Support
Draft Local Plan-Part 2 Site Allocations
Representation ID: 20940
Received: 14/03/2020
Respondent: Mr Anthony Tuddenham
I support Broadland District Council's decision to deem site GNLP0090 as 'unreasonable' for development.
No reason to develop outside Strumpshaw's existing settlement boundary, the council has a 5 year land supply.
Strumpshaw has no schools, post office or shop.
Increased traffic on narrow and single lane local roads, which also doesn’t support the UK’s carbon neutral plan.
Access would have limited visibility and endanger highway safety.
The site would impact an area that is rural and open, with excellent countryside views.
The negative impact on amenity for properties and community through noise, disturbance, nuisance, loss of privacy and overlooking.
I support Broadland District Council's decision to deem site GNLP0090 as 'unreasonable' for development.
No reason to develop outside Strumpshaw's existing settlement boundary, the council has a 5 year land supply.
Strumpshaw has no schools, post office or shop.
Increased traffic on narrow and single lane local roads, which also doesn’t support the UK’s carbon neutral plan.
Access would have limited visibility and endanger highway safety.
The site would impact an area that is rural and open, with excellent countryside views.
The negative impact on amenity for properties and community through noise, disturbance, nuisance, loss of privacy and overlooking.