appears only as a tactic to keep the sites open for further consideration. It is an affront to a normal democracy and simply involves the planning department and the public in yet more work and expense. The proposal should be refused in the strongest possible terms.