Object
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20464
Received: 07/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Tony Noon
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 2 issue 1 as the site cannot provide “safe ... access to ... schools, healthcare, shops, leisure/community/faith facilities” without the use of a car.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347 as there is no safe walking route to school. As per the Discussion of Submitted Sites “Sites which do not have a safe walking route to school, or where one cannot be created, will not be considered suitable for allocation”. Highways have confirmed it is not feasible to provide an off-carriageway pedestrian facility to enable safe journeys to school.
Outside the development boundary.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 2 issue 1 as the site cannot provide “safe ... access to ... schools, healthcare, shops, leisure/community/faith facilities” without the use of a car.
Contrary to GNLP Policy 7.4 347 as there is no safe walking route to school. As per the Discussion of Submitted Sites “Sites which do not have a safe walking route to school, or where one cannot be created, will not be considered suitable for allocation”. Highways have confirmed it is not feasible to provide an off-carriageway pedestrian facility to enable safe journeys to school.