Support

Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations

Representation ID: 20600

Received: 10/03/2020

Respondent: Miss Sarah Dugdell

Representation Summary:

(Changed from object to support as respondent is actually supporting the categorisation of the site as unreasonable in the GNLP)

It would appear that this land is behind the Church Rooms/new bungalow development. The only access near to this is opposite the Co-op food store. There is no other access along that stretch of the B1149. This location is completely unsuitable for a development of this sort. The B1149 is pushed to it's maximum now. Should there be an alternative proposed access, this too would be completely unsuitable. I note that the former garage is now vacant? Would this be a proposed entrance? Either way, this proposal is unsuitable for Horsford.

Full text:

It would appear that this land is behind the Church Rooms/new bungalow development. The only access near to this is opposite the Co-op food store. There is no other access along that stretch of the B1149. This location is completely unsuitable for a development of this sort. The B1149 is pushed to it's maximum now. Should there be an alternative proposed access, this too would be completely unsuitable. I note that the former garage is now vacant? Would this be a proposed entrance? Either way, this proposal is unsuitable for Horsford.