Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20493
Received: 08/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Roger Pugh
(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)
The site is unsuitable in many ways. There are a number of other sites which afford all of the requirements of such a large operation as proposed by Ben Burgess. The objections set out in the GNLP document are constructive and reflect my views. Were approval to be given the character and nature village of Swainsthorpe would be damaged beyond recognition. I trust that all elected and unelected persons in a position to block this application will do so.
The site is unsuitable in many ways. There are a number of other sites which afford all of the requirements of such a large operation as proposed by Ben Burgess. The objections set out in the GNLP document are constructive and reflect my views. Were approval to be given the character and nature village of Swainsthorpe would be damaged beyond recognition. I trust that all elected and unelected persons in a position to block this application will do so.